IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/popmgt/v31y2022i12p4304-4318.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supply chain fairness

Author

Listed:
  • Li Chen
  • Hau L. Lee
  • Christopher S. Tang

Abstract

Supply chain fairness refers to the practices that members in a supply chain treat each other. Due to imperfections of a competitive market, some members could exploit their positions or circumstances that enabled them to gain excessive advantage over others. Such unfair practices could be in the form of unfair prices, unfair trade, or unfair pay. The COVID‐19 pandemic has exposed many vulnerabilities of global supply chains, but it also unearthed unfair supply chain practices. Yet, some firms are developing new initiatives to address various supply chain fairness issues, potentially creating strategic values. These observations motivate us to examine the potential benefits, identify underlying challenges, and discuss emerging opportunities for improving fairness in supply chains. This examination has highlighted the potential of a rich research agenda, and we propose research questions for further exploration.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Chen & Hau L. Lee & Christopher S. Tang, 2022. "Supply chain fairness," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4304-4318, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:31:y:2022:i:12:p:4304-4318
    DOI: 10.1111/poms.13849
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13849
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/poms.13849?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kahneman, Daniel & Knetsch, Jack L & Thaler, Richard, 1986. "Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(4), pages 728-741, September.
    2. Felipe Caro & Prashant Chintapalli & Kumar Rajaram & Chris S. Tang, 2018. "Improving Supplier Compliance Through Joint and Shared Audits with Collective Penalty," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 363-380, May.
    3. Li Chen & Shiqing Yao & Kaijie Zhu, 2020. "Responsible Sourcing Under Supplier-Auditor Collusion," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1234-1250, November.
    4. Bhavya Mohan & Ryan W. Buell & Leslie K. John, 2020. "Lifting the Veil: The Benefits of Cost Transparency," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(6), pages 1105-1121, November.
    5. Ernst Fehr & Georg Kirchsteiger & Arno Riedl, 1993. "Does Fairness Prevent Market Clearing? An Experimental Investigation," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 108(2), pages 437-459.
    6. Tang, Christopher S. & Sodhi, ManMohan S. & Formentini, Marco, 2016. "An analysis of partially-guaranteed-price contracts between farmers and agri-food companies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(3), pages 1063-1073.
    7. Li Chen & Hau L. Lee, 2017. "Sourcing Under Supplier Responsibility Risk: The Effects of Certification, Audit, and Contingency Payment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(9), pages 2795-2812, September.
    8. Jessica H. McCoy & Hau L. Lee, 2014. "Using Fairness Models to Improve Equity in Health Delivery Fleet Management," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 23(6), pages 965-977, June.
    9. Hau L. Lee, 2021. "Supply Chains with a Conscience," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(3), pages 815-820, March.
    10. Tang, Christopher S. & Babich, Volodymyr, 2014. "Using social and economic incentives to discourage Chinese suppliers from product adulteration," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 57(4), pages 497-508.
    11. ManMohan S. Sodhi & Christopher S. Tang, 2019. "Research Opportunities in Supply Chain Transparency," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(12), pages 2946-2959, December.
    12. Hau L. Lee & Christopher S. Tang, 2018. "Socially and Environmentally Responsible Value Chain Innovations: New Operations Management Research Opportunities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(3), pages 983-996, March.
    13. Viet Hoang & An Nguyen & Carmen Hubbard & Khanh-Duy Nguyen, 2021. "Exploring the Governance and Fairness in the Milk Value Chain: A Case Study in Vietnam," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-22, September.
    14. ManMohan S. Sodhi & Christopher S. Tang, 2014. "Supply-Chain Research Opportunities with the Poor as Suppliers or Distributors in Developing Countries," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 23(9), pages 1483-1494, September.
    15. George A. Akerlof, 1982. "Labor Contracts as Partial Gift Exchange," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 97(4), pages 543-569.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Subodha Kumar & Christopher S. Tang, 2022. "Expanding the boundaries of the discipline: The 30th‐anniversary issue of Production and Operations Management," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4257-4261, December.
