IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjc/journl/v11y2024i11p77-99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trend Analysis of Maritime Security Threats and its Implications on Nigerian Seaborne Trade

Author

Listed:
  • Hilary, Owoidighe Efanga

    (Department of Maritime Transport Studies, Maritime Academy of Nigeria, Oron)

  • Ntukoghe, Bassey. O.

    (Department of Maritime Transport Studies, Maritime Academy of Nigeria, Oron)

  • Ukpong, Philip Efiong

    (Department of Maritime Transport Studies, Maritime Academy of Nigeria, Oron)

  • Ogundepo, Joshua. O.

    (Department of Maritime Transport Studies, Maritime Academy of Nigeria, Oron)

  • Ibeawuchi C. Nze

    (Department of Maritime Technology and Logistics, School of Logistics and Innovation Technology Federal University of Technology, Owerri)

  • Esin, Pedroesin Asuquo

    (School of Nautical Science Maritime Academy of Nigeria, Oron)

Abstract

The study analysed the effects of maritime security threats on value of seaborne trade in Nigeria. The objectives of the study were among other things: to estimate the trend of maritime security threats to which shipping trade is exposed to in Nigerian waters, to determine coefficient of elasticity of the value of non-oil shipping trade to variations in trends of maritime security threats in Nigeria and to determine the elasticity of port revenue to changes in trend of maritime security risks in Nigeria.. The study used quantitative research design method. Time series secondary data covering a period of 22 years from 1999 to 2020 on pirate attacks against ships trading in Nigeria, piracy related deaths and injuries affecting maritime workers in Nigeria. The multiple regression analysis method, Log-Log constant elasticity model and paired sample t-test were used to analyse the data obtained. It was found that for each 1% increase pirate attacks against ships trading in Nigerian waters leads to a 0.636% increase in value of Nigerian non-oil shipping trade over the 22 years period covered in the study. The result also indicates that for each 1% increase in piracy related deaths in Nigerian maritime industry, the value of Nigeria non-oil shipping trade increases by 0.043% while a 1% increase in piracy related injury increases by 0.023%. The relationship between the value of Nigeria’s non-oil shipping trade and variations in the trend of maritime security risks is not significant. The model showing the elastic relationship depicting the influence of variations in maritime security threats on the value of non-oil shipping trade in Nigerian maritime industry is: LOGSEATRADE = 9.882+0.636LOGPIRATE + 0.043LOGPIRDEATH + 0.023LOGINJUR +e. The model showing the elastic relationship depicting the influence of variations in maritime security risks on the value of port revenue in Nigerian maritime industry is: LOGPOREV = 5.536 + 0.101LOGPIRATE + 0.108LOGPIRDEATH + 0.016LOGINJUR +e. It was recommended among other things that in order to achieve increased growth in the value of Nigeria’s non-oil shipping trade, the security challenges bedevilling the Nigerian waters must be addressed. This is because maritime security threats are responsible for about 66% variation in the value of Nigeria’s non-oil shipping trade over the period.

