IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v57y2020i3p597-625.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Bribery Paradox in Transition Economies and the Enactment of ‘New Normal’ Business Environments

Author

Listed:
  • Kimberly A. Eddleston
  • Elitsa R. Banalieva
  • Alain Verbeke

Abstract

We develop a novel, sense‐making perspective on corruption in transition economies. Prior research has focused on understanding why some entrepreneurs are more likely to pay bribes than others. It typically assumes that paying bribes will lead to an intended – albeit unfair – competitive advantage. We challenge this assumption and uncover a bribery paradox: drawing upon sense‐making logic, we argue that beyond gaining an immediate benefit from bribing, entrepreneurs who frequently pay bribes may in the longer run be enacting a ‘new normal’ business environment perceived as high in obstacles, especially in transition countries. As sense making is grounded in identity construction and one’s social context, we argue that owners of family firms will be especially vulnerable to the dangers of perceiving greater obstacles over time and enacting an obstacle‐ridden ‘new normal’ business environment. We find empirical support for our framework on a sample of 310 privately held small and medium‐sized enterprises (SMEs) from 22 transition economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Kimberly A. Eddleston & Elitsa R. Banalieva & Alain Verbeke, 2020. "The Bribery Paradox in Transition Economies and the Enactment of ‘New Normal’ Business Environments," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 597-625, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:57:y:2020:i:3:p:597-625
    DOI: 10.1111/joms.12551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12551
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joms.12551?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nieto, María Jesús & Rodríguez, Alicia & Hernández, Virginia, 2022. "International sourcing and the productivity of SMEs in transition countries: Formal and informal ‘region effects’ and the communist footprint," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 347-359.
    2. Lee, Mina & Mutlu, Canan & Lee, Seung-Hyun, 2023. "Bribery and Firm Growth: Sensemaking in CEE and Post-Soviet Countries," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(1).
    3. Zhou, Kevin Zheng & Wang, Kui & Xu, Dean & Xie, En, 2022. "Drinking poison to quench thirst: Does bribery foster firm performance in China?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 505-517.
    4. Xi Zhong & Ge Ren & XiaoJie Wu, 2024. "Corporate philanthropy and bribery as distinctive responses to economic policy uncertainty: Do state-owned and private firms differ?," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 641-677, June.
    5. Grazia D. Santangelo & Alain Verbeke, 2022. "Actionable guidelines to improve ‘theory-related’ contributions to international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(9), pages 1843-1855, December.
    6. Charles E. Stevens & Aloysius Newenham‐Kahindi, 2021. "Avoid, acquiesce … or engage? New insights from sub‐Saharan Africa on MNE strategies for managing corruption," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 273-301, February.
    7. Ethiopia L. Segaro & Kajsa Haag, 2022. "Good Intentions Gone Awry: Government Intervention and Multistakeholder Engagement in a Frontier Market," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(4), pages 1019-1040, November.
    8. Zhicheng Duan & Tingting Tang, 2022. "Quantitative Simulation and Verification of the Coordination Curves between Sustainable Development and Green Innovation Efficiency: From the Perspective of Urban Agglomerations Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-22, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:57:y:2020:i:3:p:597-625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.