IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i9p1557-d110624.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying the Mahalanobis–Taguchi System to Improve Tablet PC Production Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Chi-Feng Peng

    (Ph.D. Program of Technology Management, Chung Hua University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Li-Hsing Ho

    (Department of Technology Management, Chung-Hua University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Sang-Bing Tsai

    (Zhongshan Institute, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Zhongshan 528402, China
    Economics and Management College, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yin-Cheng Hsiao

    (Department of Technology Management, Chung-Hua University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan)

  • Yuming Zhai

    (School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai 201418, China)

  • Quan Chen

    (Zhongshan Institute, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Zhongshan 528402, China)

  • Li-Chung Chang

    (Zhongshan Institute, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Zhongshan 528402, China)

  • Zhiwen Shang

    (Business School, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China)

Abstract

Product testing is a critical step in tablet PC manufacturing processes. Purchases of testing equipment and on-site testing personnel increase overall manufacturing costs. In addition, to improve manufacturing capabilities, manufacturers must also produce products with higher quality and at a lower cost than their competitors if they are to attract consumers and gain a competitive edge in their industry. The Mahalanobis–Taguchi System (MTS) is a novel technique proposed by Genichi Taguchi for performing diagnoses and forecasting with multivariate data. The MTS can be used to select important factors and has been applied in numerous engineering fields to improve product and process quality. In the present study, the MTS, logistic regression, and a neural network were used to improve the tablet PC product testing process. The results indicated that the MTS attained 98% predictive power after insignificant test items were eliminated. The MTS performance was superior to those of the conventional logistic regression and neural network, which attained 93.3% and 94.7% predictive power, respectively. After the testing process was improved using the MTS, the number of test items in the tablet PC product testing process was reduced from 56 to 14. This facilitated the development of more stable test site configurations and effectively reduced the testing time, number of testers required, and equipment costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Chi-Feng Peng & Li-Hsing Ho & Sang-Bing Tsai & Yin-Cheng Hsiao & Yuming Zhai & Quan Chen & Li-Chung Chang & Zhiwen Shang, 2017. "Applying the Mahalanobis–Taguchi System to Improve Tablet PC Production Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:9:p:1557-:d:110624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/9/1557/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/9/1557/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Guoqiang & Y. Hu, Michael & Eddy Patuwo, B. & C. Indro, Daniel, 1999. "Artificial neural networks in bankruptcy prediction: General framework and cross-validation analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 16-32, July.
    2. Ning Wang & Can Saygin & Shu-dong Sun, 2013. "Impact of Mahalanobis space construction on effectiveness of Mahalanobis-Taguchi system," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(2), pages 233-249.
    3. Reichert, Alan K & Cho, Chien-Ching & Wagner, George M, 1983. "An Examination of the Conceptual Issues Involved in Developing Credit-scoring Models," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 1(2), pages 101-114, April.
    4. Seoung Bum Kim & Kwok-Leung Tsui & Thuntee Sukchotrat & Victoria C.P. Chen, 2009. "A comparison study and discussion of the Mahalanobis-Taguchi System," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(6), pages 631-644.
    5. Sang-Bing Tsai & Min-Fang Chien & Youzhi Xue & Lei Li & Xiaodong Jiang & Quan Chen & Jie Zhou & Lei Wang, 2015. "Using the Fuzzy DEMATEL to Determine Environmental Performance: A Case of Printed Circuit Board Industry in Taiwan," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hong-Bo Shi & Yong-Cai Cui & Sang-Bing Tsai & Dong-Mei Wang, 2018. "The Impact of Technical–Nontechnical Factors Synergy on Innovation Performance: The Moderating Effect of Talent Flow," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Quan Chen & Sang-Bing Tsai & Yuming Zhai & Chien-Chi Chu & Jie Zhou & Guodong Li & Yuxiang Zheng & Jiangtao Wang & Li-Chung Chang & Chao-Feng Hsu, 2018. "An Empirical Research on Bank Client Credit Assessments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Jackson Jinhong Mi & Zongsheng Huang & Kai Wang & Sang-Bing Tsai & Guodong Li & Jiangtao Wang, 2018. "The Presence of a Powerful Retailer on Dynamic Collecting Closed-Loop Supply Chain From a Sustainable Innovation Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Wei Yan & Junwu Chai & Zhifeng Qian & Sang-Bing Tsai & Hong Chen & Yu Xiong, 2018. "Operational Decisions on Remanufacturing Outsourcing Involved with Corporate Environmental and Social Responsibility—A Sustainable Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Kai Wang & Haomin Zhang & Sang-Bing Tsai & Jin Jiang & Yun Sun & Jiangtao Wang, 2018. "An Empirical Study on Effective Tax Rate and CEO Promotion: Evidence from Local SOEs in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    6. Kai-Cheng Liao & Ming-Yue Yue & Si-Wei Sun & Hong-Bo Xue & Wei Liu & Sang-Bing Tsai & Jiang-Tao Wang, 2018. "An Evaluation of Coupling Coordination between Tourism and Finance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-23, July.
