IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v39y2015i3p533-549.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

We Blame the Building! The Architecture of Distributed Responsibility

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Beauregard

Abstract

type="main"> This article makes use of actor-network theory to reflect on how responsibility is distributed when efforts are made to change the built environment. More specifically, it is concerned with the way in which humans delegate responsibility to non-human things and how these non-human things then function as actors within heterogeneous settings. The overall intent is to erase the divide between culture and nature, human subjectivity and vibrant matter, and thereby change our relationship to ‘the city'. The argument is embedded in and illustrated by an architectural controversy that unfolded in New York City in late 2013 and early 2014 around the demolition by the Museum of Modern Art of an award-winning and relatively new building––the American Folk Art Museum.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Beauregard, 2015. "We Blame the Building! The Architecture of Distributed Responsibility," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 533-549, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:39:y:2015:i:3:p:533-549
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1468-2427.12232
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joerges, Bernward, 1999. "Do Politics have Artefacts," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 29(3), pages 411-431.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Busra Dilaveroglu & Cigdem Polatoglu & Aysen Ciravoglu, 2021. "A Review on Actor-Network Theory as a Potential Tool for Architectural Studies," Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, Eurasian Publications, vol. 9(1), pages 44-60.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Potthast, Jörg, 2001. "Wenn Riesen tanzen lernen: Großflughäfen und Flexibilisierung aus wartungssoziologischer Perspektive," Discussion Papers, Research Group Metropolitan City Studies FS II 01-501, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    2. Ivana Suboticki & Knut H. Sørensen, 2021. "Designing and domesticating an interstructure: Exploring the practices and the politics of an elevator for cyclists," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(6), pages 1229-1244, May.
    3. Pansera, Mario & Lloveras, Javier & Durrant, Daniel, 2024. "The infrastructural conditions of (de-)growth: The case of the internet," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    4. James Porter & David Demeritt, 2012. "Flood-Risk Management, Mapping, and Planning: The Institutional Politics of Decision Support in England," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(10), pages 2359-2378, October.
    5. Kerschner, Christian & Ehlers, Melf-Hinrich, 2016. "A framework of attitudes towards technology in theory and practice," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 139-151.
    6. Fatimah, Yuti Ariani & Raven, Rob P.J.M. & Arora, Saurabh, 2015. "Scripts in transition: Protective spaces of Indonesian biofuel villages," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1-13.
    7. Mascha Gugganig & Karly Ann Burch & Julie Guthman & Kelly Bronson, 2023. "Contested agri-food futures: Introduction to the Special Issue," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 787-798, September.
    8. Liisa Horelli & Sirkku Wallin, 2023. "The Renewal of the Finnish Planning Legislation as a Strategy of Urban Planning and Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:39:y:2015:i:3:p:533-549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.