IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v26y2022i1p240-251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison study of bottom‐up and top‐down methods for analyzing the physical composition of municipal solid waste

Author

Listed:
  • Chuanbin Zhou
  • Shijun Ma
  • Xiao Yu
  • Zhuqi Chen
  • Jingru Liu
  • Li Yan

Abstract

Municipal solid waste (MSW) management is a crucial issue in socioeconomic metabolism and requires multicategory and high‐resolution data, and data on the physical composition of municipal solid waste (PCMSW) are fundamental in MSW research. Extensive financial resources have been invested in the research on field investigations of PCMSW; however, it is time‐consuming and sometimes not truly representative of the studied case. In this work, two bottom‐up and two top‐down approaches were applied for analyzing the PCMSW, namely, field investigation (FI), BP neural network (BPNN), material flow analysis (MFA), and inversion algorithm based on electricity generation of waste incinerator (IAEI). Wuhan City, China, was chosen as the studied case for analyzing and comparing the PCMSW results. The PCMSW values obtained by applying those four methods showed acceptable differences, and the standard deviations of organic fraction, ash and stone, paper, plastic and rubber, textile, wood, metal, glass, and others were 3.94%, 2.77%, 6.57%, 2.22%, 2.49%, 1.36%, 0.53%, 1.19%, and 0.28%, respectively. Use of the MFA, BPNN, and IAEI methods could reduce time and labor spent on manual sampling, sorting, and weighing of MSW, compared to the FI method. BPNN algorithm advances in providing PCMSW data in history and by trajectory throughout the year, whereas IAEI contributes PCMSW data with much higher temporal resolution. Data quality and applicability of different methods were discussed, considering the availability of time, labor, and reference data.

