IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/finmgt/v50y2021i3p805-843.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why do takeover targets protect acquirers? Evidence from force‐the‐vote provisions

Author

Listed:
  • Sridhar Gogineni
  • John Puthenpurackal

Abstract

We conduct the first comprehensive study of force‐the‐vote (FTV) provisions in mergers and acquisitions transactions and test competing agency and efficient contracting explanations for their usage. Target FTV provisions are observed more frequently when bidding is costly and are associated with higher target returns, a lower likelihood of competing bids, and a higher likelihood of deal completion. By providing greater deal protection to acquirers, target FTV provisions appear to improve bidding incentives resulting in higher target returns consistent with efficient contracting. Our results are robust to controlling for other merger provisions, such as termination fee provisions, stock voting agreements, and endogeneity concerns.

Suggested Citation

  • Sridhar Gogineni & John Puthenpurackal, 2021. "Why do takeover targets protect acquirers? Evidence from force‐the‐vote provisions," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 50(3), pages 805-843, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:finmgt:v:50:y:2021:i:3:p:805-843
    DOI: 10.1111/fima.12312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/fima.12312
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/fima.12312?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kai Li & Tingting Liu & Juan (Julie) Wu, 2018. "Vote Avoidance and Shareholder Voting in Mergers and Acquisitions," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 31(8), pages 3176-3211.
    2. Nihat Aktas & Eric de Bodt & Richard Roll, 2010. "Negotiations under the threat of an auction," Post-Print hal-02312521, HAL.
    3. Stulz, Rene M & Walkling, Ralph A & Song, Moon H, 1990. "The Distribution of Target Ownership and the Division of Gains in Successful Takeovers," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 45(3), pages 817-833, July.
    4. Ahern, Kenneth R., 2012. "Bargaining power and industry dependence in mergers," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(3), pages 530-550.
    5. Fama, Eugene F. & French, Kenneth R., 1997. "Industry costs of equity," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 153-193, February.
    6. Aktas, Nihat & de Bodt, Eric & Roll, Richard, 2010. "Negotiations under the threat of an auction," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 241-255, November.
    7. Micah S. Officer, 2006. "The Market Pricing of Implicit Options in Merger Collars," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 79(1), pages 115-136, January.
    8. Kisgen, Darren J. & QJ Qian, Jun & Song, Weihong, 2009. "Are fairness opinions fair? The case of mergers and acquisitions," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 179-207, February.
    9. Marco Becht & Andrea Polo & Stefano Rossi, 2016. "Does Mandatory Shareholder Voting Prevent Bad Acquisitions?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 29(11), pages 3035-3067.
    10. Jay C. Hartzell, 2004. "What's In It for Me? CEOs Whose Firms Are Acquired," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 17(1), pages 37-61.
    11. Bargeron, Leonce L. & Schlingemann, Frederik P. & Stulz, René M. & Zutter, Chad J., 2008. "Why do private acquirers pay so little compared to public acquirers?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(3), pages 375-390, September.
    12. Audra L. Boone & J. Harold Mulherin, 2007. "Do Termination Provisions Truncate the Takeover Bidding Process?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 20(2), pages 461-489.
    13. Jeon, Jin Q. & Ligon, James A., 2011. "How much is reasonable? The size of termination fees in mergers and acquisitions," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 959-981, September.
    14. Boone, Audra L. & Mulherin, J. Harold, 2017. "Who monitors the monitor? The use of special committees by target firms in corporate takeovers," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 388-404.
    15. Vineet Bhagwat & Robert Dam & Jarrad Harford, 2016. "The Real Effects of Uncertainty on Merger Activity," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 29(11), pages 3000-3034.
    16. Julie Wulf, 2004. "Do CEOs in Mergers Trade Power for Premium? Evidence from "Mergers of Equals"," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 60-101, April.
    17. Denis, David J. & Macias, Antonio J., 2013. "Material Adverse Change Clauses and Acquisition Dynamics," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 48(3), pages 819-847, June.
