IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/corgov/v13y2005i5p667-679.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of the Non‐executive Director: findings of an empirical investigation into the differences between listed and unlisted UK boards

Author

Listed:
  • Tracy Long
  • Victor Dulewicz
  • Keith Gay

Abstract

This study, based on a comparison of the Combined Code Guidelines for non‐executive directors between listed and unlisted boards, suggests that on unlisted boards non‐executive directors have a greater degree of involvement in strategic development, financial monitoring, shareholder communication and overall board contribution than on listed boards, but a lesser degree of involvement in the monitoring of management, the setting of executive remuneration, the appointment and removal of executives, and succession planning. The importance of risk analysis and induction is considered high across both sectors, although board development and independence is considered less important on unlisted boards.

Suggested Citation

  • Tracy Long & Victor Dulewicz & Keith Gay, 2005. "The Role of the Non‐executive Director: findings of an empirical investigation into the differences between listed and unlisted UK boards," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(5), pages 667-679, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:corgov:v:13:y:2005:i:5:p:667-679
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00458.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00458.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00458.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Janet Lee & Greg Shailer, 2008. "The Effect of Board-Related Reforms on Investors' Confidence," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 18(2), pages 123-134, June.
    2. Yeh, Chien Mu & Taylor, Tracy & Hoye, Russell, 2009. "Board roles in organisations with a dual board system: Empirical evidence from Taiwanese nonprofit sport organisations," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 91-100, May.
    3. Pugliese, A. & Bezemer, P.J. & Zattoni, A. & Huse, M. & van den Bosch, F.A.J. & Volberda, H.W., 2009. "Boards of Directors’ Contribution to Strategy: A Literature Review and Research Agenda," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2009-013-STR, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    4. Sharon Kemp, 2010. "Driving Strategy or Just Going through the Motions: An Empirical Study of Boardrooms in the UK," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 1(1), pages 2-18, November.
    5. Goh, Lisa & Gupta, Aditi, 2016. "Remuneration of non-executive directors: Evidence from the UK," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 379-399.
    6. Victor Dulewicz & Keith Gay & Bernard Taylor, 2007. "What Makes an Outstanding Chairman? Findings from the UK Non‐Executive Director of the Year Awards, 2006," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(6), pages 1056-1069, November.
    7. Corinne Cortese, 2009. "A Profile of the Non-Executive Directors of Australia's Largest Companies," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 19(1), pages 33-41, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:corgov:v:13:y:2005:i:5:p:667-679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0964-8410&site=1 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.