IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdy/modfin/v2y2024i2p96-119id111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the connectedness of the Nigerian banking network and its implications for systemic risk

Author

Listed:
  • Miriam Kamah
  • Joshua Riti

Abstract

This study examines fifteen major banks’ network connectedness in the Nigerian banking system via its stock returns. The paper studies both the static and dynamic network connectedness of banks built on the generalized forecast error variance decomposition, using daily data from January 4, 2005, to June 28, 2019, of publicly traded banks. This study finds a substantial total connectedness, with a high pairwise connectedness among the system’s large banks. The dynamic evolution of connectedness in the network reveals that banks’ connectivity increases in response to certain economic episodes. The evolution of the global network's topological properties reveals that it is mainly susceptible to shocks threatening its stability. Additionally, the study computes a composite index of systemic importance for the Nigerian banking system by combining several network centrality metrics using the principal component analysis. The outcome shows that large banks are more centralized in the network, and the larger the scale of assets a bank has, the more systemically relevant the bank is in the network. Since systemic risk emanates from connectedness, frequent assessment of the banking system's connectedness and systemic importance will aid policy decisions. The proposed measure of systemic importance can be incorporated into the CBN’s stress testing mechanism for fast-tracking risk potential banks.

Suggested Citation

  • Miriam Kamah & Joshua Riti, 2024. "Measuring the connectedness of the Nigerian banking network and its implications for systemic risk," Modern Finance, Modern Finance Institute, vol. 2(2), pages 96-119.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdy:modfin:v:2:y:2024:i:2:p:96-119:id:111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mf-journal.com/article/view/111
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Billio, Monica & Casarin, Roberto & Costola, Michele & Pasqualini, Andrea, 2016. "An entropy-based early warning indicator for systemic risk," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 42-59.
    2. Fang, Libing & Sun, Boyang & Li, Huijing & Yu, Honghai, 2018. "Systemic risk network of Chinese financial institutions," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 190-206.
    3. Viral V. Acharya & Lasse H. Pedersen & Thomas Philippon & Matthew Richardson, 2017. "Measuring Systemic Risk," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 30(1), pages 2-47.
    4. Diebold, Francis X. & Yılmaz, Kamil, 2014. "On the network topology of variance decompositions: Measuring the connectedness of financial firms," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 182(1), pages 119-134.
    5. Mert Demirer & Francis X. Diebold & Laura Liu & Kamil Yilmaz, 2018. "Estimating global bank network connectedness," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Nelson, Daniel B, 1991. "Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(2), pages 347-370, March.
    7. Pesaran, H. Hashem & Shin, Yongcheol, 1998. "Generalized impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 17-29, January.
    8. Kreis, Yvonne & Leisen, Dietmar P.J., 2018. "Systemic risk in a structural model of bank default linkages," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 221-236.
    9. Nier, Erlend & Yang, Jing & Yorulmazer, Tanju & Alentorn, Amadeo, 2007. "Network models and financial stability," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 2033-2060, June.
    10. Hale, Galina & Lopez, Jose A., 2019. "Monitoring banking system connectedness with big data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 203-220.
    11. Camelia Minoiu & Chanhyun Kang & V.S. Subrahmanian & Anamaria Berea, 2015. "Does financial connectedness predict crises?," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 607-624, April.
    12. Gregory M. Foggitt & André Heymans & Gary Van Vuuren, 2019. "Measuring the systemic risk transfer from the United States to the South African financial sector," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(27), pages 2934-2944, June.
    13. Verma, Ramprasad & Ahmad, Wasim & Uddin, Gazi Salah & Bekiros, Stelios, 2019. "Analysing the systemic risk of Indian banks," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 103-108.
    14. van de Leur, Michiel C.W. & Lucas, André & Seeger, Norman J., 2017. "Network, market, and book-based systemic risk rankings," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 84-90.
    15. Mathias Manguzvane & John Weirstrass Muteba Mwamba, 2019. "Modelling systemic risk in the South African banking sector using CoVaR," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(5), pages 624-641, September.
