IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajecsc/v80y2021i2p665-697.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Village Shareholding: Cooperative Economic Organization in Northeast China

Author

Listed:
  • Haoxuan Sa

Abstract

Since the economic reforms of the 1970s, local Chinese urban authorities have requisitioned rural land near cities. To protect their land from these practices, many urban village collectives have established a cooperative shareholding system, but their motives remain unclear. Neoclassical economics suggests that such enterprises seek to maximize profits. Guided by the original institutional‐economics approach, I investigate this question empirically by interviewing residents of Mengke village in Chaoyang city, Liaoning Province, northeast China. These data reveal four startling findings about the motives behind the shareholding system. First, collective economic organizations do not simply seek the maximization of profit. Second, the shareholding cooperative system adopted by village collectives helps villagers resist external threats such as land loss. Third, the collective economic organization is not merely a firm or a single market; it may work as a firm and a market simultaneously. Finally, managing of common property contributes to maintaining the identity of the collective. These findings suggest that the theories of neoclassical urban economics and new institutional economics fundamentally mischaracterize urban cooperatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Haoxuan Sa, 2021. "Urban Village Shareholding: Cooperative Economic Organization in Northeast China," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 80(2), pages 665-697, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:80:y:2021:i:2:p:665-697
    DOI: 10.1111/ajes.12396
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12396
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ajes.12396?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anne Haila, 1999. "Why is Shanghai Building a Giant Speculative Property Bubble?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 583-588, September.
    2. Lai, Yani & Wang, Jiayuan & Lok, Waiming, 2017. "Redefining property rights over collective land in the urban redevelopment of Shenzhen, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 485-493.
    3. Hsing, You-tien, 2010. "The Great Urban Transformation: Politics of Land and Property in China," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199568048, Decembrie.
    4. Williamson, Oliver E, 1981. "The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, Attributes," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 19(4), pages 1537-1568, December.
    5. Sa, Haoxuan, 2020. "Do ambiguous property rights matter? Collective value logic in Lin Village," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    6. Anne Haila, 2007. "The Market as the New Emperor," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 3-20, March.
    7. Dimitris Milonakis & Giorgos Meramveliotakis, 2013. "Homo Economicus and the Economics of Property Rights," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 45(1), pages 5-23, March.
    8. Furubotn, Eirik G & Pejovich, Svetozar, 1972. "Property Rights and Economic Theory: A Survey of Recent Literature," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 10(4), pages 1137-1162, December.
    9. Jessica Gordon Nembhard, 2013. "Community Development Credit Unions: Securing and Protecting Assets in Black Communities," The Review of Black Political Economy, Springer;National Economic Association, vol. 40(4), pages 459-490, December.
    10. David Ellerman, 2015. "The DNA of Enterprise: Jane Jacobs and Henry George on Innovation and Development Through Spin-Offs," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(3), pages 531-549, May.
    11. Zhang, Yanlong & Elsner, Wolfram, 2017. "A social-leverage mechanism on the Silk Road: the private emergence of institutions in central Asia, from the 7th to the 9th century," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(2), pages 379-400, June.
    12. Jieming Zhu, 2002. "Urban Development under Ambiguous Property Rights: A Case of China’s Transition Economy," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 41-57, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Franklin Obeng‐Odoom & Anne Haila, 2024. "The Power Of Uncertified Urban Land," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(5), pages 855-876, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sa, Haoxuan, 2020. "Do ambiguous property rights matter? Collective value logic in Lin Village," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    2. Lin, Wanlin & Lin, George C.S., 2023. "Strategizing actors and agents in the functioning of informal property Rights: The tragicomedy of the extralegal housing market in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    3. Yang, Chen & Qian, Zhu, 2022. "The complexity of property rights embedded in the rural-to-urban resettlement of China: A case of Hangzhou," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    4. Li Tian, 2014. "Property Rights, Land Values and Urban Development," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15856.
    5. Yiming Wang & Jie Chen, 2021. "Privatizing the Urban Commons Under Ambiguous Property Rights in China: Is Marketization a Remedy to the Tragedy of the Commons?," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 80(2), pages 503-547, March.
    6. Jieming Zhu, 2005. "A Transitional Institution for the Emerging Land Market in Urban China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(8), pages 1369-1390, July.
    7. Jiang Xu & Anthony Yeh & Fulong Wu, 2009. "Land Commodification: New Land Development and Politics in China since the Late 1990s," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 890-913, December.
    8. Siebert, Horst, 1987. "Neue Nutzungsrechte und internationale Rohstoffversorgung," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 1348, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    9. Harris,Colin & Cai,Meina & Murtazashvili,Ilia & Murtazashvili,Jennifer Brick, 2020. "The Origins and Consequences of Property Rights," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781108969055, July.
    10. Siebert, Horst, 1986. "Nutzungsrechte und internationale Rohstoffversorgung," Discussion Papers, Series I 218, University of Konstanz, Department of Economics.
    11. Fox ZY Hu, 2015. "Industrial capitalisation and spatial transformation in Chinese cities: Strategic repositioning, state-owned enterprise capitalisation, and the reproduction of urban space in Beijing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(15), pages 2799-2821, November.
    12. Munshifwa, Ephraim Kabunda, 2023. "Institutional analysis and informal urban settlements: A proposition for a new institutionalist grounded property rights perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    13. Yixiang Chen & Xiangmu Jin, 2023. "How Do Farmers Realize Their Rights on the Collective Land in Rural China? An Explanatory Framework for Deconstructing the Subject of Collective Land Ownership," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, September.
    14. George C S Lin, 2021. "Drawing up the missing link: State-society relations and the remaking of urban landscapes in Chinese cities," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(5), pages 917-936, August.
    15. Hyun Bang Shin, 2016. "Economic transition and speculative urbanisation in China: Gentrification versus dispossession," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(3), pages 471-489, February.
    16. Mátyás, Antal, 1996. "A hagyományos közgazdaságtan bírálata és kutatási körének kiszélesítése az új intézményi iskola képviselői részéről [Critique and expansion of the scope of investigation of traditional economics by," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 614-628.
    17. Jiang, Ronghao & Lin, George C.S., 2021. "Placing China’s land marketization: The state, market, and the changing geography of land use in Chinese cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    18. Kamath Shyam J., 1994. "Privatization: A Market Prospect Perspective," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 53-104, March.
    19. Shenjing He & Junxi Qian, 2017. "From an emerging market to a multifaceted urban society: Urban China studies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(4), pages 827-846, March.
    20. Li, L. & Bao, Helen X.H. & Robinson, Guy M., 2020. "The return of state control and its impact on land market efficiency in urban China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:80:y:2021:i:2:p:665-697. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0002-9246 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.