Suggested Citation

  • Hilary, Owoidighe Efanga & Ntukoghe, Bassey. O. & Ukpong, Philip Efiong & Ogundepo, Joshua. O. & Ibeawuchi C. Nze & Esin, Pedroesin Asuquo, 2024. "Trend Analysis of Maritime Security Threats and its Implications on Nigerian Seaborne Trade," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 11(11), pages 77-99, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:11:y:2024:i:11:p:77-99
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/digital-library/volume-11-issue-11/77-99.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/articles/trend-analysis-of-maritime-security-threats-and-its-implications-on-nigerian-seaborne-trade/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helen B Bendall, 2010. "Cost of piracy: A comparative voyage approach," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 12(2), pages 178-195, June.
    2. Xiaowen Fu & Adolf K.Y. Ng & Yui-Yip Lau, 2010. "The impacts of maritime piracy on global economic development: the case of Somalia," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(7), pages 677-697, December.
    3. Stefan Schauer & Nineta Polemi & Haralambos Mouratidis, 2019. "Correction to: MITIGATE: a dynamic supply chain cyber risk assessment methodology," Journal of Transportation Security, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 37-37, June.
    4. Stefan Schauer & Nineta Polemi & Haralambos Mouratidis, 2019. "MITIGATE: a dynamic supply chain cyber risk assessment methodology," Journal of Transportation Security, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-35, June.
    5. Ziaul Haque Munim & Hans-Joachim Schramm, 2018. "The impacts of port infrastructure and logistics performance on economic growth: the mediating role of seaborne trade," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de la Peña Zarzuelo, Ignacio, 2021. "Cybersecurity in ports and maritime industry: Reasons for raising awareness on this issue," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 1-4.
    2. Nishat Alam Choudhary & Shalabh Singh & Tobias Schoenherr & M. Ramkumar, 2023. "Risk assessment in supply chains: a state-of-the-art review of methodologies and their applications," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(2), pages 565-607, March.
    3. Bolbot, Victor & Kulkarni, Ketki & Brunou, Päivi & Banda, Osiris Valdez & Musharraf, Mashrura, 2022. "Developments and research directions in maritime cybersecurity: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    4. Shepard, Jun U. & Pratson, Lincoln F., 2020. "Maritime piracy in the Strait of Hormuz and implications of energy export security," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    5. Thomas Gries & Margarete Redlin, 2014. "Maritime Piracy: Socio-Economic, Political, and Institutional Determinants," Working Papers CIE 75, Paderborn University, CIE Center for International Economics.
    6. Alexander Sandkamp & Vincent Stamer & Shuyao Yang, 2022. "Where has the rum gone? The impact of maritime piracy on trade and transport," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 158(3), pages 751-778, August.
    7. M. J. Hermoso-Orzáez & J. Garzón-Moreno, 2022. "Risk management methodology in the supply chain: a case study applied," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 313(2), pages 1051-1075, June.
    8. Alexander-Nikolai Sandkamp & Shuyao Yang, 2018. "Where Has the Rum Gone? Firms’ Choice of Transport Mode under the Threat of Maritime Piracy," ifo Working Paper Series 271, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    9. Obed B.C. Ndikom & Buhari Sodiq Olusegun, 2019. "The Presidential Order and Challenges of the Maritime Sector in Nigeria," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 3(4), pages 117-133.
    10. Cheung, Kam-Fung & Bell, Michael G.H. & Bhattacharjya, Jyotirmoyee, 2021. "Cybersecurity in logistics and supply chain management: An overview and future research directions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    11. Gregory Whitten & Xiaoyi Dai & Simon Fan & Yu Pang, 2020. "Do political relations affect international trade? Evidence from China’s twelve trading partners," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-24, December.
    12. Yang, Zaili & Ng, Adolf K.Y. & Wang, Jin, 2014. "A new risk quantification approach in port facility security assessment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 72-90.
    13. Mustafa Polat & Karahan Kara & Avni Zafer Acar, 2023. "Competitiveness based logistics performance index: An empirical analysis in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 24(2-3), pages 97-119, June.
    14. Deda Đelović, 2024. "Considerations on Prevention of Pollution from Ships in a Seaport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-24, June.
    15. Shikur, Zewdie Habte, 2022. "Logistics Performance, Export, Agricultural, Manufacturing, and Aggregate Economic Growth: A Focus on Sectoral Perspectives," Journal of Economic Development, The Economic Research Institute, Chung-Ang University, vol. 47(3), pages 107-123, September.
    16. W. Matekenya & R. Ncwadi, 2022. "The impact of maritime transport financing on total trade in South Africa," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Suneet Singh & Ashish Dwivedi & Saurabh Pratap, 2023. "Sustainable Maritime Freight Transportation: Current Status and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-23, April.
    18. Kahuina Miller & Tetsuro Hyodo, 2022. "Assessment of port efficiency within Latin America," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-27, December.
    19. Inmaculada Mart�nez-Zarzoso & Sami Bensassi, 2013. "The Price Of Modern Maritime Piracy," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(5), pages 397-418, October.
    20. Syed Abdul Rehman Khan & Danish Iqbal Godil & Zhang Yu & Farwa Abbas & Muhammad Asif Shamim, 2022. "Adoption of renewable energy sources, low‐carbon initiatives, and advanced logistical infrastructure—an step toward integrated global progress," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 275-288, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:11:y:2024:i:11:p:77-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.