IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausecr/v35y2002i3p261-275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Surveying Mobile Populations: Lessons from Recent Longitudinal Surveys of Indigenous Australians

Author

Listed:
  • B. H. Hunter
  • D. E. Smith

Abstract

Geographically mobile populations are notoriously difficult to survey, especially in a cross–cultural context. In broad terms, it is difficult to ensure that respondents are representative of the underlying population, can be relocated, and that data obtained are relevant to them. At a practical level, the problem can be as basic as not having any well–formed notion of what defines a household. Consequently, the resulting analysis of households is at best imprecise and, at worst, conceptually confused. This article documents the lessons for the design and conduct of longitudinal data collection from three recent surveys of an exceptionally mobile population, Indigenous Australians. There appears to be a trade–off between cultural relevance, data quality, response rates and survey costs. The use of Indigenous interviewers does not, in itself, guarantee that response rates will be acceptable.

Suggested Citation

  • B. H. Hunter & D. E. Smith, 2002. "Surveying Mobile Populations: Lessons from Recent Longitudinal Surveys of Indigenous Australians," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 35(3), pages 261-275, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausecr:v:35:y:2002:i:3:p:261-275
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-8462.00242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8462.00242
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-8462.00242?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicholas Biddle & Boyd H. Hunter, 2006. "Some Methodological Issues for the 2002 NATSISS," Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE), Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School, vol. 9(1), pages 33-50, March.
    2. Francisco Perales & Bernard Baffour & Francis Mitrou, 2015. "Ethnic Differences in the Quality of the Interview Process and Implications for Survey Analysis: The Case of Indigenous Australians," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Boyd H. Hunter & Matthew C. Gray, 2006. "The Effectiveness of Indigenous Job Search Strategies," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 82(256), pages 1-10, March.
    4. Boyd Hunter & John Taylor, 2001. "Reliability of Indigenous Employment Estimates," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 8(2), pages 113-128.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausecr:v:35:y:2002:i:3:p:261-275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mimelau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.