IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v33y2024i8p8994-9014.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards integrative multi‐stakeholder responsibility for net zero in e‐waste: A systematic literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Dongmei Cao
  • Elmar Puntaier
  • Fatima Gillani
  • Dennis Chapman
  • Sunita Dewitt

Abstract

Despite extensive research on e‐waste management, the integrative responsibilities of multi‐stakeholders and the dependency on technology remain underexplored. This study aims to develop an integrative multi‐stakeholder responsibility model to advance the net‐zero goal in e‐waste management. Following the PRISMA protocol, we conducted a systematic review of 99 articles. The review revealed three themes of stakeholder responsibility, four performance measure categories, three e‐waste solutions, and four roles of smart technologies. These insights informed the development of a conceptual model to enhance environmental performance in e‐waste. The proposed model emphasises critical attributes of multi‐stakeholder relationships, including partnership, shared responsibility, inclusiveness, and transparency; it offers practical guidance for multi‐stakeholders in prioritising efficient and mature technologies to be adopted and diffused, enabling effective e‐waste management. Our study extends stakeholder theory from an organisation‐centric to a problem‐based perspective, highlighting its practical implications for effective e‐waste management and suggesting future research directions for sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Dongmei Cao & Elmar Puntaier & Fatima Gillani & Dennis Chapman & Sunita Dewitt, 2024. "Towards integrative multi‐stakeholder responsibility for net zero in e‐waste: A systematic literature review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 8994-9014, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:8:p:8994-9014
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.3960
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3960
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.3960?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:8:p:8994-9014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.