IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/canjag/v53y2005i4p307-323.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investment Attractiveness of Afforestation in Canada Inclusive of Carbon Sequestration Benefits

Author

Listed:
  • Denys Yemshanov
  • Daniel W. McKenney
  • Terry Hatton
  • Glenn Fox

Abstract

Afforestation is one of several possible mechanisms available to sequester carbon and help reduce greenhouse gas concentrations. We have developed a spatial Monte Carlo‐based simulation model, Canadian Forest Service—Afforestation Feasibility Model (CFS‐AFM) to help assess the financial attractiveness of afforestation as a means of carbon storage in Canada. The model tracks five carbon pools and simulates costs and benefits of plantation investments. In this paper we simulate three afforestation scenarios that could be used in Canada; plantations using hybrid poplar, hardwoods, and softwoods with average growth rates of 14 and 6–7 m3/ha/year, respectively. The attractiveness of afforestation is driven by regional cost and plantation productivity variation and carbon price expectations. The results indicate that afforestation would be an attractive investment in many areas of the country at carbon prices of $10 per metric ton of CO2 or higher. However, with a zero carbon price, very little afforestation would be financially viable. Thus, with low carbon price expectations, other co‐benefits may be required to make afforestation more attractive to Canadian investors. Le boisement constitue l'un des nombreux moyens qui permettent de capturer le dioxyde de carbone et de diminuer les concentrations de gaz à effet de serre (GES). Nous avons élaboré un modèle spatial de simulation fondé sur la méthode de Monte Carlo, soit le modèle de faisabilité du boisement—Service canadien des forêts, afin d'évaluer l'attrait financier du boisement comme moyen de stockage du carbone au Canada. Le modèle analyse cinq bassins de carbone et calcule les coûts et les avantages d'investir dans des plantations. Dans la présente étude, nous avons élaboré trois scénarios de boisement qui pourraient être utilisés au Canada: des plantations de peupliers hybrides, de feuillus, de résineux ayant des taux de croissance moyens respectifs de 14, 6 et 7 m3/ha/an. L'attrait du boisement est gouverné par la variation du coût et de la productivité d'une plantation selon la région et par les prix attendus du carbone. Les résultats ont montré que le boisement constituerait un investissement attrayant dans bien des régions du pays si le prix du CO2 avoisinait les 10 $ ou plus la tonne métrique. Par contre, si le prix du carbone est nul, très peu de boisements seraient financièrement viables. Par conséquent, en raison des faibles prix attendus du carbone, il faudra obtenir des avantages accessoires pour rendre le boisement attrayant.

Suggested Citation

  • Denys Yemshanov & Daniel W. McKenney & Terry Hatton & Glenn Fox, 2005. "Investment Attractiveness of Afforestation in Canada Inclusive of Carbon Sequestration Benefits," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 53(4), pages 307-323, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:canjag:v:53:y:2005:i:4:p:307-323
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7976.2005.00021.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.2005.00021.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1744-7976.2005.00021.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Toman, Michael & Kerr, Suzi & Sedjo, Roger & Birdsey, Richard & Kauppi, Pekka & Noble, Ian & Brown, Sandra & Krankina, Olga & Moura-Costa, Pedro, 2001. "Can Carbon Sinks be Operational? An RFF Workshop Summary," RFF Working Paper Series dp-01-26, Resources for the Future.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yemshanov, Denys & McCarney, Geoffrey R. & Hauer, Grant & Luckert, M.K. (Marty) & Unterschultz, Jim & McKenney, Daniel W., 2015. "A real options-net present value approach to assessing land use change: A case study of afforestation in Canada," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 327-336.
    2. Yemshanov, Denys & McKenney, Daniel & Fraleigh, Saul & D'Eon, Steve, 2007. "An integrated spatial assessment of the investment potential of three species in southern Ontario, Canada inclusive of carbon benefits," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(1-2), pages 48-59, December.
    3. Nicolas Mansuy & Sylvie Gauthier & Yves Bergeron, 2013. "Afforestation opportunities when stand productivity is driven by a high risk of natural disturbance: a review of the open lichen woodland in the eastern boreal forest of Canada," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 245-264, February.
    4. Zhen Xu & Carolyn E. Smyth & Tony C. Lemprière & Greg J. Rampley & Werner A. Kurz, 2018. "Climate change mitigation strategies in the forest sector: biophysical impacts and economic implications in British Columbia, Canada," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 257-290, February.
    5. Maraseni, Tek Narayan & Cockfield, Geoff, 2015. "The financial implications of converting farmland to state-supported environmental plantings in the Darling Downs region, Queensland," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 57-65.
    6. Acuña, Eduardo & Rubilar, Rafael & Cancino, Jorge & Albaugh, Timothy J. & Maier, Chris A., 2018. "Economic assessment of Eucalyptus globulus short rotation energy crops under contrasting silvicultural intensities on marginal agricultural land," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 329-337.
    7. van Kooten, G. Cornelis & Sohngen, Brent, 2007. "Economics of Forest Ecosystem Carbon Sinks: A Review," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 1(3), pages 237-269, September.
    8. Sagebiel, Julian & Glenk, Klaus & Meyerhoff, Jürgen, 2017. "Spatially explicit demand for afforestation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 190-199.
    9. Murphy, Rose & Gross, Dominique M. & Jaccard, Mark, 2018. "Use of revealed preference data to estimate the costs of forest carbon sequestration in Canada," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 41-50.
    10. Hou, Guolong & Delang, Claudio O. & Lu, Xixi & Olschewski, Roland, 2020. "Optimizing rotation periods of forest plantations: The effects of carbon accounting regimes," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suzi Kerr, 2003. "Indigenous Forests and Forest Sink Policy in New Zealand," Working Papers 03_15, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    2. Roger Sedjo, 2002. "Wood materials used as a means to reduce greenhouse gases (GHGs): An examination of wooden utility poles," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 191-200, June.
    3. Kenneth Lyon, 2004. "Modeling Timber Supply, Fuel-Wood, and Atmospheric Carbon Mitigation," Working Papers 2004-19, Utah State University, Department of Economics.
    4. Suzi Kerr, 2003. "Efficient Contracts for Carbon Credits from Reforestation Projects," Working Papers 03_12, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    5. Oscar J. Cacho & Graham R. Marshall & Mary Milne, 2003. "Smallholder Agroforestry Projects: Potential for carbon sequestration and poverty alleviation," Working Papers 03-06, Agricultural and Development Economics Division of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO - ESA).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:canjag:v:53:y:2005:i:4:p:307-323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caefmea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.