IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/eurcho/v6y2007i1p22-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Economics of Rising Fuel Costs and European Fisheries Les pêcheries européennes confrontées à la croissance du coût des carburants Die ökonomischen Aspekte steigender Mineralölkosten und europäischer Fischerei

Author

Listed:
  • Ragnar Arnason

Abstract

The Economics of European Fisheries The huge increase in fuel prices — about doubling since 2004 — represents a major economic shock to European fishing fleets. Before this latest price hike, fuel accounted for 15 per cent of the operating costs of most fleet segments. Thus, in spite of various fuel saving measures, this fuel price increase has probably reduced the profitability of European fishing fleets by well over 5 per cent of revenues on average. What is perhaps less obvious is that the fuel price increase also serves to bring the industry more into line with the biological productivity of the fish stocks. Many European fisheries today are characterized by excessive fishing fleets and severely overexploited fish stocks. It is shown in this article that lower profitability in fishing serves to reduce this excessive fishing pressure leading to some fish stock recovery and the possibility of higher sustainable catches. Thus, as painful as it is to the fishing industry, this fuel price increase may actually contribute to a healthier fishery in the longer run, and by increasing sustainable catches also benefit consumers of fish. These benefits, however, will not materialize if the impact of the fuel price increase is neutralized by inadvisable financial subsidies to the fishing industry La très forte croissance des coûts des carburants (il a sensiblement doublés depuis 2004) constitue pour la flotte de pêche européenne un choc majeur. Avant ce pic des prix, les carburants représentaient environ 15% des coûts de la plupart des unités. De ce fait, même en tenant compte des mesures prises pour diminuer la consommation, cet accroissement du prix des carburants a conduit à une diminution de la profitabilité des flottes de pêche qui atteint en moyenne une valeur largement supérieure à 5% des recettes. Ce qui est peut être moins évident, c'est que cet accroissement du prix des carburant a aussi pour conséquence de replacer l'ensemble de l'industrie dans une situation plus proche de la productivité biologique naturelle du stock de poissons. Beaucoup de pêcheries européennes aujourd'hui sont caractérisées par des flottes trop importantes et une forte surexploitation du stock. Cet article montre que la baisse de profi tabilité de la pêche devrait entraîner une réduction de la pression excessive sur les stocks de poissons, permettant dans certain cas leur reconstitution, et la promesse de prises plus abondantes dans l'avenir. Par conséquent, si pénible que soit cet accroissement du prix des carburants pour l'industrie de la pêche, il devrait à long terme contribuer à une meilleure santé des pêcheries, en même temps que, en garantissant la durabilité des prises, à améliorer la situation des consommateurs de poisson. Ces bénéfi ces, toutefois, ne se concrétiseront pas si l'effet de l'accroissement du prix des carburants est contrebalancé par l'attribution maladroite de subventions aux pêcheries. Der enorme Anstieg der Mineralölpreise, die sich seit 2004 nahezu verdoppelt haben, stellt in wirtschaftlicher Hinsicht einen schweren Schlag für die europäischen Fangfl otten dar. Vor dem jüngsten Preisanstieg machten die Mineralölkosten in den meisten Flottensegmenten 15 Prozent der Betriebskosten aus. Trotz verschiedener Maßnahmen zur Verringerung des Mineralölverbrauchs hat dieser Anstieg der Mineralölpreise demnach wahrscheinlich die Rentabilität der europäischen Fangfl otten im Durchschnitt um deutlich mehr als fünf Prozent der Erlöse gesenkt. Es ist möglicherweise weniger offensichtlich, dass der Anstieg der Mineralölpreise ebenfalls dazu führt, dass sich die Industrie mehr an die biologische Produktivität der Fischbestände anpasst. Viele Bereiche der europäischen Fischerei zeichnen sich heute durch übermäßig große Fangfl otten und starke Überfischung aus. In diesem Beitrag wird aufgezeigt, dass eine geringere Rentabilität in der Fischerei dazu beiträgt, den Druck für die übermäßige Fischerei zu senken; dadurch könnten sich die Fischbestände erholen und es wären nachhaltig höhere Fangmengen möglich. So schmerzhaft es für die Fischindustrie auch sein mag: Der Anstieg des Mineralölpreises könnte daher tatsächlich auf lange Sicht zu einer florierenden Fischerei beitragen, und von nachhaltig höheren Fangmengen könnten ebenfalls die Verbraucher profitieren. Dazu wird es jedoch nicht kommen, wenn die Auswirkungen des Anstiegs des Mineralölpreises durch die nicht zu empfehlende finanzielle Unterstützung der Fischindustrie kompensiert werden.

