IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bes/jnlbes/v1y1983i2p101-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Examination of the Conceptual Issues Involved in Developing Credit-scoring Models

Author

Listed:
  • Reichert, Alan K
  • Cho, Chien-Ching
  • Wagner, George M

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Reichert, Alan K & Cho, Chien-Ching & Wagner, George M, 1983. "An Examination of the Conceptual Issues Involved in Developing Credit-scoring Models," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 1(2), pages 101-114, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bes:jnlbes:v:1:y:1983:i:2:p:101-14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li Gan & Roberto Mosquera, 2008. "An Empirical Study of the Credit Market with Unobserved Consumer Typers," NBER Working Papers 13873, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Bastos, Joao, 2007. "Credit scoring with boosted decision trees," MPRA Paper 8034, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Lu Gao & Kanshukan Rajaratnam & Peter Beling, 2016. "Loan origination decisions using a multinomial scorecard," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 243(1), pages 199-210, August.
    4. Ha Thu Nguyen, 2016. "Reject inference in application scorecards: evidence from France," Working Papers hal-04141601, HAL.
    5. Thomas, Lyn C., 2000. "A survey of credit and behavioural scoring: forecasting financial risk of lending to consumers," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 149-172.
    6. Ha-Thu Nguyen, 2016. "Reject inference in application scorecards: evidence from France," EconomiX Working Papers 2016-10, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    7. Hazar Altinbas & Goktug Cenk Akkaya, 2017. "Improving the performance of statistical learning methods with a combined meta-heuristic for consumer credit risk assessment," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(4), pages 255-280, November.
    8. Crook, Jonathan & Banasik, John, 2004. "Does reject inference really improve the performance of application scoring models?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 857-874, April.
    9. Pérez-Martín, A. & Pérez-Torregrosa, A. & Vaca, M., 2018. "Big Data techniques to measure credit banking risk in home equity loans," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 448-454.
    10. Ahmed Almustfa Hussin Adam Khatir & Marco Bee, 2022. "Machine Learning Models and Data-Balancing Techniques for Credit Scoring: What Is the Best Combination?," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, August.
    11. João A. Bastos, 2022. "Predicting Credit Scores with Boosted Decision Trees," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-11, November.
    12. Sanjeev Mittal & Pankaj Gupta & K. Jain, 2011. "Neural network credit scoring model for micro enterprise financing in India," Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 3(3), pages 224-242, October.
    13. Mark Schreiner, 2001. "A Scoring Model of the Risk of Costly Arrears at a Microfinance Lender in Bolivia," Development and Comp Systems 0109005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Lee, Tian-Shyug & Chiu, Chih-Chou & Chou, Yu-Chao & Lu, Chi-Jie, 2006. "Mining the customer credit using classification and regression tree and multivariate adaptive regression splines," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(4), pages 1113-1130, February.
    15. José Carlos Trejo-García & Miguel Ángel Martínez-García & Francisco Venegas-Martínez, 2017. "Credit risk management at retail in Mexico: An econometric improvement in the selection of variables and changes in their characteristics," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 62(2), pages 13-14, Abril-Jun.
    16. Chi-Feng Peng & Li-Hsing Ho & Sang-Bing Tsai & Yin-Cheng Hsiao & Yuming Zhai & Quan Chen & Li-Chung Chang & Zhiwen Shang, 2017. "Applying the Mahalanobis–Taguchi System to Improve Tablet PC Production Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-17, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bes:jnlbes:v:1:y:1983:i:2:p:101-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.amstat.org/publications/jbes/index.cfm?fuseaction=main .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.