IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/eurcho/v17y2018i1p28-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Microdata: a critical source for policy evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Krijn Poppe
  • Hans Vrolijk

Abstract

The FLINT project (Farm Level Indicators for New Topics in policy evaluation) was aimed at testing the feasibility of collecting data on the sustainability performance of farms through the European Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN). The project defined a list of sustainability themes based on an assessment of policy needs, the existing literature and a review of national initiatives to measure sustainability. Data were collected in nine Member States (Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, the Netherlands, Poland and Spain) from 1,100 farms of different types. Although some problems were encountered, mainly due to the initial pilot project character of FLINT, we conclude that data collection is feasible, whatever the way a Member State has organised its data collection for FADN. The FLINT project has investigated options for upscaling the results from 9 to 28 Member States to create a representative panel with farm†level sustainability data. This leads to the conclusion that the most attractive option is to reduce the current FADN sample in order to provide the sustainability data that are urgently needed for improved policy evaluation. This could be done without sacrificing information on other important indicators, such as income from farming.Le projet FLINT (Indicateurs au niveau de l'exploitation pour de nouveaux sujets dans l’évaluation des politiques) visait à tester la faisabilité de la collecte de données sur la performance des exploitations en matière de durabilité par le biais du Réseau européen d'information comptable agricole (RICA). Le projet a défini une liste de thèmes de durabilité à partir d'une évaluation des besoins pour les politiques, de la littérature existante et d'une analyse des initiatives nationales pour mesurer la durabilité. Les données ont été recueillies dans neuf États membres (Finlande, France, Allemagne, Grèce, Hongrie, Irlande, Pays†Bas, Pologne et Espagne) à partir de 1 100 exploitations agricoles de différents types. Malgré certains problèmes, principalement liés au caractère initial du projet pilote FLINT, nous concluons que la collecte de données est réalisable, quelle que soit la manière dont un État membre a organisé sa collecte de données pour le RICA. Le projet FLINT a étudié des options pour élargir les résultats de 9 à 28 États membres afin de créer un panel représentatif avec des données de durabilité au niveau de l'exploitation. Cela conduit à la conclusion que l'option la plus attrayante est de réduire l’échantillon actuel du RICA afin de fournir les données de durabilité nécessaires de toute urgence pour améliorer l’évaluation des politiques. Cela pourrait se faire sans sacrifier l'information sur d'autres indicateurs importants, tels que les revenus de l'activité agricole.Das Ziel des FLINT†Projekts (Farm Level Indicators for New Topics in Policy Evaluation) war es, mit Hilfe des Informationsnetzes Landwirtschaftlicher Buchführungen (FADN), die Durchführbarkeit einer Erhebung von Daten zu Nachhaltigkeitsaspekten landwirtschaftlicher Betriebe zu prüfen. Auf der Basis einer Bewertung der politischen Notwendigkeiten, der Analyse der bestehenden Literatur und einer Überprüfung von nationalen Initiativen zur Messung von Nachhaltigkeit wurde im Rahmen des Projekts eine Liste von Nachhaltigkeitsthemen definiert. In neun EU†Mitgliedsstaaten (Finnland, Frankreich, Deutschland, Griechenland, Ungarn, Irland, die Niederlande, Polen und Spanien) wurden von 1.100 landwirtschaftlichen Betrieben Daten erhoben. Obwohl es einige Probleme gab – hauptsächlich aufgrund des Pilotcharakters des Projekts – kommen wir zu dem Schluss, dass die Erhebung von Daten zu Nachhaltigkeitsaspekten durchführbar ist, unabhängig davon, wie in den Mitgliedsstaaten die Erhebung der FADN†Daten organisiert ist. Das FLINT†Projekt hat zudem verschiedene Optionen untersucht, die erzielten Ergebnisse für die neun Mitgliedsstaaten auf alle 28 zu extrapolieren, um so eine repräsentative Stichprobe mit Daten zu diesen Aspekten zu schaffen. Aus unserer Sicht ist die attraktivste Option, die gegenwärtige FADN†Stichprobengröße zu reduzieren. So können die für die Bewertung politischer Maßnahmen dringend benötigten Nachhaltigkeitsdaten von landwirtschaftlichen Betrieben zur Verfügung gestellt werden. Dieses ist ohne einen Informationsverlust im Hinblick auf andere wichtige Indikatoren, wie dem Einkommen, möglich.

