IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v76y2020i3p995-1006.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying disease‐associated biomarker network features through conditional graphical model

Author

Listed:
  • Shanghong Xie
  • Xiang Li
  • Peter McColgan
  • Rachael I. Scahill
  • Donglin Zeng
  • Yuanjia Wang

Abstract

Biomarkers are often organized into networks, in which the strengths of network connections vary across subjects depending on subject‐specific covariates (eg, genetic variants). Variation of network connections, as subject‐specific feature variables, has been found to predict disease clinical outcome. In this work, we develop a two‐stage method to estimate biomarker networks that account for heterogeneity among subjects and evaluate network's association with disease clinical outcome. In the first stage, we propose a conditional Gaussian graphical model with mean and precision matrix depending on covariates to obtain covariate‐dependent networks with connection strengths varying across subjects while assuming homogeneous network structure. In the second stage, we evaluate clinical utility of network measures (connection strengths) estimated from the first stage. The second‐stage analysis provides the relative predictive power of between‐region network measures on clinical impairment in the context of regional biomarkers and existing disease risk factors. We assess the performance of proposed method by extensive simulation studies and application to a Huntington's disease (HD) study to investigate the effect of HD causal gene on the rate of change in motor symptom through affecting brain subcortical and cortical gray matter atrophy connections. We show that cortical network connections and subcortical volumes, but not subcortical connections are identified to be predictive of clinical motor function deterioration. We validate these findings in an independent HD study. Lastly, highly similar patterns seen in the gray matter connections and a previous white matter connectivity study suggest a shared biological mechanism for HD and support the hypothesis that white matter loss is a direct result of neuronal loss as opposed to the loss of myelin or dysmyelination.

Suggested Citation

  • Shanghong Xie & Xiang Li & Peter McColgan & Rachael I. Scahill & Donglin Zeng & Yuanjia Wang, 2020. "Identifying disease‐associated biomarker network features through conditional graphical model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(3), pages 995-1006, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:76:y:2020:i:3:p:995-1006
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.13201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13201
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.13201?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peng, Jie & Wang, Pei & Zhou, Nengfeng & Zhu, Ji, 2009. "Partial Correlation Estimation by Joint Sparse Regression Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 104(486), pages 735-746.
    2. Mengjie Chen & Zhao Ren & Hongyu Zhao & Harrison Zhou, 2016. "Asymptotically Normal and Efficient Estimation of Covariate-Adjusted Gaussian Graphical Model," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(513), pages 394-406, March.
    3. Jie Cheng & Elizaveta Levina & Pei Wang & Ji Zhu, 2014. "A sparse ising model with covariates," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(4), pages 943-953, December.
    4. Patrick Danaher & Pei Wang & Daniela M. Witten, 2014. "The joint graphical lasso for inverse covariance estimation across multiple classes," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 76(2), pages 373-397, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiao Guo & Hai Zhang, 2020. "Sparse directed acyclic graphs incorporating the covariates," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(5), pages 2119-2148, October.
    2. Jie Jian & Peijun Sang & Mu Zhu, 2024. "Two Gaussian Regularization Methods for Time-Varying Networks," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 29(4), pages 853-873, December.
    3. Young-Geun Choi & Seunghwan Lee & Donghyeon Yu, 2022. "An efficient parallel block coordinate descent algorithm for large-scale precision matrix estimation using graphics processing units," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 419-443, March.
    4. Claudia Angelini & Daniela De Canditiis & Anna Plaksienko, 2021. "Jewel : A Novel Method for Joint Estimation of Gaussian Graphical Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(17), pages 1-24, August.
    5. Jiaqi Zhang & Xinyan Fan & Yang Li & Shuangge Ma, 2022. "Heterogeneous graphical model for non‐negative and non‐Gaussian PM2.5 data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(5), pages 1303-1329, November.
    6. Wang, Ke & Franks, Alexander & Oh, Sang-Yun, 2023. "Learning Gaussian graphical models with latent confounders," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    7. Mingyang Ren & Sanguo Zhang & Qingzhao Zhang & Shuangge Ma, 2022. "Gaussian graphical model‐based heterogeneity analysis via penalized fusion," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(2), pages 524-535, June.
    8. Huihang Liu & Xinyu Zhang, 2023. "Frequentist model averaging for undirected Gaussian graphical models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 2050-2062, September.
    9. Yang Ni & Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani & Marina Vannucci & Francesco C. Stingo, 2022. "Bayesian graphical models for modern biological applications," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 31(2), pages 197-225, June.
    10. Fan, Xinyan & Zhang, Qingzhao & Ma, Shuangge & Fang, Kuangnan, 2021. "Conditional score matching for high-dimensional partial graphical models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    11. Lee, Wonyul & Liu, Yufeng, 2012. "Simultaneous multiple response regression and inverse covariance matrix estimation via penalized Gaussian maximum likelihood," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 241-255.
    12. Seunghwan Lee & Sang Cheol Kim & Donghyeon Yu, 2023. "An efficient GPU-parallel coordinate descent algorithm for sparse precision matrix estimation via scaled lasso," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 217-242, March.
    13. Zemin Zheng & Jie Zhang & Yang Li, 2022. "L 0 -Regularized Learning for High-Dimensional Additive Hazards Regression," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 2762-2775, September.
    14. Ines Wilms & Jacob Bien, 2021. "Tree-based Node Aggregation in Sparse Graphical Models," Papers 2101.12503, arXiv.org.
    15. Dong Liu & Changwei Zhao & Yong He & Lei Liu & Ying Guo & Xinsheng Zhang, 2023. "Simultaneous cluster structure learning and estimation of heterogeneous graphs for matrix‐variate fMRI data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 2246-2259, September.
    16. Mehran Aflakparast & Mathisca de Gunst & Wessel van Wieringen, 2020. "Analysis of Twitter data with the Bayesian fused graphical lasso," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-28, July.
    17. Alessandro Casa & Andrea Cappozzo & Michael Fop, 2022. "Group-Wise Shrinkage Estimation in Penalized Model-Based Clustering," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 39(3), pages 648-674, November.
    18. Zhu, Xiaonan & Chen, Yu & Hu, Jie, 2024. "Estimation of banded time-varying precision matrix based on SCAD and group lasso," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    19. Wessel N. van Wieringen & Carel F. W. Peeters & Renee X. de Menezes & Mark A. van de Wiel, 2018. "Testing for pathway (in)activation by using Gaussian graphical models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(5), pages 1419-1436, November.
    20. Byol Kim & Song Liu & Mladen Kolar, 2021. "Two‐sample inference for high‐dimensional Markov networks," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 83(5), pages 939-962, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:76:y:2020:i:3:p:995-1006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.