IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v42y2024i2ne12757.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sudan's health sector partnership: From confined progression to openness and hope to uncertain demise

Author

Listed:
  • Huzeifa Aweesha
  • Anna‐Karin Hurtig
  • Anni‐Maria Pulkki‐Brännström
  • Miguel San Sebastian

Abstract

Motivation Despite the signature of the 2005 Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness and subsequent adoption of the principles of effective development co‐operation (EDC) for better health co‐operation, there is a gap in documenting the challenges to implement these commitments at country level. Sudan represents an interesting case study. The country adopted a local health compact in 2014, but for much of the time since the regime had been under sanction. Sudan witnessed a revolution in 2018, followed by a counter‐coup in 2021. Purpose: We aim to explore the evolution of the relationships, perspectives, and compliance of Sudan's health sector partners in terms of the EDC principles of ownership, alignment, and harmonization, while accounting for underlying processes and context changes between 2015 and 2022. Methods and approach We collected data through two rounds of interviews, in 2015 (16) and 2022 (8), with stakeholders within the Sudan Health Sector Partnership. We used the framework method for data analysis where responses are coded and then sorted into themes. Findings Before the 2019 revolution, co‐operation was progressive but restricted, with civil society marginalized and a dominating government. The EDC principles, especially ownership, were misused and misaligned with national priorities driven by donors' interests and conditions. The transition period (post‐revolution) witnessed an influx of partners, characterized by their openness, but unstable leadership and subsequent changes in priorities led to wasted opportunities. Following the coup, donors adopted a no‐contact policy towards the de facto government. The expectation was that civil society organizations would replace the government as the main implementers. Overall, limited co‐ordination capacity and no sustainability measures were present throughout. Policy implications Much of what was observed was due to the often complicated and difficult context of the governance of Sudan. However, general issues arose, including the government's ability to co‐ordinate policy and implementation; the need for stable, legitimate arrangements; and the need to define the role of civil society and empower civil society organizations. In a complex and volatile context, revisiting partners' commitments through joint compact reviews and transparent EDC progress monitoring is crucial.

Suggested Citation

  • Huzeifa Aweesha & Anna‐Karin Hurtig & Anni‐Maria Pulkki‐Brännström & Miguel San Sebastian, 2024. "Sudan's health sector partnership: From confined progression to openness and hope to uncertain demise," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 42(2), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:42:y:2024:i:2:n:e12757
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12757
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12757
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.12757?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sundewall, Jesper & Jönsson, Kristina & Cheelo, Caesar & Tomson, Göran, 2010. "Stakeholder perceptions of aid coordination implementation in the Zambian health sector," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(2-3), pages 122-128, May.
    2. Pallas, Sarah Wood & Khuat, Thi Hai Oanh & Le, Quang Duong & Ruger, Jennifer Prah, 2015. "The changing donor landscape of health sector aid to Vietnam: A qualitative case study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 165-172.
    3. Stephen Brown, 2020. "Foreign aid, the mining sector and democratic ownership: The case of Canadian assistance to Peru," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 38(S1), pages 13-31, May.
    4. Caroline Hughes & Jane Hutchison, 2012. "Development Effectiveness and the Politics of Commitment," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 17-36.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pallas, Sarah Wood & Ruger, Jennifer Prah, 2017. "Effects of donor proliferation in development aid for health on health program performance: A conceptual framework," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 177-186.
    2. Malin Hasselskog, 2020. "What happens to local participation when national ownership gets stronger? Initiating an exploration in Rwanda and Cambodia," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 38(S1), pages 91-111, May.
    3. Yoojin Lim & Youngwan Kim & Daniel Connolly, 2023. "Assessing the impact of aid on public health expenditure in aid recipient countries," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(1), January.
    4. Muhammad Zulkifli & Firmanzah & Tengku Ezni Balqiah & Mohammad Hamsal, 2020. "Achieving Agility and Dynamic Capabilities on Sustainable Performance: Evidence from the Upstream Oil and Gas Sector," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 1043-1056.
    5. Han, Lu & Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias & Opsahl, Tore, 2018. "The social network of international health aid," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 67-74.
    6. Rik Habraken & Lau Schulpen & Paul Hoebink, 2017. "Putting promises into practice: The New Aid Architecture in Uganda," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 35(6), pages 779-795, November.
    7. Niels Keijzer & David Black, 2020. "Special issue introduction Ownership in a post‐aid effectiveness era: Comparative perspectives," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 38(S1), pages 1-12, May.
    8. David Black, 2020. "Development co‐operation and the partnership–ownership nexus: Lessons from the Canada–Ghana experience," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 38(S1), pages 112-132, May.
    9. Lettieri, Emanuele & Bartoli, Laura & Masella, Cristina, 2013. "Coordinating intra-sector services in healthcare: Requirements and elements that managers should take into account," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 591-601.
    10. Md Ismail Hossain & Md Istiak Hossain & Mollah Aminul Islam & Md Reza Sultanuzzaman, 2022. "Does Foreign Aid Have an Expected Role in the Economic Growth of Bangladesh? An Analysis in ARDL Approach," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 12(6), pages 113-126, November.
    11. Laura Routley & David Hulme, 2013. "Donors, development agencies and the use of political economic analysis: getting to grips with the politics of development?," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-019-13, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    12. Debapriya Bhattacharya & Towfiqul Islam Khan & Najeeba Mohammed Altaf, 2023. "Unpacking 'ownership' in development co-operation effectiveness: Perspectives of Southern recipients," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2023-28, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:42:y:2024:i:2:n:e12757. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.