IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v60y2022i3p801-820.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explaining Sub‐Federal Variation in Trade Agreement Negotiations: The Case of CETA

Author

Listed:
  • Jörg Broschek
  • Patricia M. Goff

Abstract

Sub‐federal units have emerged as increasingly important actors in international trade policy. This is puzzling as they usually have no formal competencies in this area. Using the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada and the European Union as a case study, this article examines one key driver behind this development ‐ the provisions in new free trade agreements. The article conceptualizes such provisions as instances of negative and positive integration. We show that while the Canadian provinces largely supported both types of provisions, sub‐federal units in Belgium, Germany and Austria resisted unfettered liberalization through negative integration and market‐creating positive integration. At the same time, they demanded stronger market‐correcting positive integration measures. Three categories of sub‐federal interests explain these differences in motivation. The Canadian province's engagement was motivated by (regional) economic interests, whereas bureaucratic self‐interest and political interests mobilized sub‐federal units in the European federations.

Suggested Citation

  • Jörg Broschek & Patricia M. Goff, 2022. "Explaining Sub‐Federal Variation in Trade Agreement Negotiations: The Case of CETA," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 801-820, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:60:y:2022:i:3:p:801-820
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13287
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13287
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.13287?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Egan, Michelle, 2015. "Single Markets: Economic Integration in Europe and the United States," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199280506.
    2. Scharpf, Fritz W., 2010. "Community and autonomy: Institutions, policies and legitimacy in multilevel Europe," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 68, number 68.
    3. Andrew Moravcsik, 2018. "Preferences, Power and Institutions in 21st‐century Europe," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(7), pages 1648-1674, November.
    4. Dirk De Bièvre & Arlo Poletti, 2020. "Towards Explaining Varying Degrees of Politicization of EU Trade Agreement Negotiations," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 243-253.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jörg Broschek, 2023. "Multilevel Trade Policy in the Joint‐Decision Trap? The Case of CETA," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(3), pages 300-311.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moritz Rehm, 2021. "Tug of War over Financial Assistance: Which Way Forward for Eurozone Stability Mechanisms?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 173-184.
    2. Dirk De Bièvre & Patricia Garcia-Duran & Leif Johan Eliasson & Oriol Costa, 2020. "Editorial: Politicization of EU Trade Policy Across Time and Space," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 239-242.
    3. Scheck, Christoph & Wilske, Sebastian, 2011. "Infrastrukturentwicklung im europäischen Korridor Rotterdam-Genua: das INTERREG-IV-B-Projekt "Code 24"," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Hege, Hans-Peter & Knapstein, Yvonne & Meng, Rüdiger & Ruppenthal, Kerstin & Schmitz-Veltin, Ansgar (ed.), Schneller, öfter, weiter? Perspektiven der Raumentwicklung in der Mobilitätsgesellschaft. 13. Junges Forum der ARL 13. bis 15. Oktober 2010 in Mannhei, volume 1, pages 56-71, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    4. Sabine Weck & Sabine Beißwenger, 2014. "Coping with Peripheralization: Governance Response in Two German Small Cities," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(10), pages 2156-2171, October.
    5. Benjamin Bürbaumer, 2021. "The Limits of Traditional Bargaining under Deep Integration: TTIP Stumbling over Technical Barriers to Trade," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1069-1085, September.
    6. Camille Nessel & Elke Verhaeghe, 2022. "‘A Force for Good’: The Narrative Construction of Ethical EU–Vietnam Trade Relations," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 741-758, May.
    7. Martijn Huysmans & Niels Gheyle, 2023. "Regional representation in the European Parliament: Parliamentary Questions on Geographical Indication," Working Papers 2309, Utrecht School of Economics.
    8. Maria Chiara Vinciguerra, 2021. "Punching Below Its Weight: The Role of the European Parliament in Politicised Consultation Procedures," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(3), pages 29-39.
    9. Costas Lapavitsas, 2019. "Political Economy of the Greek Crisis," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 51(1), pages 31-51, March.
    10. Anke Moerland & Clara Weinhardt, 2020. "Politicisation ‘Reversed’: EU Free Trade Negotiations with West Africa and the Caribbean," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 266-276.
    11. Malmberg, Jonas, 2010. "Posting Post Laval International and National Responses," Working Paper Series, Center for Labor Studies 2010:5, Uppsala University, Department of Economics.
    12. Bart-Jaap Verbeek, 2022. "Embedded Neoliberalism and the Legitimacy of the Post-Lisbon European Union Investment Policy," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(3), pages 110-120.
    13. Basedow, Robert & Hoerner, Julian, 2024. "Trading votes: what drives MEP support for trade liberalisation?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119995, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Aukje van Loon, 2020. "The Selective Politicization of Transatlantic Trade Negotiations," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 325-335.
    15. Andrea C. Bianculli, 2020. "Politicization and Regional Integration in Latin America: Implications for EU–MERCOSUR Negotiations?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 254-265.
    16. Liesbet Hooghe, 2012. "The European Commission in the 21st Century - Core Beliefs on EU Governance," KFG Working Papers p0038, Free University Berlin.
    17. Kathleen R. McNamara, 2015. "JCMS Annual Review Lecture: Imagining Europe: The Cultural Foundations of EU Governance," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53, pages 22-39, September.
    18. Fabio Wasserfallen & Dirk Leuffen & Zdenek Kudrna & Hanno Degner, 2019. "Analysing European Union decision-making during the Eurozone crisis with new data," European Union Politics, , vol. 20(1), pages 3-23, March.
    19. Hua, Wei & Mitchell, Ronald K. & Mitchell, Benjamin T. & Mitchell, J. Robert & Israelsen, Trevor L., 2022. "Momentum for entrepreneurial internationalization: Friction at the interface between international and domestic institutions," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(6).
    20. Wagner, Wolfgang, 2011. "Negative and Positive Integration in EU Criminal Law Co-operation," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 15, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:60:y:2022:i:3:p:801-820. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.