IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecopol/v36y2024i3p1731-1762.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managerial ability and accounting comparability: Evidence from Chinese listed firms

Author

Listed:
  • Lu Zhang
  • Boyang Hao
  • Dan Yang
  • Guojun Wang

Abstract

We explore the impact of management team ability on firm‐level accounting comparability. Through using a sample of Chinese listed firms from 2009 to 2022, the paper documents that accounting comparability has an inverse U‐shaped association with management team ability where a certain level of managerial ability leads to the highest levels of accounting comparability. Further analysis shows that high‐ability managers have different incentives on accounting comparability when compared to low‐ability managers, especially when they suffer financing constraints, possess more proprietary information, experience weak market environment, bear excessive price risk and risk premium and work in the politically connected firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu Zhang & Boyang Hao & Dan Yang & Guojun Wang, 2024. "Managerial ability and accounting comparability: Evidence from Chinese listed firms," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 1731-1762, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:36:y:2024:i:3:p:1731-1762
    DOI: 10.1111/ecpo.12308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12308
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ecpo.12308?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:36:y:2024:i:3:p:1731-1762. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0954-1985 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.