    7. Ning Wang & Zhuo Zhang & Jiao Zhao & Dawei Hu, 2022. "Recognition method of equipment state with the FLDA based Mahalanobis–Taguchi system," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 417-435, April.
    8. Aijun Liu & Xiaohui Ji & Sang-Bing Tsai & Hui Lu & Gang Du & Feng Li & Guodong Li & Jiangtao Wang, 2018. "An Empirical Study on the Innovation Sharing Express Box: Collaborative Consumption and the Overlay Network Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Le, Hong Hanh & Viviani, Jean-Laurent, 2018. "Predicting bank failure: An improvement by implementing a machine-learning approach to classical financial ratios," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 16-25.
    2. Lin, Fengyi & Yeh, Ching Chiang & Lee, Meng Yuan, 2013. "A Hybrid Business Failure Prediction Model Using Locally Linear Embedding And Support Vector Machines," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(1), pages 82-97, March.
    3. Zeineb Affes & Rania Hentati-Kaffel, 2016. "Forecast bankruptcy using a blend of clustering and MARS model - Case of US banks," Post-Print halshs-01314553, HAL.
    4. Mitroussi, K. & Abouarghoub, W. & Haider, J.J. & Pettit, S.J. & Tigka, N., 2016. "Performance drivers of shipping loans: An empirical investigation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P3), pages 438-452.
    5. Juraini Zainol Abidin & Nur Adiana Hiau Abdullah & Karren Lee-Hwei Khaw, 2020. "Predicting SMEs Failure: Logistic Regression vs Artificial Neural Network Models," Capital Markets Review, Malaysian Finance Association, vol. 28(2), pages 29-41.
    6. Alina Mihaela Dima & Simona Vasilache, 2016. "Credit Risk modeling for Companies Default Prediction using Neural Networks," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(3), pages 127-143, September.
    7. A?da Kammoun & Imen Triki, 2016. "Credit Scoring Models for a Tunisian Microfinance Institution: Comparison between Artificial Neural Network and Logistic Regression," Review of Economics & Finance, Better Advances Press, Canada, vol. 6, pages 61-78, February.
    8. Nasim Nasirpour & Alireza Mazdaki & Esmail Enayati, 2016. "The Investigation and Comparison of the Performance of Heuristic Methods in the Prediction of the Type of Auditor’s Opinion in Firms Accepted in Tehran Stock Exchange," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(6), pages 148-148, June.
    9. Jones, Stewart & Johnstone, David & Wilson, Roy, 2015. "An empirical evaluation of the performance of binary classifiers in the prediction of credit ratings changes," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 72-85.
    10. Yajiao Tang & Junkai Ji & Yulin Zhu & Shangce Gao & Zheng Tang & Yuki Todo, 2019. "A Differential Evolution-Oriented Pruning Neural Network Model for Bankruptcy Prediction," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-21, August.
    11. Lessmann, Stefan & Voß, Stefan, 2017. "Car resale price forecasting: The impact of regression method, private information, and heterogeneity on forecast accuracy," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 864-877.
    12. Rogelio A. Mancisidor & Kjersti Aas, 2022. "Multimodal Generative Models for Bankruptcy Prediction Using Textual Data," Papers 2211.08405, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    13. Duan Ji & Yuyu Liu & Lin Zhang & Jingjing An & Wenyan Sun, 2020. "Green Social Responsibility and Company Financing Cost-Based on Empirical Studies of Listed Companies in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-16, August.
    14. Hu, Jiantao & Du, Yuxian & Mo, Hongming & Wei, Daijun & Deng, Yong, 2016. "A modified weighted TOPSIS to identify influential nodes in complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 444(C), pages 73-85.
    15. Nihan Kabadayı, 2020. "An Integrated Fuzzy DEMATEL and Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS Method to Evaluate Sustainable Suppliers," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 8(2), pages 201-226, December.
    16. Hu, Yu-Chiang & Ansell, Jake, 2007. "Measuring retail company performance using credit scoring techniques," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(3), pages 1595-1606, December.
    17. En-Der Su & Shih-Ming Huang, 2010. "Comparing Firm Failure Predictions Between Logit, KMV, and ZPP Models: Evidence from Taiwan’s Electronics Industry," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 17(3), pages 209-239, September.
    18. Burcu KUZUCU YAPAR & Abdulkadir KESKIN, 2023. "Determining the Criteria Affecting Tax Ethics in Türkiye Using the Fuzzy DEMATEL Method," Istanbul Journal of Economics-Istanbul Iktisat Dergisi, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 73(73-2), pages 745-780, December.
    19. Vladislav V. Afanasev & Yulia A. Tarasova, 2022. "Default Prediction for Housing and Utilities Management Firms Using Non-Financial Data," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 6, pages 91-110, December.
    20. Ha-Thu Nguyen, 2016. "Reject inference in application scorecards: evidence from France," EconomiX Working Papers 2016-10, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:9:p:1557-:d:110624. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.