IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v99y2020ics0264837719323385.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do ambiguous property rights matter? Collective value logic in Lin Village

Author

Listed:
  • Sa, Haoxuan

Abstract

Since the 1980s, landed property rights have been the subject of heated debate in China. On the one hand, the OECD and many mainstream economists, China’s road to prosperity is hampered by its system of vaguely-defined rights to land which, according to these analysts, is preventing the efficient use of land and causing social conflicts. On the other hand, critics of private property rights theory argue that the axiomatic denunciation of ambiguous property rights one-sidedly privileges economic efficiency at the expense of social, cultural and ethical considerations. This polarised debate raises the question, ‘Do ambiguous property rights matter?’ To address this question, this article analyses the negotiations around a development project in Lin Village, Xiamen. In this relatively affluent urban village, differing conceptions of the ownership of land have not posed any impediment to the joint development projects successfully carried out by villagers, Lin Village Collective and the local government. This evidence questions the claim that a private property rights system is prerequisite for transformative urban development irrespective of context. Lin Village’s land use system, an alternative to private land tenure relations, suggests that the collective value logic, defended by land economists of the original institutional economics school, offers an alternative to the private, exclusionary model of urban development.

Suggested Citation

  • Sa, Haoxuan, 2020. "Do ambiguous property rights matter? Collective value logic in Lin Village," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:99:y:2020:i:c:s0264837719323385
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837719323385
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105066?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ronald H. Coase, 2008. "The Institutional Structure of Production," Springer Books, in: Claude Ménard & Mary M. Shirley (ed.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics, chapter 2, pages 31-39, Springer.
    2. Anne Haila, 2009. "Chinese Alternatives," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 572-575, June.
    3. Qi Guo & Canfei He & Deyu Li, 2016. "Entrepreneurship in China: The role of localisation and urbanisation economies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(12), pages 2584-2606, September.
    4. Franklin Obeng-Odoom, 2018. "Valuing unregistered urban land in Indonesia," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 315-340, December.
    5. Karita Kan, 2019. "Accumulation without Dispossession? Land Commodification and Rent Extraction in Peri‐urban China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 633-648, July.
    6. Audrey Redford, 2020. "Property rights, entrepreneurship, and economic development," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 33(1), pages 139-161, March.
    7. Li Tian, 2008. "The Chengzhongcun Land Market in China: Boon or Bane? — A Perspective on Property Rights," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 282-304, June.
    8. Webster, Chris & Wu, Fulong & Zhang, Fangzhu & Sarkar, Chinmoy, 2016. "Informality, property rights, and poverty in China’s “favelas”," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 461-476.
    9. Dimitris Milonakis & Giorgos Meramveliotakis, 2013. "Homo Economicus and the Economics of Property Rights," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 45(1), pages 5-23, March.
    10. Lai, Yani & Wang, Jiayuan & Lok, Waiming, 2017. "Redefining property rights over collective land in the urban redevelopment of Shenzhen, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 485-493.
    11. Scott Lash, 2009. "Against Institutionalism," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 567-571, June.
    12. Anonymous, 1961. "Food and Agriculture Organization," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(1), pages 188-190, January.
    13. Jieming Zhu, 2002. "Urban Development under Ambiguous Property Rights: A Case of China’s Transition Economy," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 41-57, March.
    14. Anonymous, 1961. "Food and Agriculture Organization," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(4), pages 703-705, October.
    15. Franklin Obeng-Odoom, 2016. "The Meaning, Prospects, and Future of the Commons: Revisiting the Legacies of Elinor Ostrom and Henry George," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(2), pages 372-414, March.
    16. Anne Haila, 2007. "The Market as the New Emperor," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 3-20, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yixiang Chen & Xiangmu Jin, 2023. "How Do Farmers Realize Their Rights on the Collective Land in Rural China? An Explanatory Framework for Deconstructing the Subject of Collective Land Ownership," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Shiran Zhang & Jiaping Yang & Changdong Ye & Weixuan Chen & Yixuan Li, 2023. "Sustainable Development of Industrial Renovation: Renovation Paths of Village-Level Industrial Parks in Pearl River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
