IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/inrsre/v8y1983i3p271-286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Technique for the Construction of Non-Survey Regional Input-Output Models

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin H. Stevens

    (Regional Science Research Institute, 256 North Pleasant Street, Amherst, MA 01002 USA)

  • George I. Treyz

    (Department of Economics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003 USA)

  • David J. Ehrlich

    (Regional Science Research Institute, 256 North Pleasant Street, Amherst, MA 01002 USA)

  • James R. Bower

    (Regional Science Research Institute, 256 North Pleasant Street, Amherst, MA 01002 USA)

Abstract

A technique for creating regional input-output models based on national input-output technological coefficients is developed and tested. The Regional Purchase Coefficient (RPC), i.e., the proportion of regional demand fulfilled from regional production, is based on substitution between extra-and intra-regional sources in response to relative delivered costs. An RPC estimating equation is fitted using state economic and interstate transportation data. RPCs for all sectors are estimated for use in constructing 500-sector non-survey models for Washington and West Virginia. The A matrices, inverse matrices, and multipliers for suitable aggregations of these models are compared with the corresponding components of recent survey-based models for the same two states. The comparisons indicate that the RPC technique can provide at low cost models that are acceptably accurate for use in regional impact analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin H. Stevens & George I. Treyz & David J. Ehrlich & James R. Bower, 1983. "A New Technique for the Construction of Non-Survey Regional Input-Output Models," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 8(3), pages 271-286, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:inrsre:v:8:y:1983:i:3:p:271-286
    DOI: 10.1177/016001768300800306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/016001768300800306
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/016001768300800306?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G J D Hewings & B N Janson, 1980. "Exchanging Regional Input—Output Coefficients: A Reply and Further Comments," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 12(7), pages 843-854, July.
    2. William A. Schaffer & Kong Chu, 1969. "Nonsurvey Techniques For Constructing Regional Interindustry Models," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(1), pages 83-104, January.
    3. G J D Hewings, 1977. "Evaluating the Possibilities for Exchanging Regional Input—Output Coefficients," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 9(8), pages 927-944, August.
    4. Treyz, George I & Friedlaender, Ann F & Stevens, Benjamin H, 1980. "The Employment Sector of a Regional Policy Simulation Model," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 62(1), pages 63-73, February.
    5. Stanislaw Czamanski & Emil E. Malizia, 1969. "Applicability And Limitations In The Use Of National Input‐Output Tables For Regional Studies," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(1), pages 65-78, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Choi, Jun-Ki & Eom, Jiyong & McClory, Emma, 2018. "Economic and environmental impacts of local utility-delivered industrial energy-efficiency rebate programs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 289-298.
    2. repec:elg:eechap:14395_26 is not listed on IDEAS

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeffery I. Round, 1983. "Nonsurvey Techniques: A Critical Review of the Theory and the Evidence," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 8(3), pages 189-212, December.
    2. David F. Batten, 1982. "The Interregional Linkages between National and Regional Input-Output Models," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 7(1), pages 53-67, May.
    3. Hongli Zhang & Lei Shen & Shuai Zhong & Ayman Elshkaki, 2020. "Economic Structure Transformation and Low-Carbon Development in Energy-Rich Cities: The Case of the Contiguous Area of Shanxi and Shaanxi Provinces, and Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Ronald E. Miller & Peter Blair, 1983. "Estimating State-Level Input-Output Relationships from U.S. Multiregional Data," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 8(3), pages 233-254, December.
    5. Yu, Yang & Hubacek, Klaus & Feng, Kuishuang & Guan, Dabo, 2010. "Assessing regional and global water footprints for the UK," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1140-1147, March.
    6. William H. Miernyk, 1976. "Comments on Recent Developments in Regional Input-Output Analysis," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 1(2), pages 47-55, October.
    7. Andrew M. Isserman, 1980. "Estimating Export Activity in a Regional Economy: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Alternative Methods," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 5(2), pages 155-184, August.
    8. Xiaoyun Zhao & Sung-Goan Choi, 2015. "On the regionalization of input–output tables with an industry-specific location quotient," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 54(3), pages 901-926, May.
    9. Gurgul, Henryk, 2007. "Stochastic input-output modeling," MPRA Paper 68573, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2007.
    10. Robison, M. H., 1992. "A Technique For Making Upward Adjustments In National Coefficients In Pool-Quotient Non-Survey Regional I-O Models," A.E. Research Series 305097, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    11. Lenzen, Manfred & Dey, Christopher & Foran, Barney, 2004. "Energy requirements of Sydney households," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 375-399, July.
    12. McKusick, Robert & Bills, Nelson & Clark, Richard & Jones, Clifford & Niehaus, Robert & Palmer, Charles & Stipe, Sterling & Wilkins, John & Zygadlo, Linda, 1978. "Regional Development and Plan Evaluation: The Use of Input-Output Analysis," Economics Statistics and Cooperative Services (ESCS) Reports 321952, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    13. Elias Giannakis, 2010. "An input-output approach in assessing the impact of extensive versus intensive farming systems on rural development: the case of Greece," Working Papers 2010-01, Agricultural University of Athens, Department Of Agricultural Economics.
    14. Juan David Barón & Gerson Javier pérez & Peter Rowland, 2004. "A Regional Economic Policy for Colombia," Revista de Economía del Rosario, Universidad del Rosario, December.
    15. Marek Radvanský & Ivan Lichner, 2021. "An alternative approach to the construction of multi-regional input–output tables of the Czech Republic: application of the CHARM method," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 48(4), pages 1083-1111, November.
    16. K.W. Clements & Y. Qiang, 1998. "A New Input-output Table for Western Australia - Part 2," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 98-16, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    17. Giannakis, Elias & Efstratoglou, Sophia, 2011. "An input-output approach in assessing the CAP reform impact of extensive versus intensive farming systems on rural development: The case of Greece," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 12(1).
    18. Robison, M. Henry & Miller, Jon R., 1990. "Central-Place Theory And Intercommunity Input-Output Analysis," A.E. Research Series 305070, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    19. Andre Fernandes Tomon Avelino, 2017. "Disaggregating input–output tables in time: the temporal input–output framework," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 313-334, July.
    20. Miller, Bill R. & Liu, Peng Li, 1975. "Regional Input-Output Models Adjusted By Import-Export Survey Data," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 7(2), pages 1-7, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:inrsre:v:8:y:1983:i:3:p:271-286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.