IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/beo/ekidpr/y2021i43p1-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate Social Responsibility And Environmental Issues: The Report From Italian Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Vojislav Babić
  • Siniša Zarić
  • Rossana Piccolo

Abstract

This is an empirical analysis of CSR initiatives in the Italian region of Campania. The aim of this study is to clarify the share’s differences in environmental protection in the overall CSR activities as well as the evaluation of the altruistic attitudes on the essence of CSR. The regression model examines the impact of investments in CSR, cost-benefit analysis and territory size on companies' interest in CSR. Campania companies have got a pronounced environmental awareness due to a significant number of national associations promoting sustainable development and easier access to EU funds. When testing the altruistic attitude on CSR, companies in Campania are closer to the profit approach. Based on the results of regression analysis, the predictor variables synergistically explain CSR interest in Campania.

Suggested Citation

  • Vojislav Babić & Siniša Zarić & Rossana Piccolo, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility And Environmental Issues: The Report From Italian Companies," Ekonomske ideje i praksa, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, issue 43, pages 1-14, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:beo:ekidpr:y:2021:i:43:p:1-14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ekof.bg.ac.rs/journals/eip/43/01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anushree Poddar & Sapna A. Narula, 2020. "A Study of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Practices of the States in India," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Nayan Mitra & René Schmidpeter (ed.), Mandated Corporate Social Responsibility, pages 85-94, Springer.
    2. Josefina Fernández-Guadaño & Jesús H. Sarria-Pedroza, 2018. "Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Value Creation from a Stakeholder Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-10, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabricio Carlos Schmidt & Roselaine Ruviaro Zanini & André Luis Korzenowski & Reno Schmidt Junior & Karl Benchimol Xavier do Nascimento, 2018. "Evaluation of Sustainability Practices in Small and Medium-Sized Manufacturing Enterprises in Southern Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-11, July.
    2. Judit Creixans-Tenas & Dolores Gallardo-Vázquez & Núria Arimany-Serrat, 2020. "Social Responsibility, Communication and Financial Data of Hospitals: A Structural Modelling Approach in a Sustainability Scope," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Shyam Singh & Nathalie Holvoet & Vivek Pandey, 2018. "Bridging Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility: Culture of Monitoring and Evaluation of CSR Initiatives in India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Irina N. Tkachenko & Irina V. Pervukhina & Aleksandr A. Zlygostev, 2020. "Modeling the contribution and benefits of company stakeholders," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(2), pages 2-15, April.
    5. Chen-Yueh Chen & Ya-Lun Chou & Chun-Shih Lee, 2021. "Social Innovation, Employee Value Cocreation, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in a Sport-Related Social Enterprise: Mediating Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-10, November.
    6. Josefina Fernandez-Guadaño & Manuel Lopez-Millan & Jesús Sarria-Pedroza, 2020. "Cooperative Entrepreneurship Model for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-11, July.
    7. Marek Potkány & Miloš Gejdoš & Marek Debnár, 2018. "Sustainable Innovation Approach for Wood Quality Evaluation in Green Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-14, August.
    8. Elif Akben-Selcuk, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Moderating Role of Ownership Concentration in Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-10, July.
    9. Shah, Muhammad Umair & Guild, Paul D., 2022. "Stakeholder engagement strategy of technology firms: A review and applied view of stakeholder theory," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    10. Seonggoo Ji & Ihsan Ullah Jan, 2019. "The Impact of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Frontline Employee’s Emotional Labor Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, March.
    11. Näyhä, Annukka, 2020. "Finnish forest-based companies in transition to the circular bioeconomy - drivers, organizational resources and innovations," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    12. Wilmer Rivas-Asanza & Jennifer Celleri-Pacheco & Javier Andrade-Garda & Rafael García-Vázquez & Virginia Mato-Abad & Santiago Rodríguez-Yáñez & Sonia Suárez-Garaboa, 2018. "Environmental Sustainability in Information Technologies Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-25, December.
    13. Sara Rodriguez-Gomez & Maria Lourdes Arco-Castro & Maria Victoria Lopez-Perez & Lazaro Rodríguez-Ariza, 2020. "Where Does CSR Come from and Where Does It Go? A Review of the State of the Art," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Qingyu Zhang & Sohail Ahmad, 2021. "Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility Execution Effects on Purchase Intention with the Moderating Role of Customer Awareness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, April.
    15. Lafont, Juan & Ruiz, Felipe & Gil-Gómez, Hermenegildo & Oltra-Badenes, Raul, 2020. "Value creation in listed companies: A bibliometric approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 428-434.
    16. Shahid Ali & Junrui Zhang & Muhammad Usman & Farman Ullah Khan & Amir Ikram & Bilal Anwar, 2019. "Sub-National Institutional Contingencies and Corporate Social Responsibility Performance: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-21, October.
    17. Syeda Humayra Abedin & Silima Subha & Mumtaheena Anwar & Md. Nurul Kabir & Yasean A. Tahat & Mohammed Hossain, 2023. "Environmental Performance and Corporate Governance: Evidence from Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    18. Irina N. Tkachenko, 2021. "Rethinking the stakeholder approach to corporate governance amid the coronavirus crisis: From commitment declaration to applied models," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 12(2), pages 2-16, April.
    19. Lei Yu & Daojuan Wang & Qi Wang, 2018. "The Effect of Independent Director Reputation Incentives on Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.
    20. Alexander Bergmann & Peter Posch, 2018. "Mandatory Sustainability Reporting in Germany: Does Size Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    environmental CSR; environmental protection; altruistic attitude; interest in CSR; Campania companies;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:beo:ekidpr:y:2021:i:43:p:1-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Goran Petrić (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efbeoyu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.