IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v35y1998i2p125-136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Durkheim and the Limits of Corporate Culture: Whose Culture? Which Durkheim

Author

Listed:
  • Ken Starkey

Abstract

Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in Durkheimian perspectives on management. P. Dahler‐Larsen uses such a perspective to critique theories of corporate culture. He is particularly critical of corporate culture’s claim that the locus of morality can exist in organizations. This, he argues, is inimical to Durkheim’s view of morality as a societal phenomenon. This paper argues that this criticism of corporate culture is limited on two counts. First, it is limited in its failure to deal with those proponents of corporate culture who are themselves critical of culture as a form of ideological control. Secondly, it is based on only one of several possible readings of Durkheim. In his later work, Durkheim analyses the construction and destruction of social solidarities. A Durkheimian reading of organizational culture and the related phenomenon of the learning organization allows us to develop a view of management and organization in which culture is conceived as a heterogeneous rather than homogeneous.

Suggested Citation

  • Ken Starkey, 1998. "Durkheim and the Limits of Corporate Culture: Whose Culture? Which Durkheim," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 125-136, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:35:y:1998:i:2:p:125-136
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-6486.00087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00087
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-6486.00087?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Desmond, John & Crane, Andrew, 2004. "Morality and the consequences of marketing action," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(11), pages 1222-1230, November.
    2. Lincoln, James R. & Guillot, Didier, 2004. "Durkheim and Organizational Culture," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt00v999cr, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:35:y:1998:i:2:p:125-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.