IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v28y2021i1p231-247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Munchetty controversy: Empire, race, and the BBC

Author

Listed:
  • Yasmin Ibrahim
  • Anita Howarth

Abstract

In September 2019, Naga Munchetty, a BBC presenter, was charged by the corporation as having breached its guidelines in sharing her personal experience of racism in reaction to Donald Trump's “Go Back” outburst at four female political opponents, an incident understood worldwide as a racist attack. The BBC, acting on complaints from some viewers, upheld that Munchetty had partially breached its journalistic guidelines in speaking about her experience of racism. This article, through a postcolonial critique of the incident, argues that the BBC guidelines and the censure of Munchetty have to be viewed through an organizational “dual consciousness” of the libidinal economy of the BBC as part of the British Empire and being an active broker of race relations in Britain through the national broadcasting space as a public service broadcaster. The BBC, both as an organization and a broadcaster, is inscribed through its historicity and a long trajectory of “fixing” the identity of the racial “Other.” In the Munchetty controversy, her racial subjectivity is made “uncanny” or alien to the racialized subject through the BBC's organizational ethos of “objectivity and impartiality” to reassemble race as fiction within its “regime of representation.”

Suggested Citation

  • Yasmin Ibrahim & Anita Howarth, 2021. "The Munchetty controversy: Empire, race, and the BBC," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 231-247, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:28:y:2021:i:1:p:231-247
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12543
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12543
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.12543?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anonymous, 2018. "Letter from the Editor," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(3), pages 447-448, September.
    2. Dennis Kwek, 2003. "Decolonizing and Re-Presenting Culture’s Consequences: A Postcolonial Critique of Cross-Cultural Studies in Management1," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Anshuman Prasad (ed.), Postcolonial Theory and Organizational Analysis: A Critical Engagement, chapter 0, pages 121-146, Palgrave Macmillan.
    3. Anonymous, 2018. "Letter from the Editor," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(4), pages 649-650, December.
    4. Anonymous, 2018. "Letter from the Editor," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(1), pages 1-3, March.
    5. Anonymous, 2018. "Letter from the Editor," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(2), pages 245-247, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Beata M. Kowalczyk, 2023. "“…in Japan, we are just imitating the ‘real’ thing…”. (Re)doing racialized authentic self in classical music," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1468-1483, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beck, Susanne & Prügl, Reinhard & Walter, Katharina, 2020. "Communicating the family firm brand: Antecedents and performance effects," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 95-107.
    2. David J. G. Slusky & Donna K. Ginther, 2021. "Did Medicaid expansion reduce medical divorce?," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1139-1174, December.
    3. Poulis, Konstantinos & Kastanakis, Minas, 2020. "On theorizing and methodological fetishism," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 676-683.
    4. Christofer Herlin & Per Kjaer & Ansgar Espeland & Jan Sture Skouen & Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde & Jaro Karppinen & Jaakko Niinimäki & Joan Solgaard Sørensen & Kjersti Storheim & Tue Secher Jensen, 2018. "Modic changes—Their associations with low back pain and activity limitation: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-27, August.
    5. Wilson, J. Holton & Dingus, Rebecca & Hoyle, Jeffrey, 2020. "Women count: Perceptions of forecasting in sales," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(5), pages 637-646.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:28:y:2021:i:1:p:231-247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.