IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/growch/v52y2021i4p2318-2341.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond technological relatedness: An evolutionary pro‐growth coalition and industrial transformation in Kunshan, China

Author

Listed:
  • Cassandra C. Wang
  • Gary Gereffi
  • Zhigao Liu

Abstract

The article develops an analytical framework for an adaptable and evolutionary pro‐growth coalition led by local government to understand regional industrial transformation in developing China. Taking Kunshan as an example, we argue that evolutionary and adaptable coalitions were key to Kunshan's successful transformation from an agriculture county to an export‐oriented industrial center, and to a more diversified city. The coalition of the local state with land‐holding farmers, domestic and international firms, and the central government during the 1980s‐1990s laid a foundation for industrial transformation; the strong coalition of local state and Taiwanese investors in the 1990s‐2000s shaped its new industry of IT manufacturing; and the coalition of local state with multiple actors at various geographical scales contributed a more diversified and innovative industrial structure of Kunshan. This study highlights that industrial evolution is not only driven by technological relatedness but also by the evolutionary state‐led coalition of multiple actors from different levels and at different stages, and appeals for a political economy perspective to understand industrial transformation of resource‐ scarce regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Cassandra C. Wang & Gary Gereffi & Zhigao Liu, 2021. "Beyond technological relatedness: An evolutionary pro‐growth coalition and industrial transformation in Kunshan, China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 2318-2341, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:growch:v:52:y:2021:i:4:p:2318-2341
    DOI: 10.1111/grow.12566
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12566
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/grow.12566?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frank Neffke & Martin Henning & Ron Boschma, 2011. "How Do Regions Diversify over Time? Industry Relatedness and the Development of New Growth Paths in Regions," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 87(3), pages 237-265, July.
    2. Stuart Dawley & Danny MacKinnon & Robert Pollock, 2019. "Creating strategic couplings in global production networks: regional institutions and lead firm investment in the Humber region, UK," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(4), pages 853-872.
    3. Gary Gereffi, 2019. "Economic upgrading in global value chains," Chapters, in: Stefano Ponte & Gary Gereffi & Gale Raj-Reichert (ed.), Handbook on Global Value Chains, chapter 14, pages 240-254, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Canfei He & Yan Yan & David Rigby, 2018. "Regional industrial evolution in China," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 97(2), pages 173-198, June.
    5. Nicholas A. Phelps & Andrew Wood, 2006. "Lost in translation? Local interests, global actors and inward investment regimes," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(4), pages 493-515, August.
    6. Xiaohui Hu & Robert Hassink, 2017. "Place leadership with Chinese characteristics? A case study of the Zaozhuang coal-mining region in transition," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(2), pages 224-234, February.
    7. Shengjun Zhu & Canfei He & Yi Zhou, 2017. "How to jump further and catch up? Path-breaking in an uneven industry space," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 17(3), pages 521-545.
    8. Shengjun Zhu & Zhenfa Li & Canfei He, 2019. "Who leads regional industrial dynamics? “New industry creators” in Chinese regions," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 69-89, March.
    9. Ron Martin & Peter Sunley, 2006. "Path dependence and regional economic evolution," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(4), pages 395-437, August.
    10. Inzelt, Annamaria, 2004. "The evolution of university-industry-government relationships during transition," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6-7), pages 975-995, September.
    11. Robert Hassink & Xiaohui Hu, 2017. "From Coal Mining to Coal Chemicals? Unpacking New Path Creation in an Old Industrial Region of Transitional China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(2), pages 233-245, June.
    12. Robert Hassink & Claudia Klaerding & Pedro Marques, 2014. "Advancing Evolutionary Economic Geography by Engaged Pluralism," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(7), pages 1295-1307, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ron Boschma, 2021. "Global Value Chains from an Evolutionary Economic Geography perspective: a research agenda," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2134, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Nov 2021.
    2. Ron Boschma, 2021. "Designing Smart Specialization Policy: relatedness, unrelatedness, or what?," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2128, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Sep 2021.
    3. Zehong Wang & Shaojian Wang & Jieyu Wang & Yuqu Wang, 2022. "Development zones and urban economic performance in China: Direct impact and channel effects," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(4), pages 1762-1782, December.
    4. Eum, Wonsub & Lee, Jeong-Dong, 2022. "The co-evolution of production and technological capabilities during industrial development," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 454-469.
    5. Jeroen Content & Nicola Cortinovis & Koen Frenken & Jacob Jordaan, 2022. "The roles of KIBS and R&D in the industrial diversification of regions," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 68(1), pages 29-64, February.
    6. Kroll Henning & Neuhäusler Peter, 2020. "Recent Trends of Regional Development in China – Technological Portfolios and Economic Growth," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 64(1), pages 14-27, March.
    7. Yang Li & Frank Neffke, 2022. "Relatedness in regional development: in search of the right specification," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2208, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Apr 2022.
    8. Ron Boschma, 2022. "Evolutionary Economic Geography and Policy," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2220, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Oct 2022.
    9. Tengfei Wang & Henrik Halkier & Laura James & Renxu Gu & Cheng Chi, 2022. "External Knowledge Linkages and the Evolution of Comparative Advantage: An Examination of Territorial Knowledge Dynamics in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-14, April.
    10. Andrea Simone, 2023. "What Drives Technological Change in Regions? Relatedness and R&D Subsidies in the US from 1981 to 2010," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 114(2), pages 133-156, April.
    11. Yibo Qiao & Nicola Cortinovis & Andrea Morrison, 2024. "MNE Spillovers and Local Export Dynamics in China: The Role of Relatedness and Forward-Backward Linkages," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2415, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised May 2024.
    12. Danny Mackinnon & Stuart Dawley & Andy Pike & Andrew Cumbers, 2018. "Rethinking Path Creation: A Geographical Political Economy Approach," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1825, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jun 2018.
    13. Wonsub Eum & Jeong‐Dong Lee, 2022. "Alternative paths of diversification for developing countries," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 2336-2355, November.
    14. Zhengyuan Zhao & Zhigao Liu, 2021. "Development Path of Industrial Heritage Tourism: A Case Study of Kitakyushu (Japan)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Andy Pike & Andrew Cumbers & Stuart Dawley & Danny MacKinnon & Robert McMaster, 2015. "Doing evolution in economic geography," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1532, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Sep 2015.
    16. Moritz Breul & Miguel Atienza, 2022. "Extractive Industries and Regional Diversification: A Multidimensional Framework for Diversification in Mining Regions," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2213, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jul 2022.
    17. Pierre-Alex Balland & Ron Boschma, 2024. "An Evolutionary Approach to Regional Development Traps in European Regions," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2420, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jul 2024.
    18. Martin Ron & Sunley Peter, 2022. "Making history matter more in evolutionary economic geography," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 66(2), pages 65-80, July.
    19. Ron Boschma & Koen Frenken, 2015. "Evolutionary Economic Geography," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1518, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised May 2015.
    20. Li, Yang & Neffke, Frank M.H., 2024. "Evaluating the principle of relatedness: Estimation, drivers and implications for policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:growch:v:52:y:2021:i:4:p:2318-2341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0017-4815 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.