    16. Hong Fan & Chirongo Moses Keregero & Qianqian Gao, 2018. "The Application of Macroprudential Capital Requirements in Managing Systemic Risk," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-15, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmad, Wasim & Tiwari, Shiv Ratan & Wadhwani, Akshay & Khan, Mohammad Azeem & Bekiros, Stelios, 2023. "Financial networks and systemic risk vulnerabilities: A tale of Indian banks," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    2. Tian, Sihua & Li, Shaofang & Gu, Qinen, 2023. "Measurement and contagion modelling of systemic risk in China's financial sectors: Evidence for functional data analysis and complex network," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    3. Foglia, Matteo & Addi, Abdelhamid & Angelini, Eliana, 2022. "The Eurozone banking sector in the time of COVID-19: Measuring volatility connectedness," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    4. Yun, Tae-Sub & Jeong, Deokjong & Park, Sunyoung, 2019. "“Too central to fail” systemic risk measure using PageRank algorithm," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 251-272.
    5. Yu Chen & Jie Hu & Weiping Zhang, 2020. "Too Connected to Fail? Evidence from a Chinese Financial Risk Spillover Network," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 28(6), pages 78-100, November.
    6. Geraci, Marco Valerio & Gnabo, Jean-Yves, 2018. "Measuring Interconnectedness between Financial Institutions with Bayesian Time-Varying Vector Autoregressions," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(3), pages 1371-1390, June.
    7. Das, Sanjiv R. & Kalimipalli, Madhu & Nayak, Subhankar, 2022. "Banking networks, systemic risk, and the credit cycle in emerging markets," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    8. Lovcha, Yuliya & Perez-Laborda, Alejandro, 2020. "Dynamic frequency connectedness between oil and natural gas volatilities," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 181-189.
    9. Ellington, Michael, 2022. "Fat tails, serial dependence, and implied volatility index connections," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(2), pages 768-779.
    10. Shi Chen & Wolfgang Karl Hardle & Brenda L'opez Cabrera, 2020. "Regularization Approach for Network Modeling of German Power Derivative Market," Papers 2009.09739, arXiv.org.
    11. Dungey, Mardi & Harvey, John & Volkov, Vladimir, 2019. "The changing international network of sovereign debt and financial institutions," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 149-168.
    12. Xiao-Li Gong & Hao-Yang Ning & Xiong Xiong, 2025. "Research on the cross-contagion between international stock markets and geopolitical risks: the two-layer network perspective," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-32, December.
    13. Wang, Gang-Jin & Chen, Yang-Yang & Si, Hui-Bin & Xie, Chi & Chevallier, Julien, 2021. "Multilayer information spillover networks analysis of China’s financial institutions based on variance decompositions," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 325-347.
    14. Baruník, Jozef & Ellington, Michael, 2024. "Persistence in financial connectedness and systemic risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(1), pages 393-407.
    15. Kamil Yilmaz, 2018. "Bank Volatility Connectedness in South East Asia," Koç University-TUSIAD Economic Research Forum Working Papers 1807, Koc University-TUSIAD Economic Research Forum.
    16. Francis X. Diebold & Laura Liu & Kamil Yilmaz, 2018. "Commodity Connectedness," Central Banking, Analysis, and Economic Policies Book Series, in: Enrique G. Mendoza & Ernesto Pastén & Diego Saravia (ed.),Monetary Policy and Global Spillovers: Mechanisms, Effects and Policy Measures, edition 1, volume 25, chapter 4, pages 097-136, Central Bank of Chile.
    17. Ge, S., 2020. "Text-Based Linkages and Local Risk Spillovers in the Equity Market," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 20115, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    18. Hsu, Chih-Hsiang & Lee, Hsiu-Chuan & Lien, Donald, 2020. "Stock market uncertainty, volatility connectedness of financial institutions, and stock-bond return correlations," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 600-621.
    19. Chen, Shi & Härdle, Wolfgang Karl & López Cabrera, Brenda, 2018. "Regularization Approach for Network Modeling of German Energy Market," IRTG 1792 Discussion Papers 2018-017, Humboldt University of Berlin, International Research Training Group 1792 "High Dimensional Nonstationary Time Series".
    20. Nong, Huifu & Yu, Ziliang & Li, Yang, 2024. "Financial shock transmission in China's banking and housing sectors: A network analysis," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 701-723.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdy:modfin:v:2:y:2024:i:2:p:96-119:id:111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adam Zaremba (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mf-journal.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.