IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v66y2015i9p1763-1775.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the retrieval effectiveness of web search engines using a representative query sample

Author

Listed:
  • Dirk Lewandowski

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Dirk Lewandowski, 2015. "Evaluating the retrieval effectiveness of web search engines using a representative query sample," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(9), pages 1763-1775, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:66:y:2015:i:9:p:1763-1775
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/asi.23304
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dirk Lewandowski & Ulrike Spree, 2011. "Ranking of Wikipedia articles in search engines revisited: Fair ranking for reasonable quality?," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(1), pages 117-132, January.
    2. Dania Bilal, 2012. "Ranking, relevance judgment, and precision of information retrieval on children's queries: Evaluation of Google, Yahoo!, Bing, Yahoo! Kids, and ask Kids," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(9), pages 1879-1896, September.
    3. Bernard J. Jansen & Mimi Zhang & Carsten D. Schultz, 2009. "Brand and its effect on user perception of search engine performance," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 60(8), pages 1572-1595, August.
    4. Dirk Lewandowski & Ulrike Spree, 2011. "Ranking of Wikipedia articles in search engines revisited: Fair ranking for reasonable quality?," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(1), pages 117-132, January.
    5. A. Bookstein, 1990. "Informetric distributions, part I: Unified overview," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 41(5), pages 368-375, July.
    6. Wolfgang G. Stock, 2006. "On relevance distributions," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 57(8), pages 1126-1129, June.
    7. H. Vernon Leighton & Jaideep Srivastava, 1999. "First 20 precision among World Wide Web search services (search engines)," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 50(10), pages 870-881.
    8. Steve Lawrence & C. Lee Giles, 1999. "Accessibility of information on the web," Nature, Nature, vol. 400(6740), pages 107-107, July.
    9. Dania Bilal, 2012. "Ranking, relevance judgment, and precision of information retrieval on children's queries: Evaluation of Google, Yahoo!, Bing, Yahoo! Kids, and ask Kids," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(9), pages 1879-1896, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amosa Babalola & Olayemi Olalekan & Onyeka Ndidi & Nwaekpe Christian, 2021. "Usage of Internet Search Engines among Polytechnic Students," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 8(9), pages 76-80, September.
    2. Tenvir Ali & Zeeshan Jhandir & Ingyu Lee & Byung-Won On & Gyu Sang Choi, 2017. "Evaluating Retrieval Effectiveness by Sustainable Rank List," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-20, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicolas Jullien, 2012. "What We Know About Wikipedia: A Review of the Literature Analyzing the Project(s)," Post-Print hal-00857208, HAL.
    2. Grace Gimon Betancourt & Armando Segnini & Carlos Trabuco & Amira Rezgui & Nicolas Jullien, 2016. "Mining team characteristics to predict Wikipedia article quality," Post-Print hal-01354368, HAL.
    3. Kevin Crowston & Nicolas Jullien & Felipe Ortega, 2013. "Is Wikipedia Inefficient? Modelling Effort and Participation in Wikipedia," Post-Print hal-00947731, HAL.
    4. Gandal, Neil, 2001. "The dynamics of competition in the internet search engine market," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 19(7), pages 1103-1117, July.
    5. Ingo Knuth & Janina Masuhr, 2023. "Decision Drivers for Search Engine Usage – The Mediating and Moderating Role of Lock-in Effects," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(10), pages 1-86, February.
    6. Giancarlo Ruocco & Cinzia Daraio, 2013. "An empirical approach to compare the performance of heterogeneous academic fields," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 97(3), pages 601-625, December.
    7. Eric T. Bradlow & David C. Schmittlein, 2000. "The Little Engines That Could: Modeling the Performance of World Wide Web Search Engines," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 43-62, June.
    8. Judit Bar-Ilan, 2018. "Eugene Garfield on the Web in 2001," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(2), pages 389-399, February.
    9. Judit Bar-Ilan, 2001. "Data collection methods on the Web for infometric purposes — A review and analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 50(1), pages 7-32, January.
    10. Antal Bosch & Toine Bogers & Maurice Kunder, 2016. "Estimating search engine index size variability: a 9-year longitudinal study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 107(2), pages 839-856, May.
    11. Judit Bar-Ilan & Rina Azoulay, 2012. "Map of nonprofit organization websites in Israel," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(6), pages 1142-1167, June.
    12. Rangaswamy, Arvind & Giles, C. Lee & Seres, Silvija, 2009. "A Strategic Perspective on Search Engines: Thought Candies for Practitioners and Researchers," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 49-60.
    13. Dimosthenis Kifokeris & Yiannis Xenidis, 2021. "Game Theory-Based Minimization of the Ostracism Risk in Construction Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, June.
    14. Amancio, Diego R. & Oliveira Jr., Osvaldo N. & Costa, Luciano da F., 2012. "Structure–semantics interplay in complex networks and its effects on the predictability of similarity in texts," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(18), pages 4406-4419.
    15. Blazewicz, Jacek & Pesch, Erwin & Sterna, Malgorzata, 2005. "A novel representation of graph structures in web mining and data analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 65-71, February.
    16. García-Gallego Aurora & Georgantzís Nikolaos & Pereira Pedro & Pernías-Cerrillo José C., 2016. "Bias and Size Effects of Price-Comparison Platforms: Theory and Experimental Evidence," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 15(1), pages 1-34, March.
    17. Gao, Yuyang & Liang, Wei & Shi, Yuming & Huang, Qiuling, 2014. "Comparison of directed and weighted co-occurrence networks of six languages," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 393(C), pages 579-589.
    18. Liang, Wei & Shi, Yuming & Tse, Chi K. & Liu, Jing & Wang, Yanli & Cui, Xunqiang, 2009. "Comparison of co-occurrence networks of the Chinese and English languages," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 388(23), pages 4901-4909.
    19. Heinrich Behrens & Peter Luksch, 2011. "Mathematics 1868–2008: a bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 86(1), pages 179-194, January.
    20. Xu, Yongxin & Xuan, Yuhao & Zheng, Gaoping, 2021. "Internet searching and stock price crash risk: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 255-275.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:66:y:2015:i:9:p:1763-1775. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.