IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/mathfi/v11y2001i3p315-329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

No Arbitrage in Discrete Time Under Portfolio Constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Laurence Carassus
  • Huye^n Pham
  • Nizar Touzi

Abstract

In frictionless securities markets, the characterization of the no‐arbitrage condition by the existence of equivalent martingale measures in discrete time is known as the fundamental theorem of asset pricing. In the presence of convex constraints on the trading strategies, we extend this theorem under a closedness condition and a nondegeneracy assumption. We then provide connections with the superreplication problem solved in Föllmer and Kramkov (1997).

Suggested Citation

  • Laurence Carassus & Huye^n Pham & Nizar Touzi, 2001. "No Arbitrage in Discrete Time Under Portfolio Constraints," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(3), pages 315-329, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:mathfi:v:11:y:2001:i:3:p:315-329
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9965.00117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9965.00117
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9965.00117?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fontana, Claudio & Runggaldier, Wolfgang J., 2021. "Arbitrage concepts under trading restrictions in discrete-time financial markets," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 66-80.
    2. Firoozi, Fathali, 2006. "On the martingale property of economic and financial instruments," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 87-96.
    3. Xiangyu Cui & Duan Li & Xun Li, 2014. "Mean-Variance Policy for Discrete-time Cone Constrained Markets: The Consistency in Efficiency and Minimum-Variance Signed Supermartingale Measure," Papers 1403.0718, arXiv.org.
    4. Stefan Gerhold & Paul Kruhner, 2017. "Dynamic trading under integer constraints," Papers 1708.07661, arXiv.org.
    5. Philippe ARTZNER & Karl-Theodor EISELE & Thorsten SCHMIDT, 2022. "Insurance-Finance Arbitrage," Working Papers of LaRGE Research Center 2022-09, Laboratoire de Recherche en Gestion et Economie (LaRGE), Université de Strasbourg.
    6. X. Chao & K. Lai & Shou-Yang Wang & Mei Yu, 2005. "Optimal Consumption Portfolio and No-Arbitrage with Nonproportional Transaction Costs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 211-221, March.
    7. Evstigneev, Igor V. & Schürger, Klaus & Taksar, Michael I., 2002. "On the fundamental theorem of asset pricing: random constraints and bang-bang no-arbitrage criteria," Bonn Econ Discussion Papers 24/2002, University of Bonn, Bonn Graduate School of Economics (BGSE).
    8. Xun Li & Zuo Quan Xu, 2015. "Continuous-Time Mean-Variance Portfolio Selection with Constraints on Wealth and Portfolio," Papers 1507.06850, arXiv.org.
    9. Arash Fahim & Yu-Jui Huang, 2016. "Model-independent superhedging under portfolio constraints," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 51-81, January.
    10. Arash Fahim & Yu-Jui Huang, 2014. "Model-independent Superhedging under Portfolio Constraints," Papers 1402.2599, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2015.
    11. Alet Roux, 2007. "The fundamental theorem of asset pricing under proportional transaction costs," Papers 0710.2758, arXiv.org.
    12. Buckley, Winston S. & Brown, Garfield O. & Marshall, Mario, 2012. "A mispricing model of stocks under asymmetric information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(3), pages 584-592.
    13. Takuji Arai, 2015. "Good deal bounds with convex constraints," Papers 1506.00396, arXiv.org.
    14. Claudio Fontana & Wolfgang J. Runggaldier, 2020. "Arbitrage concepts under trading restrictions in discrete-time financial markets," Papers 2006.15563, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2020.
    15. Stefan Gerhold & Paul Krühner, 2018. "Dynamic trading under integer constraints," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 919-957, October.
    16. Fu, Chenpeng & Lari-Lavassani, Ali & Li, Xun, 2010. "Dynamic mean-variance portfolio selection with borrowing constraint," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 312-319, January.
    17. Miklos Rasonyi & Lukasz Stettner, 2005. "On utility maximization in discrete-time financial market models," Papers math/0505243, arXiv.org.
    18. Takuji Arai, 2016. "Good deal bounds with convex constraints: --- examples and proofs ---," Keio-IES Discussion Paper Series 2016-017, Institute for Economics Studies, Keio University.
    19. M. Dempster & I. Evstigneev & M. Taksar, 2006. "Asset Pricing and Hedging in Financial Markets with Transaction Costs: An Approach Based on the Von Neumann–Gale Model," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 2(4), pages 327-355, October.
    20. Esmaeil Babaei, 2024. "Asset pricing and hedging in financial markets with fixed and proportional transaction costs," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 259-275, June.
    21. Arash Fahim & Yu-Jui Huang, 2016. "Model-independent superhedging under portfolio constraints," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 51-81, January.
    22. Takuji Arai, 2017. "Good Deal Bounds With Convex Constraints," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(02), pages 1-15, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:mathfi:v:11:y:2001:i:3:p:315-329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0960-1627 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.