IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/popmgt/v25y2016i4p647-661.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental Results Indicating Lattice-Dependent Policies May Be Optimal for General Assemble-To-Order Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Emre Nadar
  • Mustafa Akan
  • Alan Scheller-Wolf

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Emre Nadar & Mustafa Akan & Alan Scheller-Wolf, 2016. "Experimental Results Indicating Lattice-Dependent Policies May Be Optimal for General Assemble-To-Order Systems," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 25(4), pages 647-661, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:25:y:2016:i:4:p:647-661
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/poms.12498
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. de Kok, Ton & Grob, Christopher & Laumanns, Marco & Minner, Stefan & Rambau, Jörg & Schade, Konrad, 2018. "A typology and literature review on stochastic multi-echelon inventory models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(3), pages 955-983.
    2. ElHafsi, Mohsen & Fang, Jianxin & Hamouda, Essia, 2020. "A novel decomposition-based method for solving general-product structure assemble-to-order systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(1), pages 233-249.
    3. Atan, Zümbül & Ahmadi, Taher & Stegehuis, Clara & Kok, Ton de & Adan, Ivo, 2017. "Assemble-to-order systems: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 866-879.
    4. Karaarslan, Gönül A. & Atan, Zümbül & de Kok, Ton & Kiesmüller, Gudrun P., 2018. "Optimal and heuristic policies for assemble-to-order systems with different review periods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(1), pages 80-96.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:25:y:2016:i:4:p:647-661. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1937-5956 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.