    18. repec:bla:jfinan:v:59:y:2004:i:6:p:2719-2743 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Offenberg, David & Pirinsky, Christo, 2015. "How do acquirers choose between mergers and tender offers?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 331-348.
    20. Fich, Eliezer M. & Harford, Jarrad & Tran, Anh L., 2015. "Motivated monitors: The importance of institutional investors׳ portfolio weights," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 21-48.
    21. Fich, Eliezer M. & Cai, Jie & Tran, Anh L., 2011. "Stock option grants to target CEOs during private merger negotiations," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 413-430, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fich, Eliezer M. & Harford, Jarrad & Tran, Anh L., 2015. "Motivated monitors: The importance of institutional investors׳ portfolio weights," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 21-48.
    2. Hong Zhu & Qi Zhu, 2016. "Mergers and acquisitions by Chinese firms: A review and comparison with other mergers and acquisitions research in the leading journals," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 1107-1149, December.
    3. Boone, Audra & Broughman, Brian & Macias, Antonio J., 2018. "Shareholder approval thresholds in acquisitions: Evidence from tender offers," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 225-245.
    4. Demirtaş, Gül, 2017. "Board involvement in the M&A negotiation process," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 27-43.
    5. Fich, Eliezer M. & Cai, Jie & Tran, Anh L., 2011. "Stock option grants to target CEOs during private merger negotiations," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 413-430, August.
    6. Shaojie Lai & Xiaoling Pu & Qing (Sophie) Wang & Jianing Zhang, 2023. "Reference prices and withdrawn acquisitions," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 4365-4384, October.
    7. Aktas, Nihat & Xu, Guosong & Yurtoglu, Burcin, 2018. "She is mine: Determinants and value effects of early announcements in takeovers," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 180-202.
    8. Eckbo, B. Espen, 2009. "Bidding strategies and takeover premiums: A review," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 149-178, February.
    9. Marco Testoni & Mariko Sakakibara & M. Keith Chen, 2022. "Face‐to‐face interactions and the returns to acquisitions: Evidence from smartphone geolocational data," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(13), pages 2669-2702, December.
    10. Fich, Eliezer M. & Nguyen, Tu, 2020. "The value of CEOs' supply chain experience: Evidence from mergers and acquisitions," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    11. Dirk Jenter & Katharina Lewellen, 2015. "CEO Preferences and Acquisitions," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 70(6), pages 2813-2852, December.
    12. Erin Oldford & Isaac Otchere, 2021. "Institutional cross-ownership, heterogeneous incentives, and negative premium mergers," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 321-351, July.
    13. Weitzel, Utz & Kling, Gerhard, 2012. "Sold below value? Why some targets accept very low and even negative takeover premiums," MPRA Paper 42832, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Bargeron, Leonce L. & Schlingemann, Frederik P. & Stulz, René M. & Zutter, Chad J., 2017. "What is the shareholder wealth impact of target CEO retention in private equity deals?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 186-206.
    15. Adra, Samer & Barbopoulos, Leonidas G. & Saunders, Anthony, 2020. "The impact of monetary policy on M&A outcomes," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    16. Bonaime, Alice & Gulen, Huseyin & Ion, Mihai, 2018. "Does policy uncertainty affect mergers and acquisitions?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(3), pages 531-558.
    17. Eaton, Gregory W. & Guo, Feng & Liu, Tingting & Officer, Micah S., 2022. "Peer selection and valuation in mergers and acquisitions," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 230-255.
    18. Liu, Tingting & Wu, Juan (Julie), 2014. "Merger arbitrage short selling and price pressure," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 36-54.
    19. Offenberg, David & Pirinsky, Christo, 2015. "How do acquirers choose between mergers and tender offers?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 331-348.
    20. Bessler, Wolfgang & Schneck, Colin & Zimmermann, Jan, 2015. "Bidder contests in international mergers and acquisitions: The impact of toeholds, preemptive bidding, and termination fees," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 4-23.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:finmgt:v:50:y:2021:i:3:p:805-843. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.