IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/brjirl/v39y2001i3p433-449.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rhetoric and Employment Relations

Author

Listed:
  • Peter M. Hamilton

Abstract

The term ‘rhetoric’ is widely utilized within writings on employment relations, typically to signify emptiness, manipulation or as a contrast with reality. This paper critiques such usage and argues for employment relations to engage with the discipline of rhetoric. In outlining the parameters of rhetorical analysis in relation to the indeterminacy of the employment relationship and significance of persuasion, it describes how rhetorical studies have featured within the field of industrial relations. The paper ends with a consideration of the social constructionist implications of focusing on discourse and on how rhetorical studies could be further developed.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter M. Hamilton, 2001. "Rhetoric and Employment Relations," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 39(3), pages 433-449, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:brjirl:v:39:y:2001:i:3:p:433-449
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-8543.00208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8543.00208
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-8543.00208?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Janis Bailey & Keith Townsend & Edwina Luck, 2009. "WorkChoices, ImageChoices and the marketing of new industrial relations legislation," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 23(2), pages 285-304, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:brjirl:v:39:y:2001:i:3:p:433-449. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.