IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjw/econen/v11y2021i1p83-93.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of audit opinion on cost of debt: Evidence from Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Nguyen Vinh Khuong

    (Faculty of Accounting and Auditing, University of Economics and Law, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)

  • Nguyen Thi Lan Huong

    (Faculty of Accounting and Auditing, University of Economics and Law, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)

  • Vy Bao Chau

    (Faculty of Accounting and Auditing, University of Economics and Law, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)

  • Nguyen Ton Huong Mai

    (Faculty of Accounting and Auditing, University of Economics and Law, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)

  • Nguyen Le Cam Thi

    (Faculty of Accounting and Auditing, University of Economics and Law, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)

  • Cu Tong Hoai Linh

    (Faculty of Accounting and Auditing, University of Economics and Law, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)

Abstract

We consider whether the category of audit opinion an enterprise receives is pertained to the cost of debt of Vietnam corporations and how does it impact them. Proceeding from the data collected from 80 listed companies in the Vietnam stock exchange in the period of 2007 - 2017, we used a quantitative method to demonstrate the negative impact of modified audit opinion on the cost of debt. When companies receive a modified opinion, they have to pay higher interest rates and have a shorter maturity. From the results, this paper suggests some implications for the financial statement disclosure of listed firms and regulators in order to contribute to the transparency of the financial reports.

Suggested Citation

  • Nguyen Vinh Khuong & Nguyen Thi Lan Huong & Vy Bao Chau & Nguyen Ton Huong Mai & Nguyen Le Cam Thi & Cu Tong Hoai Linh, 2021. "The impact of audit opinion on cost of debt: Evidence from Vietnam," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 11(1), pages 83-93.
    • Handle: RePEc:bjw:econen:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:83-93
    DOI: 10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.en.11.1.1067.2021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journalofscience.ou.edu.vn/index.php/econ-en/article/view/1067/1090
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.en.11.1.1067.2021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pei, Donglin & Hamill, Philip A., 2013. "Do modified audit opinions for Shanghai listed firms convey heterogeneous information?," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 1-11.
    2. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    3. Spence, Michael & Zeckhauser, Richard, 1971. "Insurance, Information, and Individual Action," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 61(2), pages 380-387, May.
    4. Ross, Stephen A, 1973. "The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal's Problem," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 63(2), pages 134-139, May.
    5. Bin Liu & Charles Cullinan & Junrui Zhang & Fangjun Wang, 2016. "Loan guarantees and the cost of debt: evidence from China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(38), pages 3626-3643, August.
    6. Sarfraz A. Khan & Gerald Lobo & Emeka T. Nwaeze, 2017. "Public re-release of going-concern opinions and market reaction," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(3), pages 237-267, April.
    7. Michael Minnis, 2011. "The Value of Financial Statement Verification in Debt Financing: Evidence from Private U.S. Firms," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(2), pages 457-506, May.
    8. Chen, Peter F. & He, Shaohua & Ma, Zhiming & Stice, Derrald, 2016. "The information role of audit opinions in debt contracting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 121-144.
    9. Shujun Ding & Mingzhi Liu & Zhenyu Wu, 2016. "Financial Reporting Quality and External Debt Financing Constraints: The Case of Privately Held Firms," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 52(3), pages 351-373, September.
    10. Verrecchia, Robert E., 1983. "Discretionary disclosure," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 179-194, April.
    11. Lakshmanan Shivakumar, 2013. "The role of financial reporting in debt contracting and in stewardship," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(4), pages 362-383, August.
    12. Michael Spence, 1973. "Job Market Signaling," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 87(3), pages 355-374.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hans B. Christensen & Luzi Hail & Christian Leuz, 2021. "Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1176-1248, September.
    2. Roberto Carlos Klann & Ilse Maria Beuren, 2011. "Characteristics of companies that influence their voluntary disclosure of performance indicators," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 8(2), pages 92-113, April.
    3. Michael Minnis & Nemit Shroff, 2017. "Why regulate private firm disclosure and auditing?," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(5), pages 473-502, July.
    4. Holmstrom, Bengt R. & Tirole, Jean, 1989. "The theory of the firm," Handbook of Industrial Organization, in: R. Schmalensee & R. Willig (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 2, pages 61-133, Elsevier.
    5. Pepper, Alexander & Gore, Julie, 2015. "Behavioral agency theory: new foundations for theorizing about executive compensation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 47569, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Kausar, Asad & Shroff, Nemit & White, Hal, 2016. "Real effects of the audit choice," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 157-181.
    7. Liu, Chengyun & Su, Kun & Zhang, Miaomiao, 2021. "Water disclosure and financial reporting quality for social changes: Empirical evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    8. Anna Maria Biscotti & Eugenio D’Amico, 2016. "Theoretical foundation of IC disclosure strategies in high-tech industries," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, February.
    9. Henry Tosi, 2008. "Quo Vadis? Suggestions for future corporate governance research," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 12(2), pages 153-169, May.
    10. repec:eee:labchp:v:2:y:1986:i:c:p:789-848 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Chy, Mahfuz & De Franco, Gus & Su, Barbara, 2021. "The effect of auditor litigation risk on clients' access to bank debt: Evidence from a quasi-experiment," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1).
    12. Cristiana Cardi & Camilla Mazzoli & Sabrina Severini, 2018. "Friend or foe? The effect of corporate governance on intellectual capital disclosure in IPOs," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, February.
    13. Jannik Gerwanski, 2020. "Does it pay off? Integrated reporting and cost of debt: European evidence," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2299-2319, September.
    14. Sanford J. Grossman & Oliver D. Hart, 1982. "Corporate Financial Structure and Managerial Incentives," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Information and Uncertainty, pages 107-140, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. St. Dwiarso Utomo & Zaky Machmuddah & Dian Indriana Hapsari, 2021. "The Role of Manager Compensation and Integrated Reporting in Company Value: Indonesia vs. Singapore," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-12, October.
    16. Chiara Mio & Marco Fasan & Carlo Marcon & Silvia Panfilo, 2021. "Carrot or stick? An empirical analysis of the different implementation strategies of the EU directive on nonfinancial information across Europe," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1591-1605, November.
    17. Nathalie Moureau & Dorothée Rivaud Danset, 2004. "L'incertitude dans les théories économiques," Post-Print hal-03995208, HAL.
    18. Innes, Robert, 1986. "Moral Hazard and the Genesis of Farm Debt," CUDARE Working Papers 198349, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    19. Brahmadev Panda & N. M. Leepsa, 2017. "Agency theory: Review of Theory and Evidence on Problems and Perspectives," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 10(1), pages 74-95, June.
    20. Josiah Aduda & Morgan Ongoro, 2020. "Working Capital and Earnings Management among Manufacturing Firms: A Review of Literature," Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 9(3), pages 1-5.
    21. Yassin Denis Bouzzine & Rainer Lueg, 2020. "The contagion effect of environmental violations: The case of Dieselgate in Germany," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3187-3202, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjw:econen:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:83-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vu Tuan Truong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalofscience.ou.edu.vn/index.php/econ-en .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.