    3. Yang Liu & Jiajun Qiao & Jie Xiao & Dong Han & Tao Pan, 2022. "Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Rural Revitalization and an Improvement Path: A Typical Old Revolutionary Cultural Area as an Example," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-24, October.
    4. Yang, Chen & Qian, Zhu, 2022. "The complexity of property rights embedded in the rural-to-urban resettlement of China: A case of Hangzhou," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    5. Yiming Wang & Jie Chen, 2021. "Privatizing the Urban Commons Under Ambiguous Property Rights in China: Is Marketization a Remedy to the Tragedy of the Commons?," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 80(2), pages 503-547, March.
    6. Haoxuan Sa, 2021. "Urban Village Shareholding: Cooperative Economic Organization in Northeast China," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 80(2), pages 665-697, March.
    7. Yuan Yi & Kaifeng Duan & Fang He & Yuxuan Si, 2024. "The Effects and Mechanisms of the Rural Homestead System on the Imbalance of Rural Human–Land Relationships: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haoxuan Sa, 2021. "Urban Village Shareholding: Cooperative Economic Organization in Northeast China," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 80(2), pages 665-697, March.
    2. Lin, Wanlin & Lin, George C.S., 2023. "Strategizing actors and agents in the functioning of informal property Rights: The tragicomedy of the extralegal housing market in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    3. Yang, Chen & Qian, Zhu, 2022. "The complexity of property rights embedded in the rural-to-urban resettlement of China: A case of Hangzhou," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    4. Jiang, Yanpeng & Mohabir, Nalini & Ma, Renfeng & Wu, Lichao & Chen, Mingxing, 2020. "Whose village? Stakeholder interests in the urban renewal of Hubei old village in Shenzhen," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. Li Tian, 2014. "Property Rights, Land Values and Urban Development," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15856, March.
    6. Nin-Pratt, A., 2018. "Technical and Environmental Efficiency of Water Use in Agriculture," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277486, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Donovan, Cynthia & McGlinchy, Megan & Staatz, John M. & Tschirley, David L., 2006. "Emergency Needs Assessments and the Impact of Food Aid on Local Markets," Food Security International Development Working Papers 54566, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    8. Molle, Francois & Nassif, Marie-Hélène & Jaber, Bassam & Closas, Alvar & Baydoun, Safa, 2017. "Groundwater governance in Lebanon: the case of Central Beqaa. A Policy White Paper," IWMI Reports 273348, International Water Management Institute.
    9. Coyner, Mary S., 1963. "El Salvador -- Its Agriculture and Trade," Miscellaneous Publications 316489, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    10. Arnade, Carlos Anthony & Davison, Cecil W., 1989. "Testing For Aggregation And Simultaneous Bias In U.S. Soybean Export Equations," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 21(2), pages 1-9, December.
    11. Jiang Xu & Anthony Yeh & Fulong Wu, 2009. "Land Commodification: New Land Development and Politics in China since the Late 1990s," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 890-913, December.
    12. Mackie, Arthur B., 1968. "World Trade in Selected Agricultural Commodities, 1951-65. Volume III- Textile Fibers: Cotton, Jute and Other Vegetable Fibers," Foreign Agricultural Economic Report (FAER) 144795, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    13. Fulong Wu, 2009. "Land Development, Inequality and Urban Villages in China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 885-889, December.
    14. Anne Haila, 2009. "Chinese Alternatives," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 572-575, June.
    15. Bin Li & Chaoqun Liu, 2018. "Emerging selective regimes in a fragmented authoritarian environment: The ‘three old redevelopment’ policy in Guangzhou, China from 2009 to 2014," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(7), pages 1400-1419, May.
    16. Susan Evers & Wm. Mcintosh, 1977. "Social indicators of human nutrition: Measures of nutritional status," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 185-205, January.
    17. Ariel BenYishay & Pauline Grosjean & Joseph Vecci, 2015. "The Fish is the Friend of Matriliny: Reef Density Predicts Matrilineal Inheritance," Discussion Papers 2015-21, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
    18. Jean-Marc Roda, 2001. "Market analysis for Acrean timbers," Working Papers 40396, CIRAD, Forest department, UPR40, revised Jan 2005.
    19. Houtsma, John J., 1970. "The Effects of Imports on United States Groundfish Prices," File Manuscripts, United States National Marine Fisheries Service, Economic Research Division, number 233635, August.
    20. Sabatini, Omero & Samuel, Louise N., 1969. "A Survey of Agriculture in Ethiopia," Miscellaneous Publications 316330, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:99:y:2020:i:c:s0264837719323385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.