IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bes/jnlasa/v103i484y2008p1350-1353.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comment: The Design and Analysis of Gold Standard Randomized Experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Rubin, Donald B.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Rubin, Donald B., 2008. "Comment: The Design and Analysis of Gold Standard Randomized Experiments," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103(484), pages 1350-1353.
    • Handle: RePEc:bes:jnlasa:v:103:i:484:y:2008:p:1350-1353
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://pubs.amstat.org/doi/abs/10.1198/016214508000001011
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lijuan Tao & Xiaoju Wei & Wenjing Wang, 2023. "Does Enterprise Internal Control Improve Environmental Performance—Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Yasemin Kisbu-Sakarya & Thomas D. Cook & Yang Tang & M. H. Clark, 2018. "Comparative Regression Discontinuity: A Stress Test With Small Samples," Evaluation Review, , vol. 42(1), pages 111-143, February.
    3. Gouri Shankar Mishra & Patricia L. Mokhtarian & Regina R. Clewlow & Keith F. Widaman, 2019. "Addressing the joint occurrence of self-selection and simultaneity biases in the estimation of program effects based on cross-sectional observational surveys: case study of travel behavior effects in ," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 95-123, February.
    4. Xiaofeng Liu, 2013. "Sample size determination for the confidence interval of mean comparison adjusted by multiple covariates," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 22(2), pages 155-166, June.
    5. Zhenzhen Xu & John D. Kalbfleisch, 2013. "Repeated Randomization and Matching in Multi-Arm Trials," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(4), pages 949-959, December.
    6. Jared Coopersmith & Thomas D. Cook & Jelena Zurovac & Duncan Chaplin & Lauren V. Forrow, 2022. "Internal And External Validity Of The Comparative Interrupted Time‐Series Design: A Meta‐Analysis," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(1), pages 252-277, January.
    7. Goldberg, Matthew H., 2019. "How often does random assignment fail? Estimates and recommendations," OSF Preprints s2j4r, Center for Open Science.
    8. Sarah Tahamont & Zubin Jelveh & Aaron Chalfin & Shi Yan & Benjamin Hansen, 2019. "Administrative Data Linking and Statistical Power Problems in Randomized Experiments," NBER Working Papers 25657, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Ke Zhu & Hanzhong Liu, 2023. "Pair‐switching rerandomization," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 2127-2142, September.
    10. Jake Anders & Francesca Foliano & Matt Bursnall & Richard Dorsett & Nathan Hudson & Johnny Runge & Stefan Speckesser, 2021. "The effect of embedding foramtive assesment on pupil attainment," CEPEO Working Paper Series 21-10, UCL Centre for Education Policy and Equalising Opportunities, revised Nov 2021.
    11. Travis St.Clair & Kelly Hallberg & Thomas D. Cook, 2016. "The Validity and Precision of the Comparative Interrupted Time-Series Design," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 41(3), pages 269-299, June.
    12. Julia Muschallik & Kerstin Pull, 2016. "Mentoring in higher education: does it enhance mentees’ research productivity?," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 210-223, April.
    13. Kari Lock Morgan & Donald B. Rubin, 2015. "Rerandomization to Balance Tiers of Covariates," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(512), pages 1412-1421, December.
    14. Xiaofeng Steven Liu, 2010. "Sample Size for Confidence Interval of Covariate-Adjusted Mean Difference," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 35(6), pages 714-725, December.
    15. Alexandre Marcellesi & Nancy Cartwright, 2013. "Modeling climate mitigation and adaptation policies to predict their effectiveness: The limits of randomized controlled trials," GRI Working Papers 120, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    16. Jinglong Zhao, 2024. "Experimental Design For Causal Inference Through An Optimization Lens," Papers 2408.09607, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bes:jnlasa:v:103:i:484:y:2008:p:1350-1353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.amstat.org/publications/jasa/index.cfm?fuseaction=main .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.