IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamest/v36y1985i6p411-417.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structural equivalence in a psychology journal network

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Doreian

Abstract

Two journal‐to‐journal matrices for psychology in 1950 and 1960 are analyzed in terms of structural equivalence. Structurally nonequivalent positions have a strong correspondence with a categorization based on the intended audiences and objectives of these journals, supporting the hypothesis that journals of a discipline function as a status‐role relational system. The hypothesis that interdisciplinary journals are distant from journals of a field is also supported. However, the hypothesis that journal networks have a core‐periphery structure is not supported. The network of psychological journals has a discernable core, but not a clear core‐periphery structure. Some propositions concerning the causes and consequences of the structure of journal‐to‐journal networks for fields are advanced.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Doreian, 1985. "Structural equivalence in a psychology journal network," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 36(6), pages 411-417, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:36:y:1985:i:6:p:411-417
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.4630360611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360611
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.4630360611?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marian-Gabriel Hâncean & Matjaž Perc & Lazăr Vlăsceanu, 2014. "Fragmented Romanian Sociology: Growth and Structure of the Collaboration Network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-9, November.
    2. Pieters, R. & Baumgartner, H. & Vermunt, J.K. & Bijmolt, T.H.A., 1999. "Importance and similarity in the evolving citation network of the International Journal of Research in Marketing," Other publications TiSEM e2c16930-bf58-49ae-8cc9-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Giuditta De Prato & Daniel Nepelski, 2012. "Global R&D network. A network analysis of international R&D centres," JRC Research Reports JRC79478, Joint Research Centre, revised Nov 2012.
    4. Pieters, R. & Baumgartner, H. & Vermunt, J.K. & Bijmolt, T.H.A., 1998. "Importance, Cohesion and Structural Equivalence in the Evolving Citation Network of the International Journal of Research in Marketing," Other publications TiSEM 080e429b-d111-437e-9af3-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Richard Danell, 2000. "Stratification among Journals in Management Research: A Bibliometric Study of Interaction between European and American Journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 49(1), pages 23-38, August.
    6. Qingchun Li & Bryce Hannibal & Ali Mostafavi & Philip Berke & Sierra Woodruff & Arnold Vedlitz, 2020. "Examining of the actor collaboration networks around hazard mitigation: a hurricane harvey study," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(3), pages 3541-3562, September.
    7. Michael Brusco & Patrick Doreian, 2015. "An Exact Algorithm for the Two-Mode KL-Means Partitioning Problem," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 32(3), pages 481-515, October.
    8. Imran Ansari & Charu Sharma & Akshay Agrawal & Niteesh Sahni, 2024. "A novel portfolio construction strategy based on the core-periphery profile of stocks," Papers 2405.12993, arXiv.org.
    9. Pieters, R. & Baumgartner, H. & Vermunt, J.K. & Bijmolt, T.H.A., 1998. "Importance, Cohesion and Structural Equivalence in the Evolving Citation Network of the International Journal of Research in Marketing," Discussion Paper 1998-99, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:36:y:1985:i:6:p:411-417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.