IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v28y2021is1p113-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Care and community revalued during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A feminist couple perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Swati Vohra
  • Mandeep Taneja

Abstract

The COVID‐19 pandemic led us to understand and revalue care ethics within our daily lives and communities based on the feminist theory of care ethics. This article is a personal reflection of an academic couple living in Japan as we reflect on our experiences and the challenges encountered in caring for ourselves and our community. We discuss the ideas of care theory mainly: caring‐about and caring‐for, interchangeably in our discussion across the three‐stage categories: Home — A Commonplace; Care Ethics in Community; and Care Ethics for Self. Through these personal narratives, we strive to recognize the struggles of living through the pandemic in a virtually connected world that often disconnects us from self. We foster the idea of embracing care ethics as a starting point at an individual level.

Suggested Citation

  • Swati Vohra & Mandeep Taneja, 2021. "Care and community revalued during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A feminist couple perspective," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(S1), pages 113-121, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:28:y:2021:i:s1:p:113-121
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12507
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12507
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.12507?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grace Gao & Linna Sai, 2020. "Towards a ‘virtual’ world: Social isolation and struggles during the COVID‐19 pandemic as single women living alone," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(5), pages 754-762, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amy Kipp & Roberta Hawkins, 2022. "From the nice work to the hard work: “Troubling” community‐based CareMongering during the COVID‐19 pandemic," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 1293-1313, July.
    2. Liela A. Jamjoom, 2022. "Tread lightly: Liminality and Covid‐19 reflections," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 1314-1330, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefanie Stantcheva, 2022. "Inequalities in the times of a pandemic," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 37(109), pages 5-41.
    2. Omar Mazzucchelli & Claudia Manzi & Cristina Rossi Lamastra, 2022. "Women’s Working Conditions during COVID-19: A Review of the Literature and a Research Agenda," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Julia Coffey & Julia Cook & David Farrugia & Steven Threadgold & Penny Jane Burke, 2021. "Intersecting marginalities: International students' struggles for “survival” in COVID‐19," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 1337-1351, July.
    4. Elena P. Antonacopoulou & Andri Georgiadou, 2021. "Leading through social distancing: The future of work, corporations and leadership from home," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 749-767, March.
    5. Aleem, Majid & Sufyan, Muhammad & Ameer, Irfan & Mustak, Mekhail, 2023. "Remote work and the COVID-19 pandemic: An artificial intelligence-based topic modeling and a future agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    6. Emmanouela Mandalaki & Ely Daou, 2021. "(Dis)embodied encounters between art and academic writing amid a pandemic," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(S1), pages 227-242, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:28:y:2021:i:s1:p:113-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.