IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v28y2024i4p953-965.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robust modeling of material flows to end‐uses under uncertainty: UK wood flows and material efficiency opportunities

Author

Listed:
  • R. L. Anspach
  • S. R. Allen
  • R. C. Lupton

Abstract

In this study we quantify wood flows from raw materials to end‐uses for the United Kingdom in a robust way using a new material flow analysis (MFA) model with uncertainty. This is important to identify opportunities for efficiency given constraints on wood supply. We have developed a new “ProbPACTOT” MFA model which introduces a systematic method to handle mixed units during reconciliation and uncertainty in data observations, conversion factors, and process recipes. This makes it possible to track material flows all the way to end‐uses, which is otherwise difficult because the diverse materials, data types, and units used to quantify end‐products are hard to integrate into standard allocation‐based MFA models. We apply the model for the case of wood in the United Kingdom by defining 56 process recipes and reconciling 117 data observations from various sources. The results quantify upstream production and trade flows, through to 19 specific end‐uses of wood fibers. We use this to show the potential scale of savings by enhancing material efficiency; for example, if pallets were used 25% more intensively, 0.49 ±$\pm$0.2 Mm3${\rm M}\mathrm{m^3}$ of wood fibers could be saved, corresponding to 4%–7% of the total soft sawnwood consumption of the United Kingdom. Judging the scale of opportunities for wood material efficiency in the United Kingdom is important domestically, and has global significance as the United Kingdom is the second largest net importer of wood products in the world. Moreover, this study proposes an important advancement in MFA giving a structure for modeling uncertain material flows up to end‐uses, applicable to any material. This article met the requirements for a gold‐gold JIE data openness badge described at http://jie.click/badges.

