IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ehsrev/v57y2004i1p142-160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trade, empire, and the fiscal context of imperial business during decolonization

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Stockwell

Abstract

Recent studies have shown convincingly that no ‘neocolonialist’ conspiracies were hatched to perpetuate British commercial dominance in the former colonies after independence, and that relations between individual firms and policy‐makers were frequently troubled. In acknowledging the force of this general proposition, however, there is a risk of neglecting the still significant place of commercial considerations in state policy making. By relocating the relationship of trade and empire in the 1950s in an examination of a hitherto neglected dimension of British taxation policy, this article demonstrates that the Conservative government sought to assist British business with colonial interests at a time when these firms faced new uncertainties.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Stockwell, 2004. "Trade, empire, and the fiscal context of imperial business during decolonization," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 57(1), pages 142-160, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ehsrev:v:57:y:2004:i:1:p:142-160
    DOI: 10.1111/j.0013-0017.2004.00275.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0013-0017.2004.00275.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.0013-0017.2004.00275.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fieldhouse, D. K., 1994. "Merchant Capital and Economic Decolonization: The United Africa Company 1929-1987," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198226253.
    2. Nicholas J. White, 2000. "The business and the politics of decolonization: the British experience in the twentieth century[An embryon]," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 53(3), pages 544-564, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arinze Nwokolo, 2018. "Oil Price Shocks and Civil Conflict: Evidence from Nigeria," HiCN Working Papers 274, Households in Conflict Network.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Geoffrey G. Jones, 2015. "Business Groups Exist in Developed Markets Also: Britain Since 1850," Harvard Business School Working Papers 16-066, Harvard Business School.
    2. Fenske, James, 2013. "“Rubber will not keep in this country”: Failed development in Benin, 1897–1921," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 316-333.
    3. Fenske, James, 2013. "“Rubber will not keep in this country”: Failed development in Benin, 1897–1921," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 316-333.
    4. Arinze Nwokolo, 2018. "Oil Price Shocks and Civil Conflict: Evidence from Nigeria," HiCN Working Papers 274, Households in Conflict Network.
    5. repec:bla:jomstd:v:47:y:2010:i:s1:p:791-813 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Klas Rönnbäck & Oskar Broberg & Stefania Galli, 2022. "A colonial cash cow: the return on investments in British Malaya, 1889–1969," Cliometrica, Journal of Historical Economics and Econometric History, Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC), vol. 16(1), pages 149-173, January.
    7. Ryo Izawa, 2018. "Corporate Structural Change for Tax Avoidance: British Multinational Enterprises and International Double Taxation between the First and Second World Wars," Discussion Papers CRR Discussion Paper Series A: General 33, Shiga University, Faculty of Economics,Center for Risk Research.
    8. Abdelrehim, Neveen & Maltby, Josephine & Toms, Steven, 2012. "Accounting for power and control: The Anglo-Iranian oil nationalisation of 1951," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 23(7), pages 595-607.
    9. Geoffrey Jones, 2008. "Blonde and blue‐eyed? Globalizing beauty, c.1945–c.19801," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 61(1), pages 125-154, February.
    10. Geoffrey Jones & Peter Miskell, 2005. "European integration and corporate restructuring: the strategy of Unilever, c.1957–c.1990," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 58(1), pages 113-139, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ehsrev:v:57:y:2004:i:1:p:142-160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ehsukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.