Suggested Citation

  • Krijn Poppe & Hans Vrolijk, 2018. "Microdata: a critical source for policy evaluation," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 17(1), pages 28-35, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:17:y:2018:i:1:p:28-35
    DOI: 10.1111/1746-692X.12169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12169
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1746-692X.12169?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Koester, Ulrich & Loy, Jens-Peter, 2016. "Policy evaluation on the basis of the Farm Accountancy Data Network," IAMO Policy Briefs 29e, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    2. Herrera, Beatriz & Gerster-Bentaya, Maria & Knierim, Andrea, 2016. "Stakeholders’ perceptions of sustainability measurement at farm level," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 118(3), pages 1-7, December.
    3. Koester, Ulrich & Loy, Jens-Peter, 2016. "Policy evaluation on the basis of the Farm Accountancy Data Network," IAMO Policy Briefs 249969, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    4. Herrera, B. & Gerster-Bentaya, M. & Knierim, A., 2016. "Stakeholders’ perceptions of sustainability measurement at farm level," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 51, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Poppe, Krijn & Vrolijk, Hans & van Dijk, Roeland, 2021. "Design of a System for Information Transfer to Reduce Administrative Burdens in the Agrifood Sector," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 12(04), December.
    2. Louise O Fresco & Floor Geerling-Eiff & Anne-Charlotte Hoes & Lan van Wassenaer & Krijn J Poppe & Jack G A J van der Vorst, 2021. "Sustainable food systems: do agricultural economists have a role? [Interdisciplinary collaboration between natural and social sciences–status and trends exemplified in groundwater research]," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 48(4), pages 694-718.
    3. Javier Castaño & Maria Blanco & Pilar Martinez, 2019. "Reviewing Counterfactual Analyses to Assess Impacts of EU Rural Development Programmes: What Lessons Can Be Learned from the 2007–2013 Ex-Post Evaluations?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Mili, Samir & Martínez-Vega, Javier, 2018. "Evaluating Agricultural Sustainability in Spanish Provinces," 166th Seminar, August 30-31, 2018, Galway, West of Ireland 276206, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Roberto Cagliero & Andrea Arzeni & Federica Cisilino & Alessandro Montelelone & Patrizia Borsotto, 2021. "Ten years after: Diffusion, criticism and potential improvements in the use of FADN for Rural Development assessment in Italy," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 23(3), pages 1-24.
    6. Samir Mili & Javier Martínez-Vega, 2019. "Accounting for Regional Heterogeneity of Agricultural Sustainability in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hans Vrolijk & Krijn Poppe, 2021. "Cost of Extending the Farm Accountancy Data Network to the Farm Sustainability Data Network: Empirical Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Ogawa, Keishi & Garrod, Guy & Yagi, Hironori, 2023. "Sustainability strategies and stakeholder management for upland farming," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    3. Vaida Sapolaite & Armands Veveris & Artiom Volkov & Virginia Namiotko, 2019. "Dynamics in the Agricultural Sectors of the Baltic States: the Effects of the Common Agricultural Policy and Challenges for the Future," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 15(4), pages 211-223.
    4. Beatriz Herrera Sabillón & Maria Gerster‐Bentaya & Andrea Knierim, 2022. "Measuring farmers' well‐being: Influence of farm‐level factors on satisfaction with work and quality of life," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 452-471, June.
    5. Ana MARTA-COSTA & Vitor MARTINHO & Micael SANTOS, 2017. "Productive Efficiency Of Portuguese Vineyard Regions," Regional Science Inquiry, Hellenic Association of Regional Scientists, vol. 0(2), pages 97-107, December.
    6. Arzeni, Andrea & Ascione, Elisa & Borsotto, Patrizia & Carta, Valentina & Castellotti, Tatiana & Vagnozzi, Anna, 2021. "Analysis of farms characteristics related to innovation needs: a proposal for supporting the public decision-making process," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    7. Irene Tzouramani & Stamatis Mantziaris & Pavlos Karanikolas, 2020. "Assessing Sustainability Performance at the Farm Level: Examples from Greek Agricultural Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-22, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:17:y:2018:i:1:p:28-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.