IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v32y2008i3p604-616.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recognizing Urban Public Space as a Co‐Educator: Children's Socialization in Ghent

Author

Listed:
  • SVEN DE VISSCHER
  • MARIA BOUVERNE‐DE BIE

Abstract

This article discusses how urban public space impacts upon children's socialization. There are two points of view on the relationship between children and the urban neighbourhood, whether one considers the position of children in urban public space or the position of this environment in children's socialization. One can define the relationship in terms of the need to protect children against the perils of the city; this results in a spatial segregation of children into separate (play) spaces. Alternatively, one can argue that children should be able to move independently and safely through urban public space in order to make full use of the socializing opportunities offered by the city; this results in criteria for a child‐friendly city. Leaving aside abstract images of the ideal neighbourhood for children, urban public space should also be considered as a co‐educator. Theories of urban public space as a co‐educator require empirical information about the way in which this space impacts upon existing processes of socialization and the citizenship of children. Three cases from the city of Ghent are presented to illustrate this discussion. Résumé Cet article étudie comment l'espace public urbain agit sur la socialisation des enfants. Il existe deux points de vue sur la relation entre enfants et voisinage urbain, selon que l'on considère la situation des enfants dans l'espace public urbain, ou la situation de cet environnement dans leur socialisation. On peut établir la relation en privilégiant la nécessité de protéger les enfants des périls de la ville, ce qui se traduit pour eux par une ségrégation spatiale dans des espaces (de jeu) séparés. Ou bien on affirme que les enfants devraient pouvoir se déplacer de façon autonome et sûre dans tout l'espace public urbain afin de profiter pleinement des possibilités de socialisation qu'offre la ville, le résultat étant alors la définition de critères pour une ville adaptée aux enfants. En laissant de côté l'imagerie abstraite d'un voisinage idéal pour l'enfant, il faudrait aussi envisager l'espace public urbain comme un co‐éducateur. Les théories sur l'espace public urbain en tant que co‐éducateur ont besoin de données empiriques sur la manière dont cet espace influence les processus existants de socialisation et d'acquisition de la citoyenneté pour les enfants. Afin d'illustrer cette analyse, il est présenté trois cas situés dans la ville de Gand.

Suggested Citation

  • Sven De Visscher & Maria Bouverne‐De Bie, 2008. "Recognizing Urban Public Space as a Co‐Educator: Children's Socialization in Ghent," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 604-616, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:32:y:2008:i:3:p:604-616
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00798.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00798.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00798.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pascal De Decker & Christian Kesteloot & Filip De Maesschalck & Jan Vranken, 2005. "Revitalizing the City in an Anti‐Urban Context: Extreme Right and the Rise of Urban Policies in Flanders, Belgium," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 152-171, March.
    2. Sako Musterd & Mariïılle De Winter, 1998. "Conditions for spatial segregation: some European perspectives," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(4), pages 665-673, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yucel Can Severcan, 2018. "Changing places, changing childhoods: Regeneration and children’s use of place in Istanbul," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(10), pages 2179-2196, August.
    2. Cibele Mariano Vaz Macêdo & Monique Gil & Miriam Raquel Wachholz Strelhow, 2022. "Urban Mobility and Subjective Well-Being among Brazilian Children," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 15(2), pages 467-485, April.
    3. Mattias De Backer, 2019. "Class, Style and Territory in the Drari Microcultures of Brussels," Societies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Puthearath Chan, 2021. "Child-Friendly Urban Development: Smile Village Community Development Initiative in Phnom Penh," World, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-16, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zwiers, Merle & van Ham, Maarten & Manley, David, 2016. "Trajectories of Neighborhood Change: Spatial Patterns of Increasing Ethnic Diversity," IZA Discussion Papers 10216, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Justus Uitermark, 2014. "Integration and Control: The Governing of Urban Marginality in Western Europe," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 1418-1436, July.
    3. K. Landman, 2011. "Urban Fragmentation: Different Views on its Causes and Consequences," Chapters, in: H. S. Geyer (ed.), International Handbook of Urban Policy, Volume 3, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Justus Uitermark & Jan Willem Duyvendak, 2008. "Civilising the City: Populism and Revanchist Urbanism in Rotterdam," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(7), pages 1485-1503, June.
    5. Nele Aernouts & Michael Ryckewaert, 2015. "Reconceptualizing the “Publicness” of Public Housing: The Case of Brussels," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(2), pages 17-30.
    6. Pascal De Decker, 2011. "Understanding Housing Sprawl: The Case of Flanders, Belgium," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(7), pages 1634-1654, July.
    7. Wouter P.C. van Gent & Elmar F. Jansen & Joost H.F. Smits, 2014. "Right-wing Radical Populism in City and Suburbs: An Electoral Geography of the Partij Voor de Vrijheid in the Netherlands," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(9), pages 1775-1794, July.
    8. Rinus Deurloo & Sako Musterd, 2001. "Residential Profiles of Surinamese and Moroccans in Amsterdam," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(3), pages 467-485, March.
    9. Yunlei Qi & Yingling Fan & Tieshan Sun & Lingqian (Ivy) Hu, 2018. "Decade-long changes in spatial mismatch in Beijing, China: Are disadvantaged populations better or worse off?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(4), pages 848-868, June.
    10. Mariko Nakagawa, 2015. "Segregation patterns in cities: ethnic clustering without skill differences," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 55(2), pages 453-483, December.
    11. Jonathan Rokem & Laura Vaughan, 2019. "Geographies of ethnic segregation in Stockholm: The role of mobility and co-presence in shaping the ‘diverse’ city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(12), pages 2426-2446, September.
    12. Maarten Loopmans, 2008. "Relevance, Gentrification and the Development of a New Hegemony on Urban Policies in Antwerp, Belgium," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(12), pages 2499-2519, November.
    13. Sampo Ruoppila, 2005. "Housing Policy and Residential Differentiation in Post-Socialist Tallinn," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 279-300, December.
    14. Filip De Maesschalck, 2011. "The Politicisation of Suburbanisation in Belgium," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(4), pages 699-717, March.
    15. Patrick Ireland, 2008. "Comparing Responses to Ethnic Segregation in Urban Europe," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(7), pages 1333-1358, June.
    16. Kawtar Najib, 2021. "Spaces of Islamophobia and spaces of inequality in Greater Paris," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(3), pages 606-625, May.
    17. Nicolas Van Puymbroeck & Paul Blondeel & Robin Vandevoordt, 2014. "Does Antwerp Belong to Everyone? Unveiling the Conditional Limits to Inclusive Urban Citizenship," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2(3), pages 018-028.
    18. Koopmans, Ruud, 2008. "Tradeoffs between equality and difference: Immigrant integration, multiculturalism, and the welfare state in cross-national perspective," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Migration, Integration, Transnationalization SP IV 2008-701, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    19. Lise Bourdeau-Lepage & Élisabeth Tovar, 2011. "Well-being Disparities Within the Paris Region. A Capabilist Spatialized Outlook," Working Papers hal-04140994, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:32:y:2008:i:3:p:604-616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.