IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/corgov/v13y2005i6p847-855.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accessing Board Positions: a comparison of female and male board members’ views

Author

Listed:
  • Alison Sheridan
  • Gina Milgate

Abstract

In Australia, as in many Western industrialised countries, women accessing corporate board positions are still the exception to the rule. This paper reports research exploring men's and women's views on the factors crucial in attaining a board position. While both groups identified the importance of a strong track record, a good understanding of business principles and business contacts in gaining board positions, we found that women also highlighted the importance of high visibility and family contacts to account for their nomination to boards. It seems that women's competence has to be widely acknowledged in the public domain or through family connections before boards, or their nominating committees, will be prepared to “risk” having a woman on the board.

Suggested Citation

  • Alison Sheridan & Gina Milgate, 2005. "Accessing Board Positions: a comparison of female and male board members’ views," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(6), pages 847-855, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:corgov:v:13:y:2005:i:6:p:847-855
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00475.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00475.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00475.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aila Virtanen, 2012. "Women on the boards of listed companies: Evidence from Finland," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 16(4), pages 571-593, November.
    2. Katarzyna Burzynska & Gabriela Contreras, 2020. "Affirmative action programs and network benefits in the number of board positions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-26, August.
    3. Tao-Schuchardt, Martin & Kammerlander, Nadine, 2024. "Board diversity in family firms across cultures: A contingency analysis on the effects of gender and tenure diversity on firm performance," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 15(2).
    4. Tomáš Michalička & Drahoslav Lančarič & Kristína Hudecová, 2022. "Determinants Of Board Gender Equality," Economy & Business Journal, International Scientific Publications, Bulgaria, vol. 16(1), pages 443-451.
    5. Zenovia Cristiana Pop & Anca Borza & Ovidiu Niculae Bordea, 2015. "Analysing The Corporate Mindset On Women Board Membership," GUT FME Conference Publications, in: Katarzyna Stankiewicz (ed.),Contemporary Issues and Challenges in Human Resource Management, chapter 12, pages 133-141, Faculty of Management and Economics, Gdansk University of Technology.
    6. Parrotta, Pierpaolo & Smith, Nina, 2013. "Why So Few Women on Boards of Directors? Empirical Evidence from Danish Companies 1997-2007," IZA Discussion Papers 7678, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. O. J. Ilaboya & G. Ohiokha & M. O. Izevbekhai, 2016. "Determinants Of Board Size And Composition: A Comparative Study Of Nigerian And Malaysian Quoted Companies," Economic Thought and Practice, Department of Economics and Business, University of Dubrovnik, vol. 25(2), pages 423-444, december.
    8. Sabrina Wieland & Benjamin Flavel, 2015. "The influence of gender diverse corporate boards on employee-orientation," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 19(4), pages 825-848, November.
    9. Maria Boutchkova & Angelica Gonzalez & Brian G.M. Main & Vathunyoo Sila, 2021. "Gender diversity and the spillover effects of women on boards," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 2-21, January.
    10. Giovanna Campopiano & Patricia Gabaldón & Daniela Gimenez-Jimenez, 2023. "Women Directors and Corporate Social Performance: An Integrative Review of the Literature and a Future Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(3), pages 717-746, January.
    11. Katja Rost & Margit Osterloh, 2008. "You Pay a Fee for Strong Beliefs: Homogeneity as a Driver of Corporate Governance Failure," CREMA Working Paper Series 2008-28, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    12. Luong, Hoa & Khedmati, Mehdi & Nguyen, Lan Anh & Nigmonov, Asror & Ovi, Nafisa Zabeen & Shams, Syed, 2023. "CEO-director ties and board gender diversity: US evidence," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    13. David UMORU & Micah ELUJEKOR, 2017. "Corporate Management And Banking Industry In Nigeria: Empirical Consideration," Contemporary Economy Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 2(4), pages 172-179.
    14. Ryan Federo & Yuliya Ponomareva & Ruth V. Aguilera & Angel Saz‐Carranza & Carlos Losada, 2020. "Bringing owners back on board: A review of the role of ownership type in board governance," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 348-371, November.
    15. P. López-Delgado & J. Diéguez-Soto, 2020. "Indebtedness in family-managed firms: the moderating role of female directors on the board," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 727-762, August.
    16. Chu, Shaner, 2024. "Are women greener? Board gender diversity and corporate green technology innovation in China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 1001-1020.
    17. Nina Smith & Pierpaolo Parrotta, 2018. "Why so Few Women on Boards of Directors? Empirical Evidence from Danish Companies in 1998–2010," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(2), pages 445-467, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:corgov:v:13:y:2005:i:6:p:847-855. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0964-8410&site=1 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.