IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v55y2018i4p703-727.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prying Eyes: A Dramaturgical Approach to Professional Surveillance

Author

Listed:
  • Laura M. Visser
  • Inge L. Bleijenbergh
  • Yvonne W. M. Benschop
  • Allard C. R. van Riel

Abstract

This study examines how professionals engage with the increased surveillance of their daily work. We develop an understanding of professional surveillance at the micro†level of interaction by drawing on dramaturgical literature. Based on qualitative interviews and observational data of healthcare professionals using a new technology to communicate simultaneously with each other and individual patients, we analyse how professionals use different elements of the theatre (e.g., stages and scripts) to enact surveillance. The significance of our contribution lies especially in the dramaturgical reconceptualization of surveillance as enacted, making it an integral part of displaying one's professionalism.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura M. Visser & Inge L. Bleijenbergh & Yvonne W. M. Benschop & Allard C. R. van Riel, 2018. "Prying Eyes: A Dramaturgical Approach to Professional Surveillance," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), pages 703-727, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:55:y:2018:i:4:p:703-727
    DOI: 10.1111/joms.12283
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12283
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joms.12283?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Darren McCabe & Sylwia Ciuk & Margaret Gilbert, 2022. "‘This Is the End’? An Ethnographic Study of Management Control and a New Management Initiative," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 36(3), pages 503-521, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:55:y:2018:i:4:p:703-727. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.