IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v34y2010i1p163-173.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building and Contesting Neoliberalism at the Local Level: Reflections on the Symposium and on Recent Experience in Bolivia

Author

Listed:
  • MIKE GEDDES

Abstract

This final article first reflects on the previous articles in the symposium, positioning the diverse trajectories of local governance which they exhibit in relation to two contrasting ideal types — the one neoliberal, the other contesting neoliberalism from a progressive, left perspective. Differences between these ideal types, and among the actually existing patterns of local governance discussed in the symposium (in relation to their economic and social objectives and governance institutions and practices) are highlighted. The second part of the article offers a consideration of local governance in Bolivia, a country which encapsulates some of the key issues at stake in the ongoing struggles to either build, or contest, neoliberalism at the local level. Here a distinction is advanced between ‘expansive’ and ‘consolidatory’ moments of neoliberal local governance, which may take the form of consecutive phases, but may have different, overlapping temporalities. In conclusion, it is suggested the challenges which the impact of the financial crisis and global recession pose both to neoliberal forms of local governance and to contestatory forces should be a primary concern for future research. Résumé Ce dernier article revient d’abord sur les articles précédents du symposium, pour replacer les diverses voies de gouvernance locale présentées par rapport à deux idéaltypes mis en opposition: l’un néolibéral, l’autre contestant le néolibéralisme d’un point de vue progressiste de gauche. Il met en évidence les différences entre ces idéaltypes, et entre les modèles actuels de gouvernance locale débattus dans le symposium (en lien avec leurs objectifs économiques et sociaux et avec les institutions et pratiques de gouvernance). La seconde partie s’intéresse à la gouvernance locale en Bolivie, un pays qui incarne certains des principaux enjeux dans les luttes en cours visant à bâtir ou à contester un néolibéralisme au niveau local. Une distinction est proposée entre les moments d’‘expansion’ et de ‘consolidation’ de la gouvernance locale néolibérale, lesquels peuvent se présenter de manière consécutive, mais aussi sur des plages temporelles différentes en chevauchement. Pour conclure, les défis que les conséquences de la crise financière et la récession mondiale posent aux formes néolibérales de gouvernance locale ainsi qu’aux forces contestataires devraient constituer une priorité dans les recherches à venir.

Suggested Citation

  • Mike Geddes, 2010. "Building and Contesting Neoliberalism at the Local Level: Reflections on the Symposium and on Recent Experience in Bolivia," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 163-173, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:34:y:2010:i:1:p:163-173
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00955.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00955.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00955.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Georgina Blakeley, 2010. "Governing Ourselves: Citizen Participation and Governance in Barcelona and Manchester," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 130-145, March.
    2. Benjamin Goldfrank & Andrew Schrank, 2009. "Municipal Neoliberalism and Municipal Socialism: Urban Political Economy in Latin America," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 443-462, June.
    3. Mike Marinetto, 2003. "Governing beyond the Centre: A Critique of the Anglo-Governance School," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 51, pages 592-608, October.
    4. Yves Sintomer & Carsten Herzberg & Anja Röcke, 2008. "Participatory Budgeting in Europe: Potentials and Challenges," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 164-178, March.
    5. Thomas Perreault, 2005. "State Restructuring and the Scale Politics of Rural Water Governance in Bolivia," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(2), pages 263-284, February.
    6. Faguet, Jean-Paul, 2005. "The effects of decentralisation on public investment: evidence and four lessons from Bolivia and Colombia," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 480, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Mike Geddes, 2006. "Partnership and the Limits to Local Governance in England: Institutionalist Analysis and Neoliberalism," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 76-97, March.
    8. Thomas Perreault & Patricia Martin, 2005. "Geographies of Neoliberalism in Latin America," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(2), pages 191-201, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Valeria Guarneros‐Meza & Mike Geddes, 2010. "Local Governance and Participation under Neoliberalism: Comparative Perspectives," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 115-129, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valeria Guarneros‐Meza & Mike Geddes, 2010. "Local Governance and Participation under Neoliberalism: Comparative Perspectives," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 115-129, March.
    2. Santiago Eizaguirre & Marc Pradel & Albert Terrones & Xavier Martinez-Celorrio & Marisol García, 2012. "Multilevel Governance and Social Cohesion: Bringing Back Conflict in Citizenship Practices," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(9), pages 1999-2016, July.
    3. Hilary Silver & Alan Scott & Yuri Kazepov, 2010. "Participation in Urban Contention and Deliberation," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 453-477, September.
    4. Noel Castree, 2008. "Neoliberalising Nature: Processes, Effects, and Evaluations," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(1), pages 153-173, January.
    5. Mike Geddes, 2014. "Neoliberalism and local governance: Radical developments in Latin America," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(15), pages 3147-3163, November.
    6. Micael Sousa, 2024. "Moving Pieces and Allocating Budget Together: A Framework for Using Analog Serious Games in Sustainable Collaborative Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-24, September.
    7. Cuenca Botey, Luis Emilio & Célérier, Laure, 2023. "On the relentless labour of deconstructing domination logics: The case of decolonial critical accounting research in South America," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    8. Ismael Blanco, 2013. "Analysing Urban Governance Networks: Bringing Regime Theory Back in," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(2), pages 276-291, April.
    9. Lyall, Catherine & Tait, Joyce, 2019. "Beyond the limits to governance: New rules of engagement for the tentative governance of the life sciences," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(5), pages 1128-1137.
    10. Heather M Watkins, 2017. "Beyond sweat equity: Community organising beyond the Third Way," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(9), pages 2139-2154, July.
    11. Aurora Castro Teixeira & Maria João Barros, 2014. "Local municipalities’ involvement in promoting the internationalisation of SMEs," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 29(1-2), pages 141-162, February.
    12. Janet Newman, 2014. "Landscapes of antagonism: Local governance, neoliberalism and austerity," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(15), pages 3290-3305, November.
    13. Grillos, Tara, 2017. "Participatory Budgeting and the Poor: Tracing Bias in a Multi-Staged Process in Solo, Indonesia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 343-358.
    14. Dale, Elina & Peacocke, Elizabeth F. & Movik, Espen & Voorhoeve, Alex & Ottersen, Trygve & Kurowski, Christoph & Evans, David B. & Norheim, Ole Frithjof & Gopinathan, Unni, 2023. "Criteria for the procedural fairness of health financing decisions: a scoping review," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119799, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Gavin Parker & Emma Street, 2015. "Planning at the neighbourhood scale: localism, dialogic politics, and the modulation of community action," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(4), pages 794-810, August.
    16. Philipp Horn & Diana Mitlin & Jhono Bennett & Beth Chitekwe-Biti & Jack Makau, 2018. "Towards citywide participatory planning: emerging community-led practices in three African cities," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 342018, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    17. Suhartono Suhartono & Roy Valiant Salomo & Umanto Eko Prasetyo, 2022. "The Alignment Challenges of Development Planning and Budgeting: Insights from Indonesia," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 34(1), pages 54-83, August.
    18. Swianiewicz Paweł, 2014. "Intra-Municipal Units in Urban Political Systems in Poland: Vicious Roundabout of Marginalization or Dead-End Street ?," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 7(2), pages 173-198, December.
    19. Carla Huisman, 2014. "Displacement Through Participation," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 105(2), pages 161-174, April.
    20. Benedikt Hora, 2018. "Private Protection Initiatives in Mountain Areas of Southern Chile and Their Perceived Impact on Local Development—The Case of Pumalín Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-22, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:34:y:2010:i:1:p:163-173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.