Suggested Citation

  • Ragnar Arnason, 2007. "The Economics of Rising Fuel Costs and European Fisheries Les pêcheries européennes confrontées à la croissance du coût des carburants Die ökonomischen Aspekte steigender Mineralölkosten und europäisc," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 6(1), pages 22-29, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:6:y:2007:i:1:p:22-29
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-692X.2007.00048.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-692X.2007.00048.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1746-692X.2007.00048.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H. Scott Gordon, 1954. "The Economic Theory of a Common-Property Resource: The Fishery," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Chennat Gopalakrishnan (ed.), Classic Papers in Natural Resource Economics, chapter 9, pages 178-203, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. H. Scott Gordon, 1954. "The Economic Theory of a Common-Property Resource: The Fishery," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 62(2), pages 124-124.
    3. Milazzo, M., 1998. "Subsidies in World Fisheries. A Reexamination," Papers 406, World Bank - Technical Papers.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arnason, Ragnar, 2009. "Fisheries management and operations research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(3), pages 741-751, March.
    2. Duy, Nguyen Ngoc & Flaaten, Ola & Long, Le Kim, 2015. "Government support and profitability effects – Vietnamese offshore fisheries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 77-86.
    3. Sabau, Gabriela & Boksh, F.I.M. Muktadir, 2017. "Fish Trade Liberalization Under 21st Century Trade Agreements: The CETA and Newfoundland and Labrador Fish and Seafood Industry," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 222-233.
    4. Asche, Frank & Smith, Martin D., 2010. "Trade and fisheries: Key issues for the World Trade Organization," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2010-03, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    5. Kotchen, Matthew J. & Salant, Stephen W., 2011. "A free lunch in the commons," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 61(3), pages 245-253, May.
    6. Holland, Daniel S. & Herrera, Guillermo E., 2012. "The impact of age structure, uncertainty, and asymmetric spatial dynamics on regulatory performance in a fishery metapopulation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 207-218.
    7. McCloskey Deirdre Nansen, 2018. "The Two Movements in Economic Thought, 1700–2000: Empty Economic Boxes Revisited," Man and the Economy, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Carlson, Ernest W., 1971. "The Biological and Economic Objectives of Fishery Management," File Manuscripts, United States National Marine Fisheries Service, Economic Research Division, number 233587, January.
    9. Coxhead, Ian A. & Jayasuriya, Sisira, 2003. "Trade, Liberalization, Resource Degradation and Industrial Pollution in Developing Countries: An Integrated Analysis," Staff Papers 12691, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    10. Busch, Jonah, 2008. "Gains from configuration: The transboundary protected area as a conservation tool," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 394-404, October.
    11. Rauscher, Michael, 1996. "Sustainable Development and Complex Ecosystems. An Economist's View," Thuenen-Series of Applied Economic Theory 02, University of Rostock, Institute of Economics.
    12. Squires, Dale & Vestergaard, Niels, 2013. "Technical change in fisheries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 286-292.
    13. Guillaume Bataille & Benteng Zou, 2024. "International Fisheries Agreements: Endogenous Exits, Shapley Values, and Moratorium Fishing Policy," DEM Discussion Paper Series 24-06, Department of Economics at the University of Luxembourg.
    14. De Alessi, Michael & Sullivan, Joseph M. & Hilborn, Ray, 2014. "The legal, regulatory, and institutional evolution of fishing cooperatives in Alaska and the West Coast of the United States," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 217-225.
    15. B. Rudders, David & Ward, John M., 2015. "Own-price elasticity of open access supply as a long-run measure of fish stock abundance," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 215-226.
    16. Barkley Rosser, J. Jr., 2001. "Complex ecologic-economic dynamics and environmental policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 23-37, April.
    17. Zhang, Yue & Zheng, Yan & Liu, Xi & Zhang, Qingling & Li, Aihua, 2016. "Dynamical analysis of a differential algebraic bio-economic model with stage-structured and stochastic fluctuations," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 462(C), pages 222-229.
    18. Bell, Frederick W. & Nash, Darrel A. & Carlson, Ernest W. & Waugh, Frederick V. & Kinoshita, Richard K. & Fullenbaum, Richard F., 1970. "The Future of the World's Fishery Resources: Forecasts of Demand, Supply and Prices to the Year 2000 with a Discussion of Implications for Public Policy," File Manuscripts, United States National Marine Fisheries Service, Economic Research Division, number 233219, January.
    19. Jorge Higinio Maldonado & Rocío del Pilar Moreno-Sanchez, 2016. "Exacerbating the Tragedy of the Commons: Private Inefficient Outcomes and Peer Effect in Experimental Games with Fishing Communities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, February.
    20. Strydom, M.B. & Nieuwoudt, W. Lieb, 1998. "An Economic Analysis Of Restructuring The South African Hake Quota Market," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 37(3), pages 1-15, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:6:y:2007:i:1:p:22-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.