Suggested Citation

  • R. L. Anspach & S. R. Allen & R. C. Lupton, 2024. "Robust modeling of material flows to end‐uses under uncertainty: UK wood flows and material efficiency opportunities," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(4), pages 953-965, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:28:y:2024:i:4:p:953-965
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13511
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.13511?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meghan O’Brien & Stefan Bringezu, 2017. "What Is a Sustainable Level of Timber Consumption in the EU: Toward Global and EU Benchmarks for Sustainable Forest Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-18, May.
    2. David Laner & Julia Feketitsch & Helmut Rechberger & Johann Fellner, 2016. "A Novel Approach to Characterize Data Uncertainty in Material Flow Analysis and its Application to Plastics Flows in Austria," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 20(5), pages 1050-1063, October.
    3. Chihiro Kayo & Sébastien M.R. Dente & Chika Aoki‐Suzuki & Daisuke Tanaka & Shinsuke Murakami & Seiji Hashimoto, 2019. "Environmental Impact Assessment of Wood Use in Japan through 2050 Using Material Flow Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(3), pages 635-648, June.
    4. O'Brien, Meghan & Bringezu, Stefan, 2018. "European Timber Consumption: Developing a Method to Account for Timber Flows and the EU's Global Forest Footprint," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 322-332.
    5. Linbin Tang & Peng Wang & Zijie Ma & Stefan Pauliuk & Wei‐Qiang Chen & Tao Dai & Zipeng Lin, 2023. "Exploring the global trade networks of the tungsten supply chain: Insights into the physical and monetary mismatch among countries," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(1), pages 323-335, February.
    6. Richard C. Lupton & Julian M. Allwood, 2018. "Incremental Material Flow Analysis with Bayesian Inference," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(6), pages 1352-1364, December.
    7. Paoli, Leonardo & Lupton, Richard C. & Cullen, Jonathan M., 2018. "Useful energy balance for the UK: An uncertainty analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 176-188.
    8. Coenraad D. Westbroek & Jennifer Bitting & Matteo Craglia & José M. C. Azevedo & Jonathan M. Cullen, 2021. "Global material flow analysis of glass: From raw materials to end of life," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(2), pages 333-343, April.
    9. Stijn Van Ewijk & Julia A. Stegemann & Paul Ekins, 2018. "Global Life Cycle Paper Flows, Recycling Metrics, and Material Efficiency," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(4), pages 686-693, August.
    10. Drewniok, Michał P. & Dunant, Cyrille F. & Allwood, Julian M. & Ibell, Tim & Hawkins, Will, 2023. "Modelling the embodied carbon cost of UK domestic building construction: Today to 2050," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    11. Arno Pronk & Stijn Brancart & Fred Sanders, 2022. "Reusing Timber Formwork in Building Construction: Testing, Redesign, and Socio-Economic Reflection," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 81-96.
    12. Yicheol Han & Stephan J. Goetz & Claudia Schmidt, 2021. "Visualizing Spatial Economic Supply Chains to Enhance Sustainability and Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, February.
    13. Allwood, Julian M. & Ashby, Michael F. & Gutowski, Timothy G. & Worrell, Ernst, 2011. "Material efficiency: A white paper," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 362-381.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jörg Schweinle & Natalia Geng & Susanne Iost & Holger Weimar & Dominik Jochem, 2020. "Monitoring Sustainability Effects of the Bioeconomy: A Material Flow Based Approach Using the Example of Softwood Lumber and Its Core Product Epal 1 Pallet," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-27, March.
    2. Eric Masanet & Niko Heeren & Shigemi Kagawa & Jonathan Cullen & Reid Lifset & Richard Wood, 2021. "Material efficiency for climate change mitigation," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(2), pages 254-259, April.
    3. Guo, Tianjiao & Geng, Yong & Song, Xiaoqian & Rui, Xue & Ge, Zewen, 2023. "Tracing magnesium flows in China: A dynamic material flow analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    4. Gennady Osipov & Svetlana Karepova & Elena Chizhevskaya & Maxim Gnatyuk & Alexander Semin & Oksana Mikhayluk, 2018. "Directions To Improve The Effectiveness Of Russia s Energy Export Policy," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 8(6), pages 227-239.
    5. Yuancheng Lin & Honghua Yang & Linwei Ma & Zheng Li & Weidou Ni, 2021. "Low-Carbon Development for the Iron and Steel Industry in China and the World: Status Quo, Future Vision, and Key Actions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-28, November.
    6. Isaac Lyatuu & Georg Loss & Andrea Farnham & Goodluck W. Lyatuu & Günther Fink & Mirko S. Winkler, 2021. "Associations between Natural Resource Extraction and Incidence of Acute and Chronic Health Conditions: Evidence from Tanzania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-12, June.
    7. Jan Streeck & Quirin Dammerer & Dominik Wiedenhofer & Fridolin Krausmann, 2021. "The role of socio‐economic material stocks for natural resource use in the United States of America from 1870 to 2100," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(6), pages 1486-1502, December.
    8. Tsiliyannis, Christos Aristeides, 2015. "Sustainability by cyclic manufacturing: Assessment of resource preservation under uncertain growth and returns," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 155-170.
    9. Leonidas Milios, 2021. "Towards a Circular Economy Taxation Framework: Expectations and Challenges of Implementation," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 477-498, September.
    10. Dhar, Subash & Pathak, Minal & Shukla, Priyadarshi R., 2020. "Transformation of India's steel and cement industry in a sustainable 1.5 °C world," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    11. Brizga, Janis & Räty, Tarmo, 2024. "Production, consumption and trade-based forest land and resource footprints in the Nordic and Baltic countries," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    12. Ruth Lane, 2014. "Understanding the Dynamic Character of Value in Recycling Metals from Australia," Resources, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-16, April.
    13. Stefan Bringezu, 2019. "Toward Science-Based and Knowledge-Based Targets for Global Sustainable Resource Use," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-21, August.
    14. Mariale Moreno & Carolina De los Rios & Zoe Rowe & Fiona Charnley, 2016. "A Conceptual Framework for Circular Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-15, September.
    15. Colin M. Rose & Julia A. Stegemann, 2018. "From Waste Management to Component Management in the Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, January.
    16. Nguyet Thi Tran & Dirk Weichgrebe, 2020. "Regional material flow behaviors of agro‐food processing craft villages in Red River Delta, Vietnam," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(3), pages 707-725, June.
    17. Ardente, Fulvio & Mathieux, Fabrice & Recchioni, Marco, 2014. "Recycling of electronic displays: Analysis of pre-processing and potential ecodesign improvements," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 158-171.
    18. Magee, Christopher L. & Devezas, Tessaleno C., 2017. "A simple extension of dematerialization theory: Incorporation of technical progress and the rebound effect," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 196-205.
    19. Işık, Cem & Kuziboev, Bekhzod & Ongan, Serdar & Saidmamatov, Olimjon & Mirkhoshimova, Mokhirakhon & Rajabov, Alibek, 2024. "The volatility of global energy uncertainty: Renewable alternatives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    20. Chembessi Chedrak & Gohoungodji Paulin & Juste Rajaonson, 2023. "“A fine wine, better with age”: Circular economy historical roots and influential publications: A bibliometric analysis using Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS)," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(6), pages 1593-1612, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:28:y:2024:i:4:p:953-965. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.