IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v78y2022i3p1244-1256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nonhomogeneous Markov chain for estimating the cumulative risk of multiple false positive screening tests

Author

Listed:
  • Marzieh K Golmakani
  • Rebecca A Hubbard
  • Diana L Miglioretti

Abstract

Screening tests are widely recommended for the early detection of disease among asymptomatic individuals. While detecting disease at an earlier stage has the potential to improve outcomes, screening also has negative consequences, including false positive results which may lead to anxiety, unnecessary diagnostic procedures, and increased healthcare costs. In addition, multiple false positive results could discourage participating in subsequent screening rounds. Screening guidelines typically recommend repeated screening over a period of many years, but little prior research has investigated how often individuals receive multiple false positive test results. Estimating the cumulative risk of multiple false positive results over the course of multiple rounds of screening is challenging due to the presence of censoring and competing risks, which may depend on the false positive risk, screening round, and number of prior false positive results. To address the general challenge of estimating the cumulative risk of multiple false positive test results, we propose a nonhomogeneous multistate model to describe the screening process including competing events. We developed alternative approaches for estimating the cumulative risk of multiple false positive results using this multistate model based on existing estimators for the cumulative risk of a single false positive. We compared the performance of the newly proposed models through simulation studies and illustrate model performance using data on screening mammography from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Across most simulation scenarios, the multistate extension of a censoring bias model demonstrated lower bias compared to other approaches. In the context of screening mammography, we found that the cumulative risk of multiple false positive results is high. For instance, based on the censoring bias model, for a high‐risk individual, the cumulative probability of at least two false positive mammography results after 10 rounds of annual screening is 40.4.

Suggested Citation

  • Marzieh K Golmakani & Rebecca A Hubbard & Diana L Miglioretti, 2022. "Nonhomogeneous Markov chain for estimating the cumulative risk of multiple false positive screening tests," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 1244-1256, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:78:y:2022:i:3:p:1244-1256
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.13484
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13484
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.13484?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Scharfstein & James M. Robins & Wesley Eddings & Andrea Rotnitzky, 2001. "Inference in Randomized Studies with Informative Censoring and Discrete Time-to-Event Endpoints," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 404-413, June.
    2. Rebecca A. Hubbard & Diana L. Miglioretti, 2013. "A Semiparametric Censoring Bias Model for Estimating the Cumulative Risk of a False-Positive Screening Test Under Dependent Censoring," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(1), pages 245-253, March.
    3. Jian-Lun Xu & Richard M. Fagerstrom & Philip C. Prorok & Barnett S. Kramer, 2004. "Estimating the Cumulative Risk of a False-Positive Test in a Repeated Screening Program," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(3), pages 651-660, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiao Xu & Tao Song & Jiaxin Wang, 2024. "Finite-Time Fuzzy Fault-Tolerant Control for Nonlinear Flexible Spacecraft System with Stochastic Actuator Faults," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-25, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rebecca A. Hubbard & Diana L. Miglioretti, 2013. "A Semiparametric Censoring Bias Model for Estimating the Cumulative Risk of a False-Positive Screening Test Under Dependent Censoring," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(1), pages 245-253, March.
    2. Stuart G. Baker, 2013. "Letter to the Editor: “Comment on Hubbard and Miglioretti (2013), Consider Also a Selection Model for the Cumulative Risk of False Positive Screening Tests”," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(4), pages 1084-1084, December.
    3. Sedigheh Mirzaei Salehabadi & Debasis Sengupta & Rituparna Das, 2015. "Parametric Estimation of Menarcheal Age Distribution Based on Recall Data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(1), pages 290-305, March.
    4. Miran A. Jaffa & Ayad A. Jaffa, 2019. "A Likelihood-Based Approach with Shared Latent Random Parameters for the Longitudinal Binary and Informative Censoring Processes," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 11(3), pages 597-613, December.
    5. Jie Zhu & Blanca Gallego, 2021. "Continuous Treatment Recommendation with Deep Survival Dose Response Function," Papers 2108.10453, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2023.
    6. Xuelin Huang & Nan Zhang, 2008. "Regression Survival Analysis with an Assumed Copula for Dependent Censoring: A Sensitivity Analysis Approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(4), pages 1090-1099, December.
    7. Miguel A. Hernán & James M. Robins & Luis A. García Rodríguez, 2005. "Discussion on "Statistical Issues Arising in the Women's Health Initiative"," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(4), pages 922-930, December.
    8. Ming-Wen An & Constantine E. Frangakis & Beverly S. Musick & Constantin T. Yiannoutsos, 2009. "The Need for Double-Sampling Designs in Survival Studies: An Application to Monitor PEPFAR," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(1), pages 301-306, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:78:y:2022:i:3:p:1244-1256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.