    2. Rodriguez, A.E. & Rosen, John, 2023. "Assessing the Impact of Chokepoints in a Customer Onboarding Process," MPRA Paper 117997, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Zhang, Mengdi & Shen, Qiao & Zhao, Zhiheng & Wang, Shuaian & Huang, George Q., 2024. "Commitment or rent-seeking? Government incentive policies for ESG reporting in sustainable e-commerce logistics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vinayak Deshpande & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2020. "Introduction to the Special Issue on Responsible Operations and Supply Chain Management," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1107-1111, November.
    2. Tarkan Tan & M. Hakan Akyüz & Bengisu Urlu & Santiago Ruiz, 2024. "Stop Auditing and Start to CARE: Paradigm Shift in Assessing and Improving Supplier Sustainability," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 241-263, May.
    3. ManMohan S. Sodhi & Christopher S. Tang, 2021. "Extending AAA Capabilities to Meet PPP Goals in Supply Chains," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(3), pages 625-632, March.
    4. Jónas Oddur Jónasson & Kamalini Ramdas & Alp Sungu, 2022. "Social impact operations at the global base of the pyramid," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4364-4378, December.
    5. Feryal Erhun & Tim Kraft & Sytske Wijnsma, 2021. "Sustainable Triple‐A Supply Chains," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(3), pages 644-655, March.
    6. Nur Sunar & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2022. "Socially relevant and inclusive operations management," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4379-4392, December.
    7. Grossmann, Volker, 2002. "Is it rational to internalize the personal norm that one should reciprocate?," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 27-48, February.
    8. Sohr, Tatjana, 2005. "Wenn die Karriereleiter wegbricht: Fairness und der Abbau von Hierarchieebenen (When the career ladder is removed * fairness and the elimination of hierarchical levels)," Zeitschrift für ArbeitsmarktForschung - Journal for Labour Market Research, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 38(1), pages 68-86.
    9. Charness, Gary, 2000. "Responsibility and effort in an experimental labor market," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 375-384, July.
    10. Uri Gneezy & John A List, 2006. "Putting Behavioral Economics to Work: Testing for Gift Exchange in Labor Markets Using Field Experiments," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 74(5), pages 1365-1384, September.
    11. Konow, James, 1996. "A positive theory of economic fairness," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 13-35, October.
    12. John A. List, 2006. "The Behavioralist Meets the Market: Measuring Social Preferences and Reputation Effects in Actual Transactions," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 114(1), pages 1-37, February.
    13. Edmans, Alex & Gosling, Tom & Jenter, Dirk, 2023. "CEO compensation: Evidence from the field," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(3).
    14. Bejarano, Hernán & Corgnet, Brice & Gómez-Miñambres, Joaquín, 2021. "Economic stability promotes gift-exchange in the workplace," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 374-398.
    15. Behncke, Stefanie & Frölich, Markus & Lechner, Michael, 2008. "A Caseworker Like Me: Does the Similarity between Unemployed and Caseworker Increase Job Placements?," IZA Discussion Papers 3437, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Bogliacino, Francesco & Grimalda, Gianluca & Pipke, David, 2021. "Kind or contented? An investigation of the gift exchange hypothesis in a natural field experiment in Colombia," Kiel Working Papers 2199, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    17. Dufwenberg, Martin & Kirchsteiger, Georg, 2004. "A theory of sequential reciprocity," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 268-298, May.
    18. Fehr, Ernst & Kirchler, Erich & Weichbold, Andreas & Gächter, Simon, 1998. "When Social Norms Overpower Competition: Gift Exchange in Experimental Labor Markets," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 16(2), pages 324-351, April.
    19. Fehr, Ernst & Kirchsteiger, Georg & Riedl, Arno, 1998. "Gift exchange and reciprocity in competitive experimental markets," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 1-34, January.
    20. Li Chen & Shiqing Yao & Kaijie Zhu, 2020. "Responsible Sourcing Under Supplier-Auditor Collusion," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1234-1250, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:31:y:2022:i:12:p:4304-4318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1937-5956 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.