IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jfnres/v10y1987i2p99-110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relative Stock Prices And The Firm Size Effect

Author

Listed:
  • Terry L. Zivney
  • Donald J. Thompson II

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Terry L. Zivney & Donald J. Thompson II, 1987. "Relative Stock Prices And The Firm Size Effect," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 10(2), pages 99-110, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jfnres:v:10:y:1987:i:2:p:99-110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1475-6803.1987.tb00482.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henry S. Schneider, 1951. "Two Formula Methods For Choosing Common Stocks," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 6(2), pages 229-237, June.
    2. Brown, Stephen J. & Warner, Jerold B., 1980. "Measuring security price performance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 205-258, September.
    3. Marshall Blume & Robert Stambaugh, "undated". "Biases in Computed Returns: An Application to the Size Effect (Revision of 2-83)," Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research Working Papers 11-83, Wharton School Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research.
    4. Constantinides, George M., 1984. "Optimal stock trading with personal taxes : Implications for prices and the abnormal January returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 65-89, March.
    5. Reinganum, Marc R, 1982. "A Direct Test of Roll's Conjecture on the Firm Size Effect," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 37(1), pages 27-35, March.
    6. Blume, Marshall E. & Stambaugh, Robert F., 1983. "Biases in computed returns : An application to the size effect," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 387-404, November.
    7. Basu, Sanjoy, 1983. "The relationship between earnings' yield, market value and return for NYSE common stocks : Further evidence," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 129-156, June.
    8. Roll, Richard, 1983. "On computing mean returns and the small firm premium," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 371-386, November.
    9. Schultz, Paul, 1985. "Personal Income Taxes and the January Effect: Small Firm Stock Returns before the War Revenue Act of 1917: A Note," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 40(1), pages 333-343, March.
    10. Roll, Richard, 1981. "A Possible Explanation of the Small Firm Effect," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 36(4), pages 879-888, September.
    11. Reinganum, Marc R., 1981. "Misspecification of capital asset pricing : Empirical anomalies based on earnings' yields and market values," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 19-46, March.
    12. Keim, Donald B., 1983. "Size-related anomalies and stock return seasonality : Further empirical evidence," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 13-32, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael J. Alderson & Terry L. Zivney, 1994. "On Computing Bond Returns: The Evaluation Of Low-Grade Debt," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 17(3), pages 403-415, September.
    2. Edward Miller & John Hill & John Lajaunie & Cuddalore Sundar, 1991. "The Effect Of The 1986 Tax Law Changes On The January Performance Of Losers," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(1), pages 62-66, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert J. Sweeney & Robert F. Scherer & Janet Goulet & Waldemar M. Goulet, 1996. "Investment Behavior and the Small Firm Effect," Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, Pepperdine University, Graziadio School of Business and Management, vol. 5(3), pages 251-269, Fall.
    2. Gabriel Hawawini & Donald B. Keim, "undated". "The Cross Section of Common Stock Returns: A Review of the Evidence and Some New Findings," Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research Working Papers 08-99, Wharton School Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research.
    3. Terry L Zivney & Donald J. Thompson II, 1989. "The Effect Of Market Proxy Rebalancing Policies On Detecting Abnormal Performance," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 12(4), pages 293-299, December.
    4. Daniel Folkinshteyn & Gulser Meric, 2014. "The Financial Characteristics of Large and Small Firms Before and After the 2008 Stock Market Crash," The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 8(1), pages 1-16.
    5. Higson, Chris & Elliott, Jamie, 1998. "Post-takeover returns: The UK evidence," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 27-46, January.
    6. Wolfgang Aussenegg & Andreas Grünbichler, 1999. "Der Size-Effekt am Österreichischen Aktienmarkt," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 51(7), pages 636-661, July.
    7. Chen, Tsung-Cheng & Chien, Chin-Chen, 2011. "Size effect in January and cultural influences in an emerging stock market: The perspective of behavioral finance," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 208-229, April.
    8. Trabelsi, Mohamed Ali, 2010. "Choix de portefeuille: comparaison des différentes stratégies [Portfolio selection: comparison of different strategies]," MPRA Paper 82946, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 Dec 2010.
    9. William P. Lloyd & John S. Jahera Jr. & Steven J. Goldstein, 1986. "The Relation Between Returns, Ownership Structure, And Market Value," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 9(2), pages 171-177, June.
    10. Chen, Zhongdong & Schmidt, Adam & Wang, Jin’ai, 2021. "Retail investor risk-seeking, attention, and the January effect," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(C).
    11. Victor Bernard & Jacob Thomas & James Wahlen, 1997. "Accounting†Based Stock Price Anomalies: Separating Market Inefficiencies from Risk," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(2), pages 89-136, June.
    12. Durand, Robert B. & Juricev, Alex & Smith, Gary W., 2007. "SMB -- Arousal, disproportionate reactions and the size-premium," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 315-328, September.
    13. Don Anderson & Anthony Lynch & Nicholas Mathiou, 1990. "Behaviour of CAPM Anomalies in Smaller Firms: Australian Evidence," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 15(1), pages 1-38, June.
    14. William Kross, 1985. "The Size Effect Is Primarily A Price Effect," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 8(3), pages 169-179, September.
    15. Barry, Christopher B. & Goldreyer, Elizabeth & Lockwood, Larry & Rodriguez, Mauricio, 2002. "Robustness of size and value effects in emerging equity markets, 1985-2000," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 3(1), pages 1-30, March.
    16. James R. Booth & Richard L. Smith, 1987. "An Examination Of The Small-Firm Effect On The Basis Of Skewness Preference," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 10(1), pages 77-86, March.
    17. Branch, Ben & Echevarria, David P., 1998. "The bid-ask bias and the size effect: A test of the Blume-Stambaugh bid-ask bias effect hypothesis," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 129-148.
    18. Fernando Rubio, 2005. "Eficiencia De Mercado, Administracion De Carteras De Fondos Y Behavioural Finance," Finance 0503028, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 23 Jul 2005.
    19. Kohers, Theodor & Pandey, Vivek & Kohers, Gerald, 1997. "Using nonlinear dynamics to test for market efficiency among the major U.S. stock exchanges," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 523-545.
    20. Bjorn Wahlroos & Tom Berglund, 1984. "Anomalies and Equilibrium Returns in a Small Stock Market," Discussion Papers 589, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jfnres:v:10:y:1987:i:2:p:99-110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.