IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v31y2007i4p863-873.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Call if You Have Trouble’: Mobile Phones and Safety among College Students

Author

Listed:
  • JACK NASAR
  • PETER HECHT
  • RICHARD WENER

Abstract

In theory, mobile phone use may have beneficial and harmful effects. Individuals may use mobile phones to call for help or report various dangers and emergencies, but they may also go places they would not normally go without the phone. To test the perceptions of safety and subsequent behavior associated with mobile phone use, we conducted two surveys. One survey of 317 undergraduates at The Ohio State University (OSU) found that most students reported having a mobile phone and feeling that it made them feel safer at night. A follow‐up survey of 305 undergraduates at OSU found that about 40% of students with mobile phones stated that, with a mobile phone, they walked where they normally would not. However, smaller percentages said they used their mobile phones to call for help either in a crime or non‐crime situation or to report an accident, a crime, a reckless driver or a hazardous situation. The results suggest favorable and unfavorable outcomes associated with the mobile phone. Although using it to call for help from a threat, crime, or to report other unsafe conditions has value, the increased perceived safety associated with it may lead students to engage in risky behavior that could increase their chances of becoming a victim. Future work should consider whether mobile phone use increases or decreases the likelihood of victimization and of catching a predator. Résumé En théorie, utiliser un téléphone portable peut avoir des effets positifs et négatifs. Les individus peuvent s'en servir pour appeler de l'aide ou signaler divers dangers et urgences, mais ils peuvent aussi aller là où ils n'iraient pas normalement sans leur portable. Pour tester les sentiments de sécurité et le comportement subséquent associéà l'utilisation du téléphone portable, nous avons réalisé deux études. L'une, sur 317 étudiants de 1er cycle de la Ohio State University (OSU), a montré que la plupart des étudiants disaient disposer d'un portable et avoir la sensation, grâce à lui, d'être plus en sécurité la nuit. D'après une enquête complémentaire sur 305 étudiants de 1er cycle à OSU, environ 40 % des étudiants ayant un portable ont déclaré que, avec celui‐ci, ils se déplaçaient à pied dans des lieux où ils ne le feraient pas normalement. En revanche, une part plus restreinte a indiqué avoir utilisé son portable pour appeler de l'aide, que ce soit lors d'un crime ou non, ou bien pour signaler un accident, un crime, un conducteur imprudent ou une situation dangereuse. Les résultats suggèrent des conséquences favorables et néfastes dérivées du téléphone portable. Bien que son utilisation pour appeler de l'aide en cas de menace ou de crime, ou bien pour signaler d'autres risques, soit valable, la perception de sécurité renforcée qui lui est associée est susceptible d'entraîner les étudiants à avoir un comportement à risque, accroissant leur probabilité de devenir une victime. Un travail ultérieur devrait étudier si l'usage du téléphone portable accroît ou diminue la probabilité de victimisation et de capture d'un délinquant.

