IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v6y1997i4p232-241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regulation, self‐regulation and environmental consensus: lessons from the UK packaging waste experience

Author

Listed:
  • Sally Eden

Abstract

This paper uses the case study of UK packaging waste policy to illustrate the problems of developing environmental self‐regulation. In July 1993, the UK Secretary of State for the Environment ‘challenged’ British business to organise and run a self‐regulatory scheme to recover between 50 and 75 per cent of packaging waste by 2000. But the response was dogged by differences of opinion within business and a lack of political will from business and government. Consequently, the businesses approached to develop this scheme declared self‐regulation unworkable and lobbied government to introduce national legislation. This case study suggests that self‐regulation works best where it fits the status quo by formalising existing practices or encourages incremental change to those practices. Where major changes to the status quo are needed, self‐regulation may founder because it fails to bind together diverse sectors and companies which are differentially threatened by those changes and thereby fails to ensure voluntary compliance. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Sally Eden, 1997. "Regulation, self‐regulation and environmental consensus: lessons from the UK packaging waste experience," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(4), pages 232-241, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:6:y:1997:i:4:p:232-241
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0836(199709)6:43.0.CO;2-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0836(199709)6:43.0.CO;2-4
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0836(199709)6:43.0.CO;2-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grant, Wyn, 1984. "Large Firms and Public Policy in Britain," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Adrian Smith, 1996. "Voluntary Schemes And The Need For Statutory Regulation: The Case Of Integrated Pollution Control," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 81-86, June.
    3. Sally Eden, 1994. "Business, trust and environmental information: Perceptions from consumers and retailers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(4), pages 1-8.
    4. S. J. Carter & D. F. Ball & P. J. Baron & D. Elliott, 1995. "Environmental auditing: Management strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(2), pages 86-94, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anja Schaefer, 2009. "Corporate greening and changing regulatory regimes: the UK water industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(5), pages 320-333, July.
    2. Tim Benijts, 2014. "A Business Sustainability Model for Government Corporations. A Belgian Case Study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 204-216, March.
    3. Judith Petts & Andrew Herd & Simon Gerrard & Chris Horne, 1999. "The climate and culture of environmental compliance within SMEs," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(1), pages 14-30, January.
    4. Ian Bailey, 1999. "Competition, Sustainability and Packaging Policy in the UK," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 83-102.
    5. Andrea Revell & Robert Rutherfoord, 2003. "UK environmental policy and the small firm: broadening the focus," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(1), pages 26-35, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khan Md Raziuddin Taufique & Chamhuri Siwar & Basri Talib & Farah Hasan Sarah & Norshamliza Chamhuri, 2014. "Synthesis of Constructs for Modeling Consumers’ Understanding and Perception of Eco-Labels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-25, April.
    2. Adrian Smith, 2000. "Policy Networks and Advocacy Coalitions: Explaining Policy Change and Stability in UK Industrial Pollution Policy?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 18(1), pages 95-114, February.
    3. Smith, Adrian & Voß, Jan-Peter & Grin, John, 2010. "Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 435-448, May.
    4. Anja Schaefer, 2009. "Corporate greening and changing regulatory regimes: the UK water industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(5), pages 320-333, July.
    5. Jon Vernon & Stephen Essex & David Pinder & Kaja Curry, 2003. "The ‘greening’ of tourism micro‐businesses: outcomes of focus group investigations in South East Cornwall," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(1), pages 49-69, January.
    6. Claudia E. Henninger, 2015. "Traceability the New Eco-Label in the Slow-Fashion Industry?—Consumer Perceptions and Micro-Organisations Responses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-22, May.
    7. Mohamed Akli Achabou, 2014. "Brand influence on consumer preference for environmental labels," Working Papers 2014-139, Department of Research, Ipag Business School.
    8. Camilla C. Erskine & Lyndhurst Collins, 1997. "Eco-labelling: success or failure?," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 125-133, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:6:y:1997:i:4:p:232-241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.