IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v37y2000i3p427-443.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managerial Behaviour Research in Private and Public Sectors: Distinctiveness, Disputes and Directions

Author

Listed:
  • Mirko Noordegraaf
  • Rosemary Stewart

Abstract

A managerial behaviour approach is identified that has sought to understand managerial work by analysing the day‐to‐day behaviour of individual managers: what do managers do? It is argued that this approach is distinctive and that its distinctiveness is valuable and has not received adequate attention. The distinctiveness is defined by its research background, object, focus and methodology. The managerial behaviour approach has developed from research over nearly fifty years: long enough for there to have been a variety of disputes about what has, or ought to have been, achieved. The relevance of these criticisms and what later research has done to meet them is assessed. Recent research directions are identified and suggestions are made for building on the distinctiveness. It is concluded that the institutional embeddedness of managerial work should attract further scholarly attention, and that the contribution of researchers in the public sector, who come from a differentdisciplinary background, needs to be integrated with that of researchers from organizational behaviour as they can contribute new conceptual approaches, which could help to revivify this field of research.

Suggested Citation

  • Mirko Noordegraaf & Rosemary Stewart, 2000. "Managerial Behaviour Research in Private and Public Sectors: Distinctiveness, Disputes and Directions," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(3), pages 427-443, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:37:y:2000:i:3:p:427-443
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-6486.00187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00187
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-6486.00187?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hall, Matthew, 2010. "Accounting information and managerial work," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 28539, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Dae Seok Chai & Shinhee Jeong & Junhee Kim & Sewon Kim & Robert G. Hamlin, 2016. "Perceived managerial and leadership effectiveness in a Korean context: An indigenous qualitative study," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 789-820, September.
    3. van Hoorn, Andre, 2016. "How much does job autonomy vary across countries and other extra-organizational contexts?," MPRA Paper 80010, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Björk, Lisa & Härenstam, Annika, 2016. "Differences in organizational preconditions for managers in genderized municipal services," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 209-219.
    5. Annika Härenstam & Anders Pousette & Erik Berntson, 2022. "Improving organizational and working conditions for managers in the Swedish public sector: A conceptual model and evaluation of interventions," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(1), pages 72-97, February.
    6. Erkki Laitinen, 2014. "The association between CEO work, management accounting information, and financial performance: evidence from Finnish top managers," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 25(3), pages 221-257, December.
    7. Hall, Matthew, 2010. "Accounting information and managerial work," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 301-315, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:37:y:2000:i:3:p:427-443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.