Suggested Citation

  • Jack Nasar & Peter Hecht & Richard Wener, 2007. "‘Call if You Have Trouble’: Mobile Phones and Safety among College Students," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 863-873, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:31:y:2007:i:4:p:863-873
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00759.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00759.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00759.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rice, Ronald E. & Katz, James E., 0. "Comparing internet and mobile phone usage: digital divides of usage, adoption, and dropouts," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(8-9), pages 597-623, September.
    2. Schafer, Joseph A. & Huebner, Beth M. & Bynum, Timothy S., 2006. "Fear of crime and criminal victimization: Gender-based contrasts," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 285-301.
    3. Rachel Pain & Sue Grundy & Sally Gill & Elizabeth Towner & Geoff Sparks & Kate Hughes, 2005. "‘So Long as I Take my Mobile’: Mobile Phones, Urban Life and Geographies of Young People's Safety," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 814-830, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dal Fiore, Filippo & Mokhtarian, Patricia L. & Salomon, Ilan & Singer, Matan E., 2014. "“Nomads at last”? A set of perspectives on how mobile technology may affect travel," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 97-106.
    2. Chowdhury, Subeh & van Wee, Bert, 2020. "Examining women's perception of safety during waiting times at public transport terminals," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 102-108.
    3. Chen, Jingjing, 2021. "Do mobile phones empower women? A perspective from rural India," Warwick-Monash Economics Student Papers 09, Warwick Monash Economics Student Papers.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jae Seung Lee & Sungjin Park & Sanghoon Jung, 2016. "Effect of Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) Measures on Active Living and Fear of Crime," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Fortunati, Leopoldina & Taipale, Sakari, 2012. "Organization of the social sphere and typology of the residential setting: How the adoption of the mobile phone affects sociability in rural and urban locations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 33-43.
    3. Brenda Mak & Paul Beckman & Nicole Bohn, 2016. "Perceived Usefulness and Satisfaction of Mobile Phone for Users with Disabilities," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(02), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Su Jin Kang & Wonseok Seo, 2020. "The Effects of Multilayered Disorder Characteristics on Fear of Crime in Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Ishfaq Ahmed & Khadija Aijaz Perji, 2011. "Mobile Phone to Youngsters: Necessity or Addiction," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 2(5), pages 229-238.
    6. Kuen, Kiseong & Weisburd, David & White, Clair & Hinkle, Joshua C., 2022. "Examining impacts of street characteristics on residents' fear of crime: Evidence from a longitudinal study of crime hot spots," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    7. Suárez, David & García-Mariñoso, Begoña, 2013. "Which are the drivers of fixed to mobile telephone access substitution? An empirical study of the Spanish residential market," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 282-291.
    8. Sanghyun Kim & Hyunsun Park, 2018. "Do Female Employees at Small and Medium Enterprises Perceive Open Source Software Usefulness and Satisfaction Differently from Male Employees? A Survey Analysis," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-17, September.
    9. Luis Hernando Gutierrez & Luis Fernando Gamboa, 2008. "An approximation to the digital divide among low income people in Colombia, Mexico and Perú: two composite indexes," Documentos de Trabajo 4710, Universidad del Rosario.
    10. Penard, Thierry & Poussing, Nicolas & Mukoko, Blaise & Tamokwe Piaptie, Georges Bertrand, 2015. "Internet adoption and usage patterns in Africa: Evidence from Cameroon," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 71-80.
    11. Marios A. Pappas & Eleftheria Demertzi & Yannis Papagerasimou & Lefteris Koukianakis & Nikitas Voukelatos & Athanasios Drigas, 2019. "Cognitive-Based E-Learning Design for Older Adults," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-18, January.
    12. Andrés Ramírez-Hassan, 2020. "Dynamic variable selection in dynamic logistic regression: an application to Internet subscription," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 909-932, August.
    13. Sayyid Ali Banihashemi & Zahra Rejaei, 2015. "Analysis of the Digital Divide in Asia-Islamic Countries: A TOPSIS Approach," Journal of Asian Scientific Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(4), pages 165-176, April.
    14. Chris Gilleard & Ian Jones & Paul Higgs, 2015. "Connectivity in Later Life: The Declining Age Divide in Mobile Cell Phone Ownership," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 20(2), pages 1-13, May.
    15. Rader, Nicole E. & Cossman, Jeralynn S. & Porter, Jeremy R., 2012. "Fear of crime and vulnerability: Using a national sample of Americans to examine two competing paradigms," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 134-141.
    16. Balmori de la Miyar Jose Roberto, 2019. "Violence and Avoidance Behavior: The Case of the Mexican Drug War," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 25(4), pages 1-7, December.
    17. Joerg Koenigstorfer & Andrea Groeppel-Klein, 2012. "Consumer acceptance of the mobile Internet," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 917-928, December.
    18. Vilalta Perdomo, Carlos J., 2013. "Determinant Factors in the Perception of Crime-Related Insecurity in Mexico," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 4237, Inter-American Development Bank.
    19. Thierry PENARD & Nicolas POUSSING & Gabriel ZOMO YEBE & Philémon NSI ELLA, 2012. "Comparing the Determinants of Internet and Cell Phone Use in Africa: Evidence from Gabon," Communications & Strategies, IDATE, Com&Strat dept., vol. 1(86), pages 65-83, 2nd quart.
    20. Browning, Christopher R. & Cagney, Kathleen A. & Iveniuk, James, 2012. "Neighborhood stressors and cardiovascular health: Crime and C-reactive protein in Dallas, USA," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(7), pages 1271-1279.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:31:y:2007:i:4:p:863-873. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.