IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v39y2002i1p23-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Battle in the Boardroom: A Discursive Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Wilson Ng
  • Christian De Cock

Abstract

This article examines the centrality of discourse in achieving managerially relevant outcomes, with a focus on the in‐situ performance context of corporate storytellers. The Ricœurian concept of speech act, capturing both the intentionality of organizational discourse and the social context of its production and reception, implicitly guided our research effort. The article has at its core a story of how senior organizational officers exploited the volatile circumstances of a public takeover in Singapore. By looking at the social construction of narratives in their many fragments we come to see how a key protagonist carves out a powerful position. The efficacy of his performances can be seen to be dependent upon the effective use of poetic tropes and the receptiveness of listeners to particular Chinese archetypal relationship‐driven themes. In crafting our story we use multiple texts which were produced in and around two case organizations. As such we offer a carefully constructed collage, a mixture of production and reproduction, sticking closely to forms of communication that key organizational actors used to plan, enact and interpret their actions and those of others. Whilst our story offers insights to readers with an interest in organizational discourse, corporate governance and Asian management practices, we refrain from imposing an authoritarian interpretation that insists on identifying with the intentions of the authors.

Suggested Citation

  • Wilson Ng & Christian De Cock, 2002. "Battle in the Boardroom: A Discursive Perspective," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 23-49, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:39:y:2002:i:1:p:23-49
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-6486.00281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00281
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-6486.00281?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shalini Sahni & Chandranshu Sinha, 2016. "Systematic Literature Review on Narratives in Organizations: Research Issues and Avenues for Future Research," Vision, , vol. 20(4), pages 368-379, December.
    2. Miika Kuoppamaki, 2018. "Concepts of Board Performance: Review of Performance Metrics in Boards Research," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(3), pages 41-53, August.
    3. Brennan, Niamh M. & Daly, Caroline A. & Harrington, Claire S., 2010. "Rhetoric, argument and impression management in hostile takeover defence documents," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 253-268.
    4. Kallifatides, Markus & Petrelius Karlberg, Pernilla, 2012. "What makes for a value-creating corporate board? A literature synthesis and suggestions for research," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Business Administration 2012:1, Stockholm School of Economics, revised 25 Jun 2013.
    5. Michel SEGUIN & Sylvie GUERRERO, 2010. "Le tandem président - directeur général au sein de coopératives financières canadiennes : la compétence du leadership," CIRIEC Working Papers 1005, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    6. Eric W. K. Tsang, 2022. "Alternative typologies of case study theorizing: Causal explanation versus theory development as a classification dimension," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(1), pages 53-63, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:39:y:2002:i:1:p:23-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.