Suggested Citation

  • Chuanbin Zhou & Shijun Ma & Xiao Yu & Zhuqi Chen & Jingru Liu & Li Yan, 2022. "A comparison study of bottom‐up and top‐down methods for analyzing the physical composition of municipal solid waste," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(1), pages 240-251, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:26:y:2022:i:1:p:240-251
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13128
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.13128?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Huiwen & Liu, Qiang & Mok, Henry M.K. & Fu, Linghui & Tse, Wai Man, 2007. "A hyperspherical transformation forecasting model for compositional data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(2), pages 459-468, June.
    2. Jon T. Powell & Timothy G. Townsend & Julie B. Zimmerman, 2016. "Estimates of solid waste disposal rates and reduction targets for landfill gas emissions," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(2), pages 162-165, February.
    3. Koji Takase & Yasushi Kondo & Ayu Washizu, 2005. "An Analysis of Sustainable Consumption by the Waste Input‐Output Model," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 9(1‐2), pages 201-219, January.
    4. Hiroki Tanikawa & Tomer Fishman & Keijiro Okuoka & Kenji Sugimoto, 2015. "The Weight of Society Over Time and Space: A Comprehensive Account of the Construction Material Stock of Japan, 1945–2010," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 19(5), pages 778-791, October.
    5. Tomer Fishman & Heinz Schandl & Hiroki Tanikawa & Paul Walker & Fridolin Krausmann, 2014. "Accounting for the Material Stock of Nations," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 18(3), pages 407-420, May.
    6. Zhou, Chuanbin & Huang, Heping & Cao, Aixin & Xu, Wanying, 2015. "Modeling the carbon cycle of the municipal solid waste management system for urban metabolism," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 318(C), pages 150-156.
    7. Stefan Pauliuk & Guillaume Majeau-Bettez & Daniel B. Müller, 2015. "A General System Structure and Accounting Framework for Socioeconomic Metabolism," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 19(5), pages 728-741, October.
    8. Jon T. Powell & Marian R. Chertow, 2019. "Quantity, Components, and Value of Waste Materials Landfilled in the United States," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(2), pages 466-479, April.
    9. Denafas, Gintaras & Ruzgas, Tomas & Martuzevičius, Dainius & Shmarin, Sergey & Hoffmann, Michael & Mykhaylenko, Valeriy & Ogorodnik, Stanislav & Romanov, Mikhail & Neguliaeva, Ekaterina & Chusov, Alex, 2014. "Seasonal variation of municipal solid waste generation and composition in four East European cities," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 22-30.
    10. Oguchi, Masahiro & Kameya, Takashi & Yagi, Suguru & Urano, Kohei, 2008. "Product flow analysis of various consumer durables in Japan," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 463-480.
    11. Christopher M. Chini & Ashlynn S. Stillwell, 2019. "The metabolism of U.S. cities 2.0," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(6), pages 1353-1362, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mathieu, Valentin & Roda, Jean-Marc, 2023. "A meta-analysis on wood trade flow modeling concepts," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    2. Yoshida, Keisuke & Fishman, Tomer & Okuoka, Keijiro & Tanikawa, Hiroki, 2017. "Material stock's overburden: Automatic spatial detection and estimation of domestic extraction and hidden material flows," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 165-175.
    3. Edgar Battand Towa Kouokam & Vanessa Zeller & Wouter Achten, 2019. "Input-output models and waste management analysis: A critical review," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/359535, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    4. Faye Duchin, 2017. "Resources for Sustainable Economic Development: A Framework for Evaluating Infrastructure System Alternatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, November.
    5. Fishman, Tomer & Schandl, Heinz & Tanikawa, Hiroki, 2015. "The socio-economic drivers of material stock accumulation in Japan's prefectures," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 76-84.
    6. Miatto, Alessio & Schandl, Heinz & Tanikawa, Hiroki, 2017. "How important are realistic building lifespan assumptions for material stock and demolition waste accounts?," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 143-154.
    7. Charles Gillott & Will Mihkelson & Maud Lanau & Dave Cheshire & Danielle Densley Tingley, 2023. "Developing Regenerate: A circular economy engagement tool for the assessment of new and existing buildings," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(2), pages 423-435, April.
    8. Yupeng Liu & Jiajia Li & Wei‐Qiang Chen & Lulu Song & Shaoqing Dai, 2022. "Quantifying urban mass gain and loss by a GIS‐based material stocks and flows analysis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 1051-1060, June.
    9. Franz Schug & David Frantz & Dominik Wiedenhofer & Helmut Haberl & Doris Virág & Sebastian van der Linden & Patrick Hostert, 2023. "High‐resolution mapping of 33 years of material stock and population growth in Germany using Earth Observation data," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(1), pages 110-124, February.
    10. Natthanij Soonsawad & Raymundo Marcos‐Martinez & Heinz Schandl, 2024. "City‐scale assessment of the material and environmental footprint of buildings using an advanced building information model: A case study from Canberra, Australia," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(2), pages 247-261, April.
    11. Namya Sharma & Pradip P. Kalbar & Muhammad Salman, 2024. "Development of building stock model for an emerging city in India: Learnings for enabling circular economy in the built environment," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(4), pages 751-767, August.
    12. Miatto, Alessio & Schandl, Heinz & Wiedenhofer, Dominik & Krausmann, Fridolin & Tanikawa, Hiroki, 2017. "Modeling material flows and stocks of the road network in the United States 1905–2015," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 168-178.
    13. Wiedenhofer, Dominik & Fishman, Tomer & Lauk, Christian & Haas, Willi & Krausmann, Fridolin, 2019. "Integrating Material Stock Dynamics Into Economy-Wide Material Flow Accounting: Concepts, Modelling, and Global Application for 1900–2050," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 121-133.
    14. Pauliuk, Stefan & Hertwich, Edgar G., 2015. "Socioeconomic metabolism as paradigm for studying the biophysical basis of human societies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 83-93.
    15. Lwin, Cherry Myo & Dente, Sébastien M.R. & Wang, Tao & Shimizu, Toshiyuki & Hashimoto, Seiji, 2017. "Material stock disparity and factors affecting stocked material use efficiency of sewer pipelines in Japan," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 135-142.
    16. Shogo Eguchi, 2017. "Accounting for resource accumulation in Japanese prefectures: an environmental efficiency analysis," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 6(1), pages 1-22, December.
    17. Augiseau, Vincent & Barles, Sabine, 2017. "Studying construction materials flows and stock: A review," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 153-164.
    18. Chenling Fu & Yan Zhang & Tianjie Deng & Ichiro Daigo, 2022. "The evolution of material stock research: From exploring to rising to hot studies," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(2), pages 462-476, April.
    19. Gerber, Julien-François & Scheidel, Arnim, 2018. "In Search of Substantive Economics: Comparing Today's Two Major Socio-metabolic Approaches to the Economy – MEFA and MuSIASEM," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 186-194.
    20. Cao, Zhi & Shen, Lei & Liu, Litao & Zhao, Jianan & Zhong, Shuai & Kong, Hanxiao & Sun, Yanzhi, 2017. "Estimating the in-use cement stock in China: 1920–2013," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 21-31.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:26:y:2022:i:1:p:240-251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.