IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v44y2006ip779-802.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

'Deliberative Political Processes' Revisited: What Have we Learnt About the Legitimacy of Supranational Decision-Making

Author

Listed:
  • CHRISTIAN JOERGES

Abstract

The 'comitology mode' of decision-making can be interpreted as a response to the non-unitary and non-hierarchical ('heterarchical') nature of the EU. It is of exemplary importance since it represents an institutionalized "sui generis" response to the regulatory needs of the 'multilevel system of governance "sui generis"' that characterizes Europe's political economy. Copyright 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Joerges, 2006. "'Deliberative Political Processes' Revisited: What Have we Learnt About the Legitimacy of Supranational Decision-Making," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44, pages 779-802, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:44:y:2006:i::p:779-802
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mario Savino, 2005. "The Constitutional Legitimacy of the EU Committees," Les Cahiers européens de Sciences Po 3, Centre d'études européennes (CEE) at Sciences Po, Paris.
    2. Joerges, Christian, 2001. "'Deliberative Supranationalism' A Defence," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 5, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Grimmel, Andreas, 2011. "Politics in robes? The European Court of Justice and the myth of judicial activism," Discussion Papers 2/11, Europa-Kolleg Hamburg, Institute for European Integration.
    2. Thomas Gehring & Michael Kerler, 2008. "Institutional Stimulation of Deliberative Decision-Making: Division of Labour, Deliberative Legitimacy and Technical Regulation in the European Single Market," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46, pages 1001-1023, December.
    3. Jens Blom-Hansen & Gijs Jan Brandsma, 2009. "The EU Comitology System: Intergovernmental Bargaining "and" Deliberative Supranationalism?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47, pages 719-740, September.
    4. Joerges, Christian, 2007. "Integration through de-legislation? An irritated heckler," European Governance Papers (EUROGOV) 3, CONNEX and EUROGOV networks.
    5. Saime Ozcurumez & Julinda Hoxha, 2015. "Conditional Deliberation: The Case of Joint Parliamentary Committees in the EU," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 642-657, May.
    6. Mayntz, Renate, 2007. "The architecture of multi-level governance of economic sectors," MPIfG Discussion Paper 07/13, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    7. Blatter, Joachim, 2018. "Transnationalizing democracy properly: Principles and rules for granting consociated citizens voting rights and partisan representation in the parliaments of nation states," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2018-102, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    8. Jens Blom‐Hansen & Gijs Jan Brandsma, 2009. "The EU Comitology System: Intergovernmental Bargaining and Deliberative Supranationalism?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(4), pages 719-740, September.
    9. Yannis Papadopoulos, 2018. "How does knowledge circulate in a regulatory network? Observing a European Platform of Regulatory Authorities meeting," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(4), pages 431-450, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christian Joerges; Jurgen Neyer, 2006. "Deliberative Supranationalism Revisited," EUI-LAW Working Papers 20, European University Institute (EUI), Department of Law.
    2. Cathrine Holst & John R. Moodie, 2015. "Cynical or Deliberative? An Analysis of the European Commission’s Public Communication on Its Use of Expertise in Policy-Making," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 37-48.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:44:y:2006:i::p:779-802. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.