IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v25y2021i6p1412-1429.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multi‐criteria decision‐making approach for assembling optimal powertrain technology portfolios in low GHG emission environments

Author

Listed:
  • Florian Kellner
  • Bernhard Lienland
  • Sebastian Utz

Abstract

Environmental regulations force car manufacturers to renew the powertrain technology portfolio offered to the customer to comply with greenhouse gas (GHG) emission targets. In turn, automotive companies face the task of identifying the “right” powertrain technology portfolio consisting of, for example, internal combustion engines and electric vehicles, because the selection of a particular powertrain technology portfolio affects different company targets simultaneously. What makes this decision even more challenging is that future market shares of the different technologies are uncertain. Our research presents a new decision‐support approach for assembling optimal powertrain technology portfolios while making decision‐makers aware of the trade‐offs between the achievable profit, the achievable market share, the market share risk, and the GHG emissions generated by the selected vehicle fleet. The proposed approach combines “a posteriori” decision‐making with multi‐objective optimization. In an application case, we feed the outlooks of selected market studies into the proposed decision‐support system. The result is a visualization and analysis of the current real‐world decision‐making problem faced by many automotive companies. Our findings indicate that for the proposed GHG restriction at work in 2030 in the European Union, no optimal powertrain technology portfolio with less than 35% of vehicles equipped with an electric motor exists.

Suggested Citation

  • Florian Kellner & Bernhard Lienland & Sebastian Utz, 2021. "A multi‐criteria decision‐making approach for assembling optimal powertrain technology portfolios in low GHG emission environments," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(6), pages 1412-1429, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:25:y:2021:i:6:p:1412-1429
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13148
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.13148?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abdul Ali & Manohar U. Kalwani & Dan Kovenock, 1993. "Selecting Product Development Projects: Pioneering versus Incremental Innovation Strategies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 255-274, March.
    2. V. Krishnan & Karl T. Ulrich, 2001. "Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(1), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Patrick Plötz & Simon Árpád Funke & Patrick Jochem, 2018. "Empirical Fuel Consumption and CO2 Emissions of Plug‐In Hybrid Electric Vehicles," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(4), pages 773-784, August.
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/12570 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. David, Albert, 2001. "Models implementation: A state of the art," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(3), pages 459-480, November.
    6. Karsten Kieckhäfer & Thomas Volling & Thomas Stefan Spengler, 2012. "Supporting Strategic Product Portfolio Planning by Market Simulation," Springer Books, in: Adamantios Diamantopoulos & Wolfgang Fritz & Lutz Hildebrandt (ed.), Quantitative Marketing and Marketing Management, edition 127, chapter 6, pages 123-147, Springer.
    7. John D. C. Little, 2004. "Models and Managers: The Concept of a Decision Calculus," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(12_supple), pages 1841-1853, December.
    8. Gómez Vilchez, Jonatan J. & Jochem, Patrick, 2019. "Simulating vehicle fleet composition: A review of system dynamics models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    9. Jack Byrd, Jr. & L. Ted Moore, 1978. "The Application of a Product Mix Linear Programming Model in Corporate Policy Making," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(13), pages 1342-1350, September.
    10. Mansfield, Edwin & Wagner, Samuel, 1975. "Organizational and Strategic Factors Associated with Probabilities of Success in Industrial R & D," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 48(2), pages 179-198, April.
    11. Harry Markowitz, 1956. "The optimization of a quadratic function subject to linear constraints," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(1‐2), pages 111-133, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christian Thies & Christoph Hüls & Karsten Kieckhäfer & Jörg Wansart & Thomas S. Spengler, 2022. "Project portfolio planning under CO2 fleet emission restrictions in the automotive industry," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 937-951, June.
    2. Elizabeth Webster & Paul H. Jensen, 2009. "Macroeconomic Conditions and Successful Commercialization," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2009n09, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    3. V. Krishnan & Karl T. Ulrich, 2001. "Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(1), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Scott A. Shane & Karl T. Ulrich, 2004. "50th Anniversary Article: Technological Innovation, Product Development, and Entrepreneurship in Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 133-144, February.
    5. Schicker, Günter & Strassl, Johann, 2015. "A call for action - warum sich das professionelle Managementdes Service Portfolios in der Industrie auszahlt," Weidener Diskussionspapiere 53, University of Applied Sciences Amberg-Weiden (OTH).
    6. Schicker, Günter & Strassl, Johann, 2019. "Produktportfolio-Management im Zeitalter der Digitalisierung," Weidener Diskussionspapiere 69, University of Applied Sciences Amberg-Weiden (OTH).
    7. Claude Paraponaris, 2017. "Plateformes numériques, conception ouverte et emploi," Post-Print halshs-01614430, HAL.
    8. Manuel E. Sosa & Steven D. Eppinger & Craig M. Rowles, 2004. "The Misalignment of Product Architecture and Organizational Structure in Complex Product Development," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(12), pages 1674-1689, December.
    9. Avlonitis, George J. & Salavou, Helen E., 2007. "Entrepreneurial orientation of SMEs, product innovativeness, and performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(5), pages 566-575, May.
    10. Thomas Bolli & Martin Woerter, 2013. "Technological Diversification and Innovation Performance," KOF Working papers 13-336, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich.
    11. Zhang, Yibin & Hafezi, Maryam & Zhao, Xuan & Shi, Victor, 2017. "Reprint of “The impact of development cost on product line design and its environmental performance”," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 126-134.
    12. Hazhir Rahmandad & Nelson Repenning, 2016. "Capability erosion dynamics," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 649-672, April.
    13. Beltran-Royo, C. & Zhang, H. & Blanco, L.A. & Almagro, J., 2013. "Multistage multiproduct advertising budgeting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 179-188.
    14. Christian Terwiesch & Yi Xu, 2008. "Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(9), pages 1529-1543, September.
    15. Bookhagen, Andrea & Sperber, Sonja, 2017. "Kundenintegration in den Entwicklungsprozess von Produktinnovationen durch Crowdsourcing," PraxisWISSEN Marketing: German Journal of Marketing, AfM – Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Marketing, vol. 2(01/2017), pages 21-37.
    16. Haapalinna, Ilkka, 2003. "How to allocate funds within the army," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 224-233, January.
    17. Wallace J. Hopp & Xiaowei Xu, 2005. "Product Line Selection and Pricing with Modularity in Design," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 7(3), pages 172-187, August.
    18. Eleonora Bartoloni & Maurizio Baussola, 2015. "Persistent Product Innovation and Market-oriented Behaviour: the Impact on Firms' Performance," DISCE - Quaderni del Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali dises1505, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
    19. Aditya Vedantam & Ananth Iyer, 2021. "Capacity Investment under Bayesian Information Updates at Reporting Periods: Model and Application," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(8), pages 2707-2725, August.
    20. Barry L. Bayus, 2013. "Crowdsourcing New Product Ideas over Time: An Analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm Community," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 226-244, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:25:y:2021:i:6:p:1412-1429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.