IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/growch/v33y2002i1p133-151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Returning and New Montana Migrants: Socio‐economic and Motivational Differences

Author

Listed:
  • Christiane von Reichert

Abstract

This paper examines return migrants and new migrants to Montana: Who are they? Why do they move? Do return migrants move for different reasons than new migrants? Data from the 1994–1997 Montana Poll, a representative survey of Montana households, are used. A comparison of socio‐economic differences of return and new migrants shows that the two migrant types are very similar in terms of education, income, and age. This stands in contrast to the findings of others who maintain that return migrants are negatively selected with respect to education. Logistic regressions were employed to identify the effect of age and place ties on reasons for moving. Return migrants and new migrants move to Montana for very similar reasons, with family being the most important primary reason for moving. Moving for lifestyle reasons, such as environmental quality and urban amenities, were found to systematically change with age. This could explain why people return to a place they left earlier in life. While other research on return migration compared return migrants and other migrants who left the same place of origin, this paper offers a comparison of return migrants and other migrants who seek out the same destination. Results from the Montana Poll suggest that the same destination attracts return migrants and new migrants with similar socio‐economic characteristics who move there for very similar reasons.

Suggested Citation

  • Christiane von Reichert, 2002. "Returning and New Montana Migrants: Socio‐economic and Motivational Differences," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 133-151.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:growch:v:33:y:2002:i:1:p:133-151
    DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00283.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00283.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00283.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kevin J. A. Thomas & Christopher Inkpen, 2013. "Migration Dynamics, Entrepreneurship, and African Development: Lessons from Malawi," International Migration Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(4), pages 844-873, December.
    2. Cromartie, John & von Reichert, Christiane & Arthun, Ryan, 2015. "Factors Affecting Former Residents' Returning to Rural Communities," Economic Research Report 206008, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Kara Ross Camarena & Nils Hägerdal, 2020. "When Do Displaced Persons Return? Postwar Migration among Christians in Mount Lebanon," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(2), pages 223-239, April.
    4. Julie L. Hotchkiss & Anil Rupasingha, 2021. "Individual social capital and migration," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 808-837, June.
    5. Beth Wilson & E. Helen Berry & Michael Toney & Young-Taek Kim & John Cromartie, 2009. "A Panel Based Analysis of the Effects of Race/Ethnicity and Other Individual Level Characteristics at Leaving on Returning," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 28(4), pages 405-428, August.
    6. Li Yu & Georgeanne M. Artz, 2019. "Does rural entrepreneurship pay?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 647-668, October.
    7. Georgeanne Artz & Li Yu, 2011. "How ya Gonna Keep ’em Down on the Farm," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 25(4), pages 341-352, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:growch:v:33:y:2002:i:1:p:133-151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0017-4815 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.