IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v26y2022i5p1796-1808.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life cycle assessment of an industrial‐scale vanadium flow battery

Author

Listed:
  • Nick Blume
  • Maik Becker
  • Thomas Turek
  • Christine Minke

Abstract

In the course of the energy transition, storage technologies are required for the fluctuating and intermittently occurring electrical energy. The vanadium flow battery (VFB) is an especially promising electrochemical battery type for megawatt applications due to its unique characteristics. This work is intended as a benchmark for the evaluation of environmental impacts of a VFB, providing transparency and traceability. It considers the requirements for an industrial VFB from the technical and electrochemical point of view. The system design is based on a net capacity of 8 MWh and a net power of 1 MW. This ex ante study is a cradle‐to‐grave life cycle assessment (LCA) for a VFB to identify, analyze, and evaluate the environmental impacts for a lifetime of 20 years. Moreover, potential environmental impacts of several subsequent life cycles of the emission‐intensive and long‐lasting vanadium electrolyte are evaluated. With a focus on the electrolyte, the extraction process of vanadium pentoxide is studied in detail for the first time. Consequently, recommendations for the design of the life cycle of VFBs and for comparative LCAs with other energy storage technologies can be derived. Based on this work, more detailed work can follow, which helps to estimate the recycling potentials and emissions more precisely. This article met the requirements for a gold‐gold JIE data openness badge described at https://jie.click/badges

Suggested Citation

  • Nick Blume & Maik Becker & Thomas Turek & Christine Minke, 2022. "Life cycle assessment of an industrial‐scale vanadium flow battery," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(5), pages 1796-1808, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:26:y:2022:i:5:p:1796-1808
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13328
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.13328?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matilda Axelson & Sebastian Oberthür & Lars J. Nilsson, 2021. "Emission reduction strategies in the EU steel industry: Implications for business model innovation," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(2), pages 390-402, April.
    2. Pietro A. Renzulli & Bruno Notarnicola & Giuseppe Tassielli & Gabriella Arcese & Rosa Di Capua, 2016. "Life Cycle Assessment of Steel Produced in an Italian Integrated Steel Mill," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Dolf Gielen & Deger Saygin & Emanuele Taibi & Jean‐Pierre Birat, 2020. "Renewables‐based decarbonization and relocation of iron and steel making: A case study," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(5), pages 1113-1125, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khusniddin Alikulov & Zarif Aminov & La Hoang Anh & Tran Dang Xuan & Wookyung Kim, 2024. "Comparative Technical and Economic Analyses of Hydrogen-Based Steel and Power Sectors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-30, March.
    2. Toktarova, Alla & Walter, Viktor & Göransson, Lisa & Johnsson, Filip, 2022. "Interaction between electrified steel production and the north European electricity system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    3. Lopez, Gabriel & Galimova, Tansu & Fasihi, Mahdi & Bogdanov, Dmitrii & Breyer, Christian, 2023. "Towards defossilised steel: Supply chain options for a green European steel industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    4. Alejandro Padilla-Rivera & Ben Amor & Pierre Blanchet, 2018. "Evaluating the Link between Low Carbon Reductions Strategies and Its Performance in the Context of Climate Change: A Carbon Footprint of a Wood-Frame Residential Building in Quebec, Canada," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Elena Simina Lakatos & Mircea Florentin Vlad & Roxana Lavinia Pacurariu & Andrea Szilagyi & Doris Cadar, 2021. "A New, Consonant Approach of Circular Economy Based on the Conservation of the Fundamental Scalars of Physics," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 745-759, September.
    6. Enora Barrau & Mathias Glaus, 2022. "Structural and Environmental Performance of Evolving Industrial Symbiosis: A Multidimensional Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Siavashi, Majid & Hosseini, Farzad & Talesh Bahrami, Hamid Reza, 2021. "A new design with preheating and layered porous ceramic for hydrogen production through methane steam reforming process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    8. Peter Klimek & Maximilian Hess & Markus Gerschberger & Stefan Thurner, 2024. "Circular transformation of the European steel industry renders scrap metal a strategic resource," Papers 2406.12098, arXiv.org.
    9. Mohammadtaghi Falsafi & Rosanna Fornasiero, 2022. "Explorative Multiple-Case Research on the Scrap-Based Steel Slag Value Chain: Opportunities for Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    10. Pinto, Edwin S. & Gronier, Timothé & Franquet, Erwin & Serra, Luis M., 2023. "Opportunities and economic assessment for a third-party delivering electricity, heat and cold to residential buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    11. Giuseppina Colaleo & Federico Nardo & Arianna Azzellino & Diego Vicinanza, 2022. "Decommissioning of Offshore Platforms in Adriatic Sea: The Total Removal Option from a Life Cycle Assessment Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Laura Moretti & Vittorio Mandrone & Antonio D’Andrea & Silvia Caro, 2017. "Comparative “from Cradle to Gate” Life Cycle Assessments of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Kristoffer W. Lie & Trym A. Synnevåg & Jacob J. Lamb & Kristian M. Lien, 2021. "The Carbon Footprint of Electrified City Buses: A Case Study in Trondheim, Norway," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, February.
    14. Barbera, Elena & Naurzaliyev, Rustem & Asiedu, Alexander & Bertucco, Alberto & Resurreccion, Eleazer P. & Kumar, Sandeep, 2020. "Techno-economic analysis and life-cycle assessment of jet fuels production from waste cooking oil via in situ catalytic transfer hydrogenation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 428-449.
    15. Rainer Radloff & Ali Abdelshafy & Grit Walther, 2023. "An integrative and prospective approach to regional material flow analysis: Modeling the decarbonization of the North Rhine‐Westphalian steel industry," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(3), pages 662-675, June.
    16. Julian Suer & Marzia Traverso & Nils Jäger, 2022. "Review of Life Cycle Assessments for Steel and Environmental Analysis of Future Steel Production Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, October.
    17. Peter Klimek & Maximilian Hess & Markus Gerschberger & Stefan Thurner, 2024. "Circular Transformation of the European Steel Industry Renders Scrap Metal a Strategic Resource," ASCII Working Papers 003, Supply Chain Intelligence Institute Austria.
    18. Pim Vercoulen & Soocheol Lee & Xu Han & Wendan Zhang & Yongsung Cho & Jun Pang, 2023. "Carbon-Neutral Steel Production and Its Impact on the Economies of China, Japan, and Korea: A Simulation with E3ME-FTT:Steel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-24, June.
    19. Ren, Lei & Zhou, Sheng & Peng, Tianduo & Ou, Xunmin, 2021. "A review of CO2 emissions reduction technologies and low-carbon development in the iron and steel industry focusing on China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    20. Fengjiao Ma & A. Egrinya Eneji & Yanbin Wu, 2018. "An Evaluation of Input–Output Value for Sustainability in a Chinese Steel Production System Based on Emergy Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:26:y:2022:i:5